This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Matov 12 Apr 20 4.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ex hibitionist
2nd ref wasn't policy as a vote winner, he believed in the policy, and the majority of voters voted for parties who wanted remain or 2nd ref, it's the way our system is skewered towards key seats that made opposing brexit a disaster, but I get that the will of the people had been expressed and it can't be over-rided, Starmer gets that now, calling him a moron may make you feel better about yourself but he's a damn sight smarter than either you or I If the policy was not a vote winner then why include it in an election in which, or at least this is how I understand them but feel free to correct me, the idea is to get more votes than anybody else? Because if you do push for such a policy, knowing it is not a vote winner, then that makes you far more stupid than me.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Apr 20 4.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
There was certainly an implication it was being misused, which is the criticism Starmer has levelled at the government. At yesterday's Number 10 press briefing, the Health Secretary said that the UK supply of PPE stretch to meet demand if the 'precious resource' is 'used in line with our guidance'. If they are reporting lack of PPE, is the health secretary saying they NHS aren’t using it in their guidance? Seeing as from the front line we are hearing there is a lack, how do you feel it would be appropriate for the leader of the opposition to raise this? There are clearly challenges apropos the availability of PPE and all the Health Secretary was stressing is that it should used in line with the guidance.I never interpreted his comments as an accusation that it was being mis-used.It was just common-sense advice as far as I am concerned. Keir Starmer's comments represent a different interpretation and far as I am concerned a mis-representation.The Government are doing everything in their power in relation to the procurement and delivery of PPE and perhaps Mr Starmer is aware of their efforts but still chooses to make political points at a time of national unity. I believe I have expressed my opinion on this matter with clarity and I really have nothing more to add to the debate on this issue. A difference of opinion but polarised viewpoints add to the cut and thrust of debate and can add value to such hallowed sites.Happy Easter! Edited by Willo (12 Apr 2020 4.18pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 12 Apr 20 4.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
There are clearly challenges apropos the availability of PPE and all the Health Secretary was stressing is that it should used in line with the guidance.I never interpreted his comments as an accusation that it was being mis-used.It was just common-sense advice as far as I am concerned. Keir Starmer's comments represent a different interpretation and far as I am concerned a mis-representation.The Government are doing everything in their power in relation to the procurement and delivery of PPE and perhaps Mr Starmer is aware of their efforts but still chooses to make political points at a time of national unity. Unity doesn’t equal impunity. Unify around the work the NHS are doing and the guidelines already set out by the government, which is correct. Hancock says there is enough PPE, NHS front line is saying their isn’t enough, leader of the opposition has a responsibility to raise now so something can either be done about it (ordering more, improving distribution around the country) or at least by raising now, it is on record for any future enquiry. He made very clear in his comments these are unprecedented times and said he didn’t want to give the impression this was easy, but it still needs to be questioned why we are hearing one thing from the Health Sec and another from the front line. Sometimes feels complains of political point scoring from HMG MPs are an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Conservative MP Lucy Allen on her twitter saying Kier’s comments are ‘attacking NHS England’ is frankly laughable.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 12 Apr 20 5.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
He made very clear in his comments these are unprecedented times and said he didn’t want to give the impression this was easy, but it still needs to be questioned why we are hearing one thing from the Health Sec and another from the front line.
I don't know if the complaints are reasonable or not, but what I do know is that there is a lot of Labour and left activism within the NHS.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SavoyTruffle 12 Apr 20 5.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I don't know if the complaints are reasonable or not , but what I do know is that there is a lot of Labour and left activism within the NHS. ... but il make an accusation of them not being honest actors regardless... Edited by SavoyTruffle (12 Apr 2020 5.10pm) Edited by SavoyTruffle (12 Apr 2020 5.11pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 12 Apr 20 5.22pm | |
---|---|
Mental how Keir is coming under more scrutiny on here than the actual person in charge of the country and his government.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 Apr 20 5.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Mental how Keir is coming under more scrutiny on here than the actual person in charge of the country and his government. Yes, I too was thinking he's getting far more attention than he really deserves.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 12 Apr 20 7.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Mental how Keir is coming under more scrutiny on here than the actual person in charge of the country and his government.
He can do what he wants, faces no challenges to his authority and in short is the absolute Alpha at the moment with his recent spell in hospital probably adding to that. Now of course that might change but Starmer is by far the more interesting proposition when it comes to the slings and arrows of the sort of bulls*** a sad few of us like to indulge in. He heads a Labour Party in complete meltdown. An utter basket case that has lost not only Scotland but also a huge chunk of its Northern heartlands in a 5 year period. Its tribal vote that it considered rock-solid absolutely smashed. It is a bear pit internecine warfare and where there is blood in the water, the Sharks circle. You want politics as a kind of soap-opera for ugly people then Labour is the only show in town. As matters stand, or rather stood up until a month or so again, it is f***ed. Utterly. With perhaps the most intriguing part that this current crisis might have thrown it a life-line. That all the state-interventionist wet dreams of the Corbynites are coming to fruition. Labour could, if they have the brains at the top, exploit this. Absolutely put the Tories on the ropes over the next 5 years, prod at the wounds that will open up. Or, as I suspect, just implode. Lets see. But Starmer is the new boy in town now. Got the shiny new badge. Has he got the chest for it though? I have my serious doubts about his wider political nous but perhaps I will be proved wrong. Who knows? Everything is up in the air at the moment.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 12 Apr 20 7.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
Mental how Keir is coming under more scrutiny on here than the actual person in charge of the country and his government. It is his thread !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dynamicdick Dormansland 12 Apr 20 8.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SavoyTruffle
Unity doesn’t equal impunity. Unify around the work the NHS are doing and the guidelines already set out by the government, which is correct. Hancock says there is enough PPE, NHS front line is saying their isn’t enough, leader of the opposition has a responsibility to raise now so something can either be done about it (ordering more, improving distribution around the country) or at least by raising now, it is on record for any future enquiry. He made very clear in his comments these are unprecedented times and said he didn’t want to give the impression this was easy, but it still needs to be questioned why we are hearing one thing from the Health Sec and another from the front line. Sometimes feels complains of political point scoring from HMG MPs are an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Conservative MP Lucy Allen on her twitter saying Kier’s comments are ‘attacking NHS England’ is frankly laughable. Starmer is political points scoring and yes he is in the main raising the PPE issue now for ‘future enquiry’ . This is where the political points scoring comes into play.
Bring back Brolin |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 12 Apr 20 9.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
Starmer is political points scoring and yes he is in the main raising the PPE issue now for ‘future enquiry’ . This is where the political points scoring comes into play. I say!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 12 Apr 20 9.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
Starmer is political points scoring and yes he is in the main raising the PPE issue now for ‘future enquiry’ . This is where the political points scoring comes into play. You do realise how many cages you have probably rattled don’t you? Well said
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.