This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mapletree Croydon 13 Nov 20 11.47am | |
---|---|
We are reasonably interesting. As I said. Whereas the EU is a strategic target. Now watch the FDI change. Or I should say continue to change. There is less point now in basing yourself in the UK if you are a US firm. Your prime base either will be in your biggest EU market or in the country that is most easy to work out of. So Germany or Ireland.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 13 Nov 20 11.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The financial businesses are impacted by the political environment, which is all I am talking about. London as a financial centre won't disappear but it's significance as a gateway to the EU will, and it's importance will diminish. Leaving the EU does nothing to help the city. The language is irrelevant these days. You hear more English in a Frankfurt restaurant than German, and often better spoken too! If the talent goes then it won't be there anymore! The centre will be elsewhere. Not overnight, but in a few years. Before or after the sky has fallen in?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Nov 20 11.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The financial businesses are impacted by the political environment, which is all I am talking about. London as a financial centre won't disappear but it's significance as a gateway to the EU will, and it's importance will diminish. Leaving the EU does nothing to help the city. The language is irrelevant these days. You hear more English in a Frankfurt restaurant than German, and often better spoken too! If the talent goes then it won't be there anymore! The centre will be elsewhere. Not overnight, but in a few years. Like Switzerland then? Or not? U.K. didn’t join the Eurozone, London didn’t suffer. Leaving the EU, London doesn’t need to suffer either. And London has more to offer with its arts and entertainment and English education than the square mile.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Nov 20 11.54am | |
---|---|
Isn't it funny how he very same people who wanted to ignore the Brexit vote are the very same ones who are urging Trump to accept the result gracefully. The never ending hypocrisy of these people is quite astonishing. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Nov 2020 11.54am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Belmont 13 Nov 20 11.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The financial businesses are impacted by the political environment, which is all I am talking about. London as a financial centre won't disappear but it's significance as a gateway to the EU will, and it's importance will diminish. Leaving the EU does nothing to help the city. The language is irrelevant these days. You hear more English in a Frankfurt restaurant than German, and often better spoken too! If the talent goes then it won't be there anymore! The centre will be elsewhere. Not overnight, but in a few years. There is a reason that London is a financial hub and that is time zone, if the issue of passporting can be sorted I can't see the financial hub moving from London because where money is involved the big banks would have been leaving in droves already in my opinion if there was any hint of a threat to profits.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Nov 20 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Well, obviously I knew before I wrote that you know better than the #1 ranked Law course in the world. I just thought I would point out the Harvard view. The rest I already said. Jurisdiction is agreed when a bilateral or multilateral law is entered into. You can breach law of course. Then like anyone found in breach, the relevant Court will establish sanctions. It is extraordinarily rare for a country to do so as if you do it once you will probably do so again. Effectively you leave the club. The reason you joined that club is then lost to you. We never had one default after winning an international case, most of which were overseen by the ICC or other similar bodies Harvard also think that men can be women and that equity is better than equality (not that I accept either). Forgive me if I don't kneel before institutions you genuflect to. Nothing you said has altered the reality that 'international law' doesn't exist. Only agreements between countries that wish to sign up to them....there is zero universality. Many a time I heard that Blair and Bush broke this 'international law' over Iraq..what happened....Errrr.....Nothing. What happened to Germany and France when they broke 'international law'...which in reality are EU rules....Errrr...nothing. What happened to the USA when they broke 'international law'.....Errrr...nothing. The only sanctions that exist are particular to the specific agreement the signers agreed.....In reality it's the same as it ever was and rules are applied selectively dependent upon what is deemed convenient and expedient. International waffle more like. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2020 12.04pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Nov 20 12.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Belmont
There is a reason that London is a financial hub and that is time zone, if the issue of passporting can be sorted I can't see the financial hub moving from London because where money is involved the big banks would have been leaving in droves already in my opinion if there was any hint of a threat to profits. That French, German and EU threat and want to impose taxes on financial trades when George Osbourne was chancellor would’ve put the fear of God into financial institutions and shareholders. Like inhaling a bucket of sick to them.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Nov 20 12.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Many a time I heard that Blair and Bush broke this 'international law' over Iraq..what happened....Errrr.....Nothing. What happened to Germany and France when they broke 'international law'...which in reality are EU rules....Errrr...nothing. What happened to the USA when they broke 'international law'.....Errrr...nothing. The only sanctions that exist are particular to the specific agreement the signers agreed.....In reality it's the same as it ever was and rules are applied selectively dependent upon what is deemed convenient and expedient. International waffle more like. Oh yes. And rules not mattering when it’s usually France that wants to break them has been a big reason why Brits have had enough of it while we’ve abided by everything like teacher’s pets.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Nov 20 12.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am surprised you don't know! It's:- International Court of Justice The Judges are drawn from jurisdictions across the UN, including the UK. The way they are appointed can be found here:- [Link] The jurisdiction of the Court is wide. This extract appears to apply to the current discussion, although I am no lawyer:- c) Compulsory jurisdiction in legal disputes The Statute provides that a State may recognize as compulsory, in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court in legal disputes. Such cases are brought before the Court by means of written applications. The nature of legal disputes in relation to which such compulsory jurisdiction may be recognized are listed in Article 36, paragraphs 2-5, of the Statute, which read as follows: “2. The States parties to the present Statute may at any time declare that they recognize as compulsory ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other State accepting the same obligation, the jurisdiction of the Court in all legal disputes concerning: a) the interpretation of a treaty; Edited by Wisbech Eagle (13 Nov 2020 10.59am) What a joke. This court claiming claiming 'international law' is little more than a funded treaty that only has power over its signees and can only take action against those that aren't protected by the powerful. The organization has no police force or enforcement body. Oooh I wonder why....is it because 'international law' is in reality just a buzz phrase? Let's see: The US isn't a member. Fine words without power. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2020 12.16pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Nov 20 12.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Before or after the sky has fallen in? The sky won't fall in. It will just get cloudier and produce harder conditions than there needed to be.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Nov 20 12.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Like Switzerland then? Or not? U.K. didn’t join the Eurozone, London didn’t suffer. Leaving the EU, London doesn’t need to suffer either. And London has more to offer with its arts and entertainment and English education than the square mile. Switzerland is tiny compared to the UK and has played a traditional tax haven role sandwiched between bigger states at the heart of Europe. The Eurozone is a red herring. That we as a country didn't participate made no real difference to the city. London as a cultural and tourist attraction won't be affected in the same way but is hardly likely to be the magnet which attracts hard headed business minds.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 13 Nov 20 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
What a joke. This court claiming claiming 'international law' is little more than a funded treaty that only has power over its signees and can only take action against those that aren't protected by the powerful. The organization has no police force or enforcement body. Oooh I wonder why....is it because 'international law' is in reality just a buzz phrase? Let's see: The US isn't a member. Fine words without power. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2020 12.16pm) It is simply a matter of being honest in your dealings and keeping your word. Obviously if you don't then people will not bother with you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.