This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Dec 19 2.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Wisbech that is your opinion not everyone agrees with it. Unless I am mistakened not one of the MPs who changed parties was re-elected they either retired or lost. You have an idealised version of what Parliament should be and in theory it would be great if it worked that way. But as I just posted on the Brexit thread for example Labour's position to oppose any Tory Brexit deal before it had even been negotiated is the reality of Parliament. Politicians are partisan and oppose the other side even when the other side is talking sense. By all means continue to call for MPs to be independent of the party machine but you will be howling in the wind. I wish you luck it's not a bad thing if it ever happened. A more realistic solution is to vote for independent MPs. I have a friend who is an independent councillor in Froome where all seats are held by local independent people and the public love it. I am very well aware that there are few on here who agree with me for the obvious reason that this place is dominated by a particular viewpoint. That though doesn't mean that I am wrong or there aren't others in the wider world who do agree, although I freely acknowledge that it is a subject that needs more exposure to become better understood. Something which a large Tory majority may well produce. We face a long period without any kind of effective opposition. Lord Grade just suggested on Radio 4 that as the BBC would be filling that role in the coming years with their responsibility for critical analysis, we can anticipate further Tory attacks on them and threats to their independence. I think he may well be right. Yes my views are idealistic but where is the downside of that? We ought to aspire to the ideal whilst being pragmatic in how we approach it. If we can improve the way things work then we should. If there is a drift towards an undesirable situation which puts too much power in the hands of an elite unseen few, of whatever political stripe, then we all ought to oppose it, whatever our own politics might be. Unless the funding basis for elections was totally changed we could never see enough independents in Parliament to hold power. My own County Councillor is an independent and a friend of mine. He is very active locally and extremely visible, attending local events, meetings, pub quizzes and football matches. He also chairs the planning committee. He does a cracking job and is returned each election by a overwhelming majority. Politically we share many views. He cannot understand why so many in Cornwall voted to leave when EU funding has been so important to the economy here and he is extremely concerned about the impact of Brexit. He is, of course, better placed to understand this than most others. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (16 Dec 2019 3.01pm)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Dec 19 3.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Depends. For my money all that flag-waving and wearing silly costumes is more an expression of a lack of confidence in your national identity. The patriotic equivilent of people obsessed with designer labels and so on. English nationalism will be about seizing power. About taking control of specifically English only institutions. Not an exercise in Morris dancing and eating Pork Pies. And not necessarily a guarantee that the Right would triumph. A strong case could be made for a new manifestation of England being a Republic. Even full-on socialist. I get peoples ire about why other displays of nationalism are cheered on whilst English ones are treated with disdain but I would urge a little caution around making it a defining issue. I know of Irish people who find all the hype around St Patricks day to be more than patronising and certainly not representing how they see the modern Irish state. English nationalism worries me because it appeals so much to the part of me that craves radical change. Perhaps this might be self-regarding nonsense but having learnt the hard way that the saying 'be careful for what you wish' is rooted in our collective psyches for good reason. I would urge you relish the contempt of the left. Turn it around and rub their faces in it because as things stand, at least for today, our side is winning. Celebrate that because these things can change in a heart beat. I get some of these concerns, though I differ. Nationalism is a concept, a stereotype, and like all stereotypes it suffers from generalization. It exists as a binding force for commonalities. That's said, holistically it's all rather binary. Without English nationalism....within a global system the English will wither and fade away into the genetic grey. Japan are an example of an island race who saw that possibility and successfully placed blocks in the way. What you won't advocate for you will eventually lose anyway.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Dec 19 3.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
We have a party system because we are essentially a tribal society. Even if you removed the party system, alliances would form based on various views and self interests. Therefore the good of the alliance tends to come before the individual whatever its nature. All true (except the bit about being a member of a "mob". True, but besides the point. That you think it is just shows that you don't understand it. It isn't why people vote as they do, but the responsibility of the MP they choose that matters. To repeat my old mantra. MPs are NOT delegates. They are representatives.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 16 Dec 19 3.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
All true (except the bit about being a member of a "mob". True, but besides the point. That you think it is just shows that you don't understand it. It isn't why people vote as they do, but the responsibility of the MP they choose that matters. To repeat my old mantra. MPs are NOT delegates. They are representatives. This might well be true but the caliber of the MP is not much of a consideration for most in a general election. Their responsibility exists be they are worthy of it or not. I don't see how you can deny that an organisation that has its own website and list of aims is not another alliance whether you consider the term 'mob' appropriate or not. You can dress it up as whatever you like.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 16 Dec 19 3.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
All true (except the bit about being a member of a "mob". True, but besides the point. That you think it is just shows that you don't understand it. It isn't why people vote as they do, but the responsibility of the MP they choose that matters. To repeat my old mantra. MPs are NOT delegates. They are representatives. In nearly every post you have written today, you have insinuated that certain posters on here are wrong and do not understand. That, of course, is your prerogative. You have also criticised them for not saying , they might be wrong. I cannot recall you saying you might be wrong. You do talk down to people and act like you always know best, before bemoaning how people reply to you, perhaps take a long hard look in a mirror.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 16 Dec 19 3.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
English nationalism will be about seizing power. About taking control of specifically English only institutions. Not an exercise in Morris dancing and eating Pork Pies. ....not that there is anything wrong with Morris dancing and eating pork pies, eh?
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 16 Dec 19 3.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
In nearly every post you have written today, you have insinuated that certain posters on here are wrong and do not understand. That, of course, is your prerogative. You have also criticised them for not saying , they might be wrong. I cannot recall you saying you might be wrong. You do talk down to people and act like you always know best, before bemoaning how people reply to you, perhaps take a long hard look in a mirror. Sounds like Ash Sarkar, the communist activist. ‘The politics is right, the people are wrong.’ Some people never grow out of student thinking. Some people will always be the same. They can’t change.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 16 Dec 19 3.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
All true (except the bit about being a member of a "mob". True, but besides the point. That you think it is just shows that you don't understand it. It isn't why people vote as they do, but the responsibility of the MP they choose that matters. To repeat my old mantra. MPs are NOT delegates. They are representatives. They represent their parties.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 16 Dec 19 3.56pm | |
---|---|
Extreme non PC & Snowflake/leftie upsetting, BUT, its over. Voting done, people spoke(voted), Ruskies didnt get a look in(not as enjoyable as the US), can the 'losers' now accept this defeat & let this country get back to what it was & should be(oh, & out of Europe). Just saying
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
robdave2k 16 Dec 19 4.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
All true (except the bit about being a member of a "mob". True, but besides the point. That you think it is just shows that you don't understand it. It isn't why people vote as they do, but the responsibility of the MP they choose that matters. To repeat my old mantra. MPs are NOT delegates. They are representatives. From the UK Parliament Website "The UK public elects Members of Parliament (MPs) to represent their interests and concerns in the House of Commons. MPs consider and can propose new laws as well as raising issues that matter to you in the House. This includes asking government ministers questions about current issues including those which affect local constituents" The point being is that if they are to represent the people then voting during a bill to remain when you represent a leave constituency is not democratic. Ignoring the national basis then if an MP is representing on a local level this goes against the grain too. I notice your mention of your friend who is a local county councillor who is also the Chair of the Planning Committee and can't understand why so many voted for Brexit. Here's a clue for you - he probably hasn't got a low cost housing estate going up in his road. You accuse everyone else of living in a bubble, yet can acknowledge no viewpoint but your own and I've always tended to find talking down to someone isn't the way to engage them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 16 Dec 19 4.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The guy who suggests I promoted "elitism" has no idea what he is talking about. Believing in the supremacy of Parliament and for our elected representatives to be free to decide for themselves what is best for their constituents, and the country as a whole, is not elitism. It is a belief in democracy itself and not in the drift towards the kind of pseudo dictatorship we are witnessing. If there is any elitism to be seen it's to be found there, in the hands of those wielding the levers and taking the behind the scenes decisions whilst the system whips the sheep through the lobbies. Johnson wasn't chosen by his MPs at all. It was the 200,000 or so Tory party members who did that. Who selected the candidates is another question but my understanding is that they all had to commit to supporting the manifesto 100% or they would not be chosen. So much for the one nation "broad church" Tory party of old. It's now bleat our way or you will be in the abattoir tomorrow. Stirling could be a gal.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 16 Dec 19 4.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by becky
....not that there is anything wrong with Morris dancing and eating pork pies, eh? I love pork pies. Not so keen on Scotch eggs.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.