This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
PalazioVecchio south pole 24 Oct 18 2.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
I literally did walk through the middle of Whitechapel with a beer in my hand a couple of weeks ago and no one batted an eyelid. thanks for the enlightening commentary on your exploits Dan. Can i suggest you continue with the same and let us all know of your progress.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 24 Oct 18 3.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
I literally did walk through the middle of Whitechapel with a beer in my hand a couple of weeks ago and no one batted an eyelid. Some great pubs in Whitechapel too. I don't agree with aggression but I also don't think people should openly walk around with alcohol. Drink it where you buy it or wait until you get home. There are many parks and green spaces in Lewisham which are blighted by drunks even though there are control orders the police don't move them on.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Oct 18 5.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I don't agree with aggression but I also don't think people should openly walk around with alcohol. Drink it where you buy it or wait until you get home. There are many parks and green spaces in Lewisham which are blighted by drunks even though there are control orders the police don't move them on. That is for the law to deal with not a bunch of religious zealots. And people wonder why Robinson is becoming popular.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 24 Oct 18 7.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
thanks for the enlightening commentary on your exploits Dan. Can i suggest you continue with the same and let us all know of your progress. Dan is the Fotherington-Thomas of the HOL. Older, better read HOLers will understand the reference.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 24 Oct 18 10.06pm | |
---|---|
I'm ambivalent towards him. But he seems to have served more of a purpose than the people who subsequently made a point of his absence at the trials of white sex offenders (one may have been ex EDL). Somehow missing the point that he only exists because of the authorities inaction in Rotherham in the first instance. Obviously if anti-extremism in the form of Quilliam is undermined by alleged racist links I'd rather Robinson were removed from the equation but then to some, standing up against a non-white group would be viewed racist in itself.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 25 Oct 18 4.51pm | |
---|---|
"A new kind of far-right activism" Or could the "right" just be right?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 25 Oct 18 5.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Dan is the Fotherington-Thomas of the HOL. Older, better read HOLers will understand the reference. Cucking, my dear fellow, you do love to 'drop' the most wonderful of 'bricks' & for that sir . . . I salute you.
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 25 Oct 18 6.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
"A new kind of far-right activism" Or could the "right" just be right? That's a very, very good article.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Belmont 25 Oct 18 7.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
You can. The method was questionnaire and it was carried out by Chatham House....link below. The methodology involved 10,000 people from 10 European states and looked to find the attitudes in different European countries to immigration from Islamic countries. The question I referred to was whether people agreed with the statement or not or didn't know to 'all further immigration from mainly Islamic countries should be stopped'. Only 23 percent in the UK disagreed with that statement. So basically the characterisation of my views by some on here as extreme or minority in nature.....in reality shows that these commentators live in their own political bubbles that don't reflect wider society. As for how do I know it's correct. Well, I'm prepared to hear counter evidence....not conjecture, but evidence. Where is it? Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Oct 2018 10.18pm)
So I then looked online to see how accurate surveys of that size could be and as I'm sure you aware there are mathematical equations to ascertain the accuracy, but the overriding answer I got was that they are snapshot not forecast so I am unsure whether a poll of 1000 people (which I assumed from the 10,000 people on 10 country) can be proved to be correct or not unless you truly know the demographic and political makeup of the people polled.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 25 Oct 18 7.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eagleman13
Cucking, my dear fellow, you do love to 'drop' the most wonderful of 'bricks' & for that sir . . . I salute you.
Thank you. I'd given up hope of anyone picking it up. He is, though, isn't he?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 26 Oct 18 12.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Thank you. I'd given up hope of anyone picking it up. He is, though, isn't he?
Am I going to have read another f*cking book just to understand another aspersion on my character? Again. Well read benders.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 Oct 18 1.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Belmont
Hi, in answer to your question as to where is the proof the poll was incorrect, I wrote and email to Chatham House to find out if the poll was factually correct and to date I have had no reply so I rang them today Un fortunately I didn't get very far as the person I spoke to had to look on their website to see if they conducted surveys the only information I gleaned was they don't do them on behalf of government. So I then looked online to see how accurate surveys of that size could be and as I'm sure you aware there are mathematical equations to ascertain the accuracy, but the overriding answer I got was that they are snapshot not forecast so I am unsure whether a poll of 1000 people (which I assumed from the 10,000 people on 10 country) can be proved to be correct or not unless you truly know the demographic and political makeup of the people polled. Well, you have put some research in, which I respect. While I have no reason to believe that this organisation carried out a poor survey (1000 people isn't a particularly small survey) if you find out anything that concerns you please inform me. What I would state, is that the even higher numbers within the other EU countries should make it pretty unlikely that the UK sample is particularly inaccurate....as if it differed significantly we would need to ask why....especially given the higher number of terrorists attacks here. If anything the reality that the UK sample is slightly lower says something to the...in my view, overly comfortable mindset of many in the UK.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.