This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Aug 23 3.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
My post was in response to you making a gratuitous remark about Harmsworth's wealth somehow being protected by the Tories. It was you that introduced Harmsworth to the thread, not me. How were Lord Northcliffe and Louise Owen behaving irresponsibly or being 'sexually provocative' in having a personal relationship? Harmsworth and the Mail are joined at the hip. The comment was in response to ideas about why the Mail adopted their positions on topics. So relevant. You having a distant relative isn’t. Maybe you don’t think someone taking a mistress at that time wasn’t provocative or irresponsible but I bet a few did back then. It was a joke that seems to have touched a raw nerve or two.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 31 Aug 23 3.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Let’s hope they understand the need for it rather better than you seem to and aren’t so silly as to listen to all the nonsense spread by the anti-vax brigade. Lets hope people make informed decisions about their body and not listen to any scare mongering propaganda....from either side...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 31 Aug 23 3.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Unquestionably true but complaining isn’t going to help. Only providing evidence to the enquiry can do that. I know I was relevantly lucky, being retired and living where I do. It’s just that stage of my life. I have lived in very different circumstances at other stages. Me too and I can't imagine being holed up for months in some of the dumps I had to live in but that's not the issue. Are those who had to put up with those conditions going to be asked for their input? Complaining is all they've got.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 31 Aug 23 3.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Lets hope people make informed decisions about their body and not listen to any scare mongering propaganda....from either side... Sure Problem is most people are simply incapable of making balanced, informed decisions. Luckily, there's always natural selection to fall back on.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 31 Aug 23 3.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Sure Problem is most people are simply incapable of making balanced, informed decisions. Luckily, there's always natural selection to fall back on. I'm hoping that's sarcasm because that's exactly what isn't happening. Let's not forget of course that amongst the largest groups, percentage wise, refusing vaccines were Phds. But hey. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Aug 2023 3.50pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 31 Aug 23 3.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Me too and I can't imagine being holed up for months in some of the dumps I had to live in but that's not the issue. Are those who had to put up with those conditions going to be asked for their input? Complaining is all they've got. No one has their back anymore. Labour dumped them once Blair took over and Corbyn (fruitcake though he was) and co have been rinsed from the party.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 31 Aug 23 4.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
I see there is a new "variant" strain just in time to scare people into getting another booster. Wonder what the uptake will be. Just like the flu. Weird that. Almost like viruses are constantly changing and evolving If the call was to make sure all 'people' got vaccinated again, regardless of age, I'd share your cynicism. But it's not. It's the same as the flu vaccine push year on year on year. Most vulnerable individuals and those over a certain age. As we all know, you don't have to get a booster to have immunity, you can get that from a previous infection. However your immunity level will be significantly weaker than someone who has been vaccinated after infection, or someone who has regular vaccines. Mainly due to germinal centres within your lymph nodes and how long they last and how they work, but that's something for you to look up and understand better. For the average healthy and (relatively) young individual arguably annual boosters are not essential. Helpful maybe to yourself and others, but not essential. Much like the flu vaccine – the takeup rate under ~35 in the UK is fairly poor. Once you start getting into more vulnerable age bands, unsurprisingly take up increases. Quite rightly it's up to you to decide what to do once you start getting into those age bands and high risk profiles, but based on current studies and data, the risk of serious infection and complications increases massively if you're in that group and you decide to regularly pass on flu or covid boosters. Natural selection etc
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 31 Aug 23 4.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'm hoping that's sarcasm because that's exactly what isn't happening. Let's not forget of course that amongst the largest groups, percentage wise, refusing vaccines were Phds. But hey. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Aug 2023 3.50pm) It's a broader point that also applies to this. Happens every day, although not enough evidently Elaborate on second point?
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 31 Aug 23 4.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
It's a broader point that also applies to this. Happens every day, although not enough evidently Elaborate on second point? Obviously If natural selection were a factor in modern times there would be an increase in fitness, not the decline that we see.....Medical science is wonderful but some of the lesser told truths about unhealthy people reproducing don't go away just because people don't like to say. Reality is that natural selection has been in decline for well over a hundred years. You want the phd link? Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Aug 2023 4.20pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 31 Aug 23 4.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Obviously If natural selection were a factor in modern times there would be an increase in fitness, not the decline that we see.....Medical science is wonderful but some of the lesser told truths about unhealthy people reproducing don't go away just because people don't like to say. Reality is that natural selection has been in decline for well over a hundred years. You want the phd link? Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Aug 2023 4.20pm) I wasn't talking strictly medically. General life success criteria, earnings, success and so on. And yes you do have a valid point about the negative effects of sustaining people that socially would be better off out of the gene pool, but that's closer to eugenics than perhaps you'd want to be. Or maybe you do, who knows. As for getting fitter and fitter, there is a limit here – I think you mean as a society the proportion of people getting to a high level of 'fitness' or more specifically optimal health. I'm not sure about your claim that we've been in decline for a century... just take a look at the life expectancy statistics for example from 1900-2000s. Survey, malnutrition and so on. It's certainly better to be born now than 100 years hence. Re. link – it would have been better to link to the study itself rather than the DAILY MAIL but fine Interesting study though. It would be even more interesting to revisit those questioned in 2021 to see if their stance has softened, which the article implies started to happen in certain groups. Also worth noting that vaccine 'hesitancy' is not the same as vaccine 'rejection'. It's not a stretch to consider that educated individuals, usually strong on critical analysis and objective approaches wanted to fully interrogate a broader range of studies and data before vaccination. It's also worth noting that a PhD can be awarded for carrying out original research in any field, not just medicine. What's the broader point you're trying to make off the back of it, though? Don't make me repeat causality/causation again
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 31 Aug 23 4.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
If the call was to make sure all 'people' got vaccinated again, regardless of age, I'd share your cynicism. But it's not. It's the same as the flu vaccine push year on year on year. Most vulnerable individuals and those over a certain age. As we all know, you don't have to get a booster to have immunity, you can get that from a previous infection. However your immunity level will be significantly weaker than someone who has been vaccinated after infection, or someone who has regular vaccines. Mainly due to germinal centres within your lymph nodes and how long they last and how they work, but that's something for you to look up and understand better. For the average healthy and (relatively) young individual arguably annual boosters are not essential. Helpful maybe to yourself and others, but not essential. Much like the flu vaccine – the takeup rate under ~35 in the UK is fairly poor. Once you start getting into more vulnerable age bands, unsurprisingly take up increases. Quite rightly it's up to you to decide what to do once you start getting into those age bands and high risk profiles, but based on current studies and data, the risk of serious infection and complications increases massively if you're in that group and you decide to regularly pass on flu or covid boosters. Natural selection etc Like I said in an earlier post hopefully people will make an informed decision to get or not to get the booster without fear mongering propaganda from either side. And we shall see what the uptake is like. By all means get it if you want I won't try to persuade you otherwise.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 31 Aug 23 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Like I said in an earlier post hopefully people will make an informed decision to get or not to get the booster without fear mongering propaganda from either side. And we shall see what the uptake is like. By all means get it if you want I won't try to persuade you otherwise. It's not aimed at me, and there's little evidence to say that I need it considering my vaccination status, age and health... I'm lucky enough not to be anywhere near that band just yet. My guess is that uptake will be similar to the flu vaccine % every year for the over 60s/vulnerable groups. As for everyone else, way below % compared with flu take up. Why? annual flu vaccines are suggested for all age groups not just the over 60s, whereas this years COVID booster is not. However it appears that if you've never had a vaccine, you'll be free to book one if you so wish, and get those germinal centres pumping. As you say, your choice. I just don't agree with the assertion that people (all people) are able to make informed decisions. I'd say it's a very small % of society. This thread is proof of that.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.