This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 02 Jul 14 10.40pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stuk at 02 Jul 2014 4.45pm
I don't think it should be considered at all. Not in these cases, nor any others. Justice is supposed to be equal to all. Maybe only when it serves the 'public interest', and relates to minor offences. Sometimes its probably better not to send someone to prison, if its in societies best interest to pursue an more productive alternative. But for a serial sex offender. No way.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 03 Jul 14 12.01am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Jul 2014 11.26am
Quote Stirlingsays at 02 Jul 2014 10.24am
Quote Superfly at 02 Jul 2014 10.04am
Disagree - that's precisely how it works. Initial estimates are that his painting have dropped by 90% in value. And when was the last time you heard a Gary Glitter record played?
Still, the reality is that art is art and how people respond to it differs. Berry's music is still played......The BBC have art by a pedophile right outside their entrance....If I remember correctly. Glitter's music is played around the world.....The man doesn't have to work.....I think he made £130,000 thanks to his music being played during the NBA finals. Initial estimates by who? They aren't worth anything. Hitler's paintings weren't put in the bin you know.....And he wasn't that good. If I remember correctly one of his went for nearly a hundred grand a few years back. There is a very healthy market in 'black art'. The price of 'Jim'll Fix it' badges, has risen dramatically in the last few years. Whilst the art value of Rolf's works will drop in the short term, chances are that there are people who collect objects of interest related to notorious criminals: esp when the individual has died, and the stigma about profiting from such objects diminishes. The face value may have decreased, unique, one of objects such as a painting by a celebrity criminal will hold its value very well, especially in certain markets. You woulnd't have got a fiver for a hitler painting in 1945, now, they go for a hundred grand, and he couldn't paint. The art world isn't exactly strangers to people who were deviants, perverts and weirdos.
For this shameless plagiarism of my art, expect to hear from my lawyers.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 03 Jul 14 12.17am | |
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 03 Jul 2014 12.01am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Jul 2014 11.26am
Quote Stirlingsays at 02 Jul 2014 10.24am
Quote Superfly at 02 Jul 2014 10.04am
Disagree - that's precisely how it works. Initial estimates are that his painting have dropped by 90% in value. And when was the last time you heard a Gary Glitter record played?
Still, the reality is that art is art and how people respond to it differs. Berry's music is still played......The BBC have art by a pedophile right outside their entrance....If I remember correctly. Glitter's music is played around the world.....The man doesn't have to work.....I think he made £130,000 thanks to his music being played during the NBA finals. Initial estimates by who? They aren't worth anything. Hitler's paintings weren't put in the bin you know.....And he wasn't that good. If I remember correctly one of his went for nearly a hundred grand a few years back. There is a very healthy market in 'black art'. The price of 'Jim'll Fix it' badges, has risen dramatically in the last few years. Whilst the art value of Rolf's works will drop in the short term, chances are that there are people who collect objects of interest related to notorious criminals: esp when the individual has died, and the stigma about profiting from such objects diminishes. The face value may have decreased, unique, one of objects such as a painting by a celebrity criminal will hold its value very well, especially in certain markets. You woulnd't have got a fiver for a hitler painting in 1945, now, they go for a hundred grand, and he couldn't paint. The art world isn't exactly strangers to people who were deviants, perverts and weirdos.
For this shameless plagiarism of my art, expect to hear from my lawyers.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dingdong bognor regis 03 Jul 14 5.20am | |
---|---|
makes you sick don.t it.molesters and peados getting all that kind of money. they should be made to give the money to the victims
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Sir James Hird Mount Martha 03 Jul 14 6.15am | |
---|---|
Skippy has now come out and has told of being tied down while he did it and then had the audacity to sing about it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 03 Jul 14 10.37am | |
---|---|
Quote Cucking Funt at 03 Jul 2014 12.01am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Jul 2014 11.26am
Quote Stirlingsays at 02 Jul 2014 10.24am
Quote Superfly at 02 Jul 2014 10.04am
Disagree - that's precisely how it works. Initial estimates are that his painting have dropped by 90% in value. And when was the last time you heard a Gary Glitter record played?
Still, the reality is that art is art and how people respond to it differs. Berry's music is still played......The BBC have art by a pedophile right outside their entrance....If I remember correctly. Glitter's music is played around the world.....The man doesn't have to work.....I think he made £130,000 thanks to his music being played during the NBA finals. Initial estimates by who? They aren't worth anything. Hitler's paintings weren't put in the bin you know.....And he wasn't that good. If I remember correctly one of his went for nearly a hundred grand a few years back. There is a very healthy market in 'black art'. The price of 'Jim'll Fix it' badges, has risen dramatically in the last few years. Whilst the art value of Rolf's works will drop in the short term, chances are that there are people who collect objects of interest related to notorious criminals: esp when the individual has died, and the stigma about profiting from such objects diminishes. The face value may have decreased, unique, one of objects such as a painting by a celebrity criminal will hold its value very well, especially in certain markets. You woulnd't have got a fiver for a hitler painting in 1945, now, they go for a hundred grand, and he couldn't paint. The art world isn't exactly strangers to people who were deviants, perverts and weirdos.
For this shameless plagiarism of my art, expect to hear from my lawyers. I'll be changing my name to Rebecca Brookes, expect to pay a hefty cash settlement to me, for my abuse of your legal rights.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 03 Jul 14 10.39am | |
---|---|
Quote Jimenez at 03 Jul 2014 12.17am
Quote Cucking Funt at 03 Jul 2014 12.01am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 02 Jul 2014 11.26am
Quote Stirlingsays at 02 Jul 2014 10.24am
Quote Superfly at 02 Jul 2014 10.04am
Disagree - that's precisely how it works. Initial estimates are that his painting have dropped by 90% in value. And when was the last time you heard a Gary Glitter record played?
Still, the reality is that art is art and how people respond to it differs. Berry's music is still played......The BBC have art by a pedophile right outside their entrance....If I remember correctly. Glitter's music is played around the world.....The man doesn't have to work.....I think he made £130,000 thanks to his music being played during the NBA finals. Initial estimates by who? They aren't worth anything. Hitler's paintings weren't put in the bin you know.....And he wasn't that good. If I remember correctly one of his went for nearly a hundred grand a few years back. There is a very healthy market in 'black art'. The price of 'Jim'll Fix it' badges, has risen dramatically in the last few years. Whilst the art value of Rolf's works will drop in the short term, chances are that there are people who collect objects of interest related to notorious criminals: esp when the individual has died, and the stigma about profiting from such objects diminishes. The face value may have decreased, unique, one of objects such as a painting by a celebrity criminal will hold its value very well, especially in certain markets. You woulnd't have got a fiver for a hitler painting in 1945, now, they go for a hundred grand, and he couldn't paint. The art world isn't exactly strangers to people who were deviants, perverts and weirdos.
For this shameless plagiarism of my art, expect to hear from my lawyers. And I never thought I would ever think good of Garry Glitter.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 03 Jul 14 10.47am | |
---|---|
Quote dingdong at 03 Jul 2014 5.20am
makes you sick don.t it.molesters and peados getting all that kind of money. they should be made to give the money to the victims
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 03 Jul 14 10.59am | |
---|---|
Quote dingdong at 03 Jul 2014 5.20am
makes you sick don.t it.molesters and peados getting all that kind of money. they should be made to give the money to the victims No. They earned it, despite his dispicable acts there is no doubting that both were very hard working entertainers (and I'd consider his child molestation to be the lesser of Glitters crimes). Its important to remember that they're not being punished for being s**t musicians or entertainers, but for being sex offenders - the two are seperate. Who the f**k pays to play Glitters music or sample it, s**t second rate hack bands. Thats how s**t Oasis are, they paid Garry Glitter for a sample. The good news is, once they're convicted they're liable for compensation claims from their victims, so you can take some respite from the fact that they're going to lose their fortunes.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 03 Jul 14 11.24am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 03 Jul 2014 10.59am
The good news is, once they're convicted they're liable for compensation claims from their victims, so you can take some respite from the fact that they're going to lose their fortunes.
Still, I think there is a huge hypocrisy within society and a denial of reality over pedophiles/nounces/child molesters...Whatever we call them.... Apparently if you are gay or straight your sexuality is quite set to some degree. Now society accepts that and it's frequently mentioned that there is a genetic propensity to sexuality....Anyone with half a brain could see that anyway. But if you fancy the youngsters it means that you're evil and it's a choice.....This is a tricky thing to type about....And I should again state that personally I think we have to deal with underage sex (seniors with minors) or abuse with prison sentences. Though I want to point out that some twit shagging a 15 year old isn't the same as a pedo abusing an under ten......Everyone gives it the same treatment which is just nonsense....Both wrong but it's on different scales. I think for the majority of people they chose to not think of any grey areas and just go for the full on black and white of 'hang em' the perverts. These people are damaging to any civil society. But so many people fail to appreciate that they have always been here and that 'nature' isn't interested in how we wish to structure society or how we would wish people to be. It's like everything else, people are born with propensities. Environment and most importantly upbringing can alter that somewhat but tendencies are there all the same. Just like some people are born smarter than the average or more violent or likely to be straight or gay.....Some are born likely to be child molesters...And again importantly some have upbringings that make it more likely that they will become one....Some tendencies just don't work for the society we wish to create...Worked in ancient China but not here. It's what we do with them that is the tricky and sometimes hypocritical thing.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Helmet46 Croydon 03 Jul 14 1.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 03 Jul 2014 11.24am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 03 Jul 2014 10.59am
The good news is, once they're convicted they're liable for compensation claims from their victims, so you can take some respite from the fact that they're going to lose their fortunes.
Still, I think there is a huge hypocrisy within society and a denial of reality over pedophiles/nounces/child molesters...Whatever we call them.... Apparently if you are gay or straight your sexuality is quite set to some degree. Now society accepts that and it's frequently mentioned that there is a genetic propensity to sexuality....Anyone with half a brain could see that anyway. But if you fancy the youngsters it means that you're evil and it's a choice.....This is a tricky thing to type about....And I should again state that personally I think we have to deal with underage sex (seniors with minors) or abuse with prison sentences. Though I want to point out that some twit shagging a 15 year old isn't the same as a pedo abusing an under ten......Everyone gives it the same treatment which is just nonsense....Both wrong but it's on different scales. I think for the majority of people they chose to not think of any grey areas and just go for the full on black and white of 'hang em' the perverts. These people are damaging to any civil society. But so many people fail to appreciate that they have always been here and that 'nature' isn't interested in how we wish to structure society or how we would wish people to be. It's like everything else, people are born with propensities. Environment and most importantly upbringing can alter that somewhat but tendencies are there all the same. Just like some people are born smarter than the average or more violent or likely to be straight or gay.....Some are born likely to be child molesters...And again importantly some have upbringings that make it more likely that they will become one....Some tendencies just don't work for the society we wish to create...Worked in ancient China but not here. It's what we do with them that is the tricky and sometimes hypocritical thing.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ghosteagle 03 Jul 14 2.07pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 03 Jul 2014 11.24am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 03 Jul 2014 10.59am
The good news is, once they're convicted they're liable for compensation claims from their victims, so you can take some respite from the fact that they're going to lose their fortunes.
Still, I think there is a huge hypocrisy within society and a denial of reality over pedophiles/nounces/child molesters...Whatever we call them.... Apparently if you are gay or straight your sexuality is quite set to some degree. Now society accepts that and it's frequently mentioned that there is a genetic propensity to sexuality....Anyone with half a brain could see that anyway. But if you fancy the youngsters it means that you're evil and it's a choice.....This is a tricky thing to type about....And I should again state that personally I think we have to deal with underage sex (seniors with minors) or abuse with prison sentences. Though I want to point out that some twit shagging a 15 year old isn't the same as a pedo abusing an under ten......Everyone gives it the same treatment which is just nonsense....Both wrong but it's on different scales. I think for the majority of people they chose to not think of any grey areas and just go for the full on black and white of 'hang em' the perverts. These people are damaging to any civil society. But so many people fail to appreciate that they have always been here and that 'nature' isn't interested in how we wish to structure society or how we would wish people to be. It's like everything else, people are born with propensities. Environment and most importantly upbringing can alter that somewhat but tendencies are there all the same. Just like some people are born smarter than the average or more violent or likely to be straight or gay.....Some are born likely to be child molesters...And again importantly some have upbringings that make it more likely that they will become one....Some tendencies just don't work for the society we wish to create...Worked in ancient China but not here. It's what we do with them that is the tricky and sometimes hypocritical thing.
I didn't think sexual orientation was a choice?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.