This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Long-live the King
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Badger11  Beckenham 10 May 23 9.02am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
He was invited. And he could have said no thanks if I am not going to be allowed to sit at the big table with the adults.
One more point |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| steeleye20 Croydon 12 May 23 7.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by sydtheeagle
Surely to be invited and then more or less publicly diminished is the opposite of what should have happened? The whole thing struck me as another example of the pettiness and dysfunctionality of the Royal family. "We'll invite you because that's what one's expected to do, but you can swing in the wind once you're here". Like I said, I don't care but for me, not a good look. With a family like that, it's not hard to understand Harry's pysche. Edited by sydtheeagle (10 May 2023 9.00am) Charles now saying he didn't want to invite him! Blimey. You certainly have a point, his own son. I could see Harry as a King actually, he has a Henry VIII look about him. King Charles is hardly going to win any battles, and as for Camilla, she may tell you how to re-cycle your tea-bags.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 12 May 23 7.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
And he could have said no thanks if I am not going to be allowed to sit at the big table with the adults. I thought he didn’t want to stay so as to get back for his child’s birthday. But there again, last year he apparently missed the birthday to attend a polo match, so who knows what the real reason is. But I’m sure Harry can get another book out of his half a day’s attendance at the Coronation…
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
PalazioVecchio  south pole 12 May 23 7.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
what ? like, Psychopath ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 12 May 23 9.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
what ? like, Psychopath ? Probably. But at least you win battles and have the odd wife or two, or six.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 08 Mar 24 12.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
According to this guy His Madge has quietly abdicated.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lombardinho
According to this guy His Madge has quietly abdicated. There are literally tens of times the royal family was changed - if they didn't they would truly trace their heritage back to Alfred, which is clearly rubbish. Cnut was king FFS. He was a Viking. The Tudors had no actual royal blood and take one look into the Norman kings and the Plantagenets. Later on William of Orange and George III were nowhere near in line to the throne. If Charles goes then it will be likely William - which I believe would be a positive thing. However, having looked into Charles a bit over the years, the only way he'll abdicate is if he's dying, and frankly I wouldn't even expect it then. He's always wanted it.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Hrolf The Ganger 08 Mar 24 1.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I managed to watch 2 minutes and 40 seconds. Complete anti royalist claptrap. You know I like a conspiracy, but the fact that he is an Australian should be all you need to know.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I managed to watch 2 minutes and 40 seconds. Complete anti royalist claptrap. You know I like a conspiracy, but the fact that he is an Australian should be all you need to know. Pommie b******
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 08 Mar 24 1.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
There are literally tens of times the royal family was changed - if they didn't they would truly trace their heritage back to Alfred, which is clearly rubbish. Cnut was king FFS. He was a Viking. The Tudors had no actual royal blood and take one look into the Norman kings and the Plantagenets. Later on William of Orange and George III were nowhere near in line to the throne. If Charles goes then it will be likely William - which I believe would be a positive thing. However, having looked into Charles a bit over the years, the only way he'll abdicate is if he's dying, and frankly I wouldn't even expect it then. He's always wanted it. It's fairly common knowledge that royal ancestry doesn't join up all the way back to William the First or who ever you feel like choosing. Of course Royalty is silly, but it's better than President Sunak or Sheik someone or other.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Mar 24 1.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
It's fairly common knowledge that royal ancestry doesn't join up all the way back to William the First or who ever you feel like choosing. Of course Royalty is silly, but it's better than President Sunak or Sheik someone or other. I have no issue with it. I was countering this 1603 and 1567 rubbish - I've heard it all before. I'm a Tudor historian. I always hear that crap and wanted to point out how meaningless it is. A Sheik sounds alright though - we can all be rich and drive around in luxury cars. Not drinking though - won't work for me.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 08 Mar 24 1.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I managed to watch 2 minutes and 40 seconds. Complete anti royalist claptrap. You know I like a conspiracy, but the fact that he is an Australian should be all you need to know. Kiwi actually.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.