So how will brexit be delivered on a second vote?

Good question with an easy answer.

There will be legally binding and detailed, well thought out options which already have inherent approval of parliament.

This was the huge failure of the 2016 vote as there was no approved method to implement the exit. You have seen the result of that for 3 years now.

Before a second vote legislation needs to be be put in place to ensure whatever option is picked there is a smooth mechanism to implement it.

Be that a no deal exit, be that may’s deal, or be that remaining in the EU but with specific measures to carefully examine our standing in the EU as a lot of people clearly are unhappy with that.

Kier Starmer recently said that over 150 Labour MPs wouldn’t vote for the potential agreement thrashed out between Jezza and Tezza without a so called “confirmatory vote”. That’s even if an agreement can actually be reached. Customs union is a huge sticking point.

MPs are bottling it, I completely agree with you there. Hundreds of them are not willing to implement brexit as they think millions of people were conned.

Ironically if the leave campaign had a little more integrity and ran a more honest effort, we might have left the EU already.

People like Farage are trying to say everyone understood a vote to leave in 2016 was a vote in support of a no deal exit but I think that is a huge lie.

Millions of people who voted to leave did not think they were voting for a no deal exit, they listened to David Davis and whoever else who said how easy a “deal” would be.

However millions of people probably actually did vote for a no deal exit.

But with enormous consequences and differences between may’s soft brexit, and a hard no deal brexit, there is no way all 17 ish million people voted for the same option.

Hence MPs cannot deliver one or the other of those options.

Hence you need a second vote.

Wisbech is entitled to his opinion but I don’t agree with that concept.

Politicians are unable to decide, Teddy.

That’s not hyperbole, it’s a fact. Look at the last 3 years.

Whether or not people think a second vote will somehow reverse brexit entirely, is moot. You may absolutely love the idea of a second vote, or you may absolutely detest that idea.

That matters not, as at this stage a second vote is the only route to an actual resolution one way or the other.

You eliminate the problems in the planning.

Every option would have inerrant approval of parliament already.

Obviously there is no point doing this if it leads to another 3 years of failed negotiations and votes.

Every single option on that ballot would be pre agreed with all parties, including the EU, so there is no bulls*** once the vote happens.

There are legal mechanisms to ensure whatever is picked has a smooth route to implementation.

That was the failure of 2016 - no route to implementation.

As Starmer said, there needs to be a confirmatory vote.

MPs are looking to give the final decision to the electorate.

MPs in parliament can craft the second vote exactly as I said because just because you agree to legislate that a vote for a no deal exit will have a route to implementation, doesn’t mean it will definitely happen. You are just agreeing that if it is picked, it will have a route to implementation.

Every leave or remain MP has stated quite openly that a confirmatory vote would lead to one final resolution, if it’s what they want, or not.

They are not “agreeing several options” they are agreeing to honor a second vote, where one of those several options will actually be selected.

Either way, if the second vote cannot be crafted in this way, to have clear routes to implementation, then it has no value at all.

If that is the case then who knows what the final resolution will be.