What? Now, come on, is she a resident or a non-resident? Make your mind up.

You think she didn't go to a private clinic to give birth? And all the ante/post natal treatment? And schooling the kids at fee payiig schools?

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Here are your own words:

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays. Nobody else really cares."

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

"Life's not fair, but neither are humans. .. Start a movement. Get all your toddler mates to help."

"I didn't call anyone interested in changing anything 'outraged idiots'. I advised the idiots to change the things they are outraged about."

????

Rudi is entirely right. You called tax payers and those protesting who take issue, outraged idiots. Public statement of fact I'm afraid.

The conversation is primarily about how in a two party system, clicking your fingers and removing corruption is far from a formality. It's not an 'SJW' issue, it's systemic and an an extent happens across the political spectrum.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 1.14am)

You say that she likely pays 'more' than 'the average outraged idiot pays', implying that said 'idiots' more than likely pay some tax, hence are tax payers. You're being purposefully disingenuous.

You state that it will be 'outraged idiots' assembling outside parliament. You also call those wishing to start a movement or react in some way 'toddlers'.

You're now saying that they are still in fact idiots in your view, but may also be 'something else'. It's absurd comment, after absurd comment.

There's no point going back and forth on facts.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 1.39am)

"Any remittance that she pays is likely more than the average outraged idiot pays. Nobody else really cares."

"If enough of you outraged idiots assemble outside Parliament and protest about the non dom law, it will get changed."

None of that related to one person. You have literally said that people that have a problem with this are outraged idiots, and that it's indicative of who would protest it.

"I didn't state that anyone would assemble outside Parliament."

See above. You're arguing with yourself again.

On this very page you say "if the idiots go and protest, they will have done something, instead of being just idiots." so you're still sweepingly calling people with a view contrary to yours idiots (while simultaneously being affronted that people would accuse you of that). You can't get enough of doing so, and across multiple threads have this ridiculous 'prove that I mean what I've clearly just said' approach.

"I didn't call anyone a toddler"... "I suggested his toddler mates might help. He brought up 4 year olds."

Aka you did call people that.

I don't care what you call people, but you repeatedly come out with this outlandish stuff and are then indignant when any of what you say is quoted back. These coin toss takes with accompanying endless pages of pearl clutching and claims of "lies! misrepresentation!" that follow are a complete waste of time. Post what you're happy with and actually believe - it's a bit late to rewind after the fact.

Edited by BlueJay (18 Apr 2022 5.21pm)

What are you drivelling on about now? You post one word from one of my posts and that bilge. You carry on defending and apologising for the Sunaks. We know who the mug is.

COYP

Incorrect again, she paid UK tax on her UK earnings in addition to paying a fee for non dom status.

She has UK income from at least one company, Catamaran Ventures UK and paid tax on that.

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.