You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Stadium Redevelopment
November 25 2024 1.52am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Stadium Redevelopment

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 174 of 256 < 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 >

  

silvertop Flag Portishead 02 May 19 1.40pm Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Username

Councils have also suffered huge funding cuts across the country, so it's hardly surprising that when a multi-million pound entity wants to get something done they try and get something out of it for themselves.

Yes but that runs the risk of the matter going to the SoS and penalties if they are found to be seeking to supplement their coffers through the back door.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ARGILE OLD GEEZER Flag PORTIMAO 02 May 19 1.56pm Send a Private Message to ARGILE OLD GEEZER Add ARGILE OLD GEEZER as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by dorking

No plans for additional closed roads on matchdays

There will be a residents CPZ (controlled parking zone) for some distance around the vicinity of the stadium (common at most larger grounds)

Council wanted Palace to include public transport in the cost of a ticket, but it wasn't practical with where everyone comes from

They also wanted Palace to fund station improvements, but these are already planned and funded anyway by the Mayor's office

Palace will be required to have local street clean up teams, and the odd toilet between stations and the ground (presumably those pissoir units)

Why don't we change our name to Westham, the get EVERY thing for NOTHING

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 02 May 19 2.06pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by dorking

No plans for additional closed roads on matchdays

There will be a residents CPZ (controlled parking zone) for some distance around the vicinity of the stadium (common at most larger grounds)

Council wanted Palace to include public transport in the cost of a ticket, but it wasn't practical with where everyone comes from

They also wanted Palace to fund station improvements, but these are already planned and funded anyway by the Mayor's office

Palace will be required to have local street clean up teams, and the odd toilet between stations and the ground (presumably those pissoir units)

Thank you Dorking that was my point. There are things we should be involved with e.g. match day stewarding of the roads if required but it's not up to us to fund the Council's public transport policy.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 02 May 19 2.21pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Badger11

Thank you Dorking that was my point. There are things we should be involved with e.g. match day stewarding of the roads if required but it's not up to us to fund the Council's public transport policy.

For obvious reasons I have no inclination to support Labour controlled Croydon Council, however the Council are probably thinking why should they finance transport upgrades which are required solely as a result of the Selhurst Park development and as such it is incumbent on the club to provide the necessary funds ?

In Crawley, the developers of 'Kilnwood Vale' have had to pay for the work at Cheals Roundabout as it has to be changed to accommodate additional traffic arising from the development.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 02 May 19 2.27pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Willo

For obvious reasons I have no inclination to support Labour controlled Croydon Council, however the Council are probably thinking why should they finance transport upgrades which are required solely as a result of the Selhurst Park development and as such it is incumbent on the club to provide the necessary funds ?

In Crawley, the developers of 'Kilnwood Vale' have had to pay for the work at Cheals Roundabout as it has to be changed to accommodate additional traffic arising from the development.

That's fair enough Willo but there are traffic problems all around Norwood Junction / Croydon even when we are not playing, the devil of course is in the detail.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace in the Blood Flag 02 May 19 3.06pm Send a Private Message to Palace in the Blood Add Palace in the Blood as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

It is quite normal for planning applications to include some form of local amenity reform. However this normally has to be in some way related (at least slightly) to the application. eg Brentford's new ground, refurbishment of station nearby and disabled access improvements are taking place and i would be fairly sure that Brentford are providing some (or all) of cost. The problem for Selhurst Park there are few obvious things. Public transport is a problem we know and accept that, having 3 stations is far from ideal. Local road improvements will be included in plans but will be limited by current layouts/ houses. Since we all hope this is the first phase of an expansion of the ground, the local authority will also be considering how other phases could be managed and how this can be used to improve local facilities/amenities

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 02 May 19 3.33pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Palace in the Blood

It is quite normal for planning applications to include some form of local amenity reform. However this normally has to be in some way related (at least slightly) to the application. eg Brentford's new ground, refurbishment of station nearby and disabled access improvements are taking place and i would be fairly sure that Brentford are providing some (or all) of cost. The problem for Selhurst Park there are few obvious things. Public transport is a problem we know and accept that, having 3 stations is far from ideal. Local road improvements will be included in plans but will be limited by current layouts/ houses. Since we all hope this is the first phase of an expansion of the ground, the local authority will also be considering how other phases could be managed and how this can be used to improve local facilities/amenities

How many more than 3 train stations would be ideal?

How many do some other clubs have nearby, even in their original built up areas? One? None?

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goal Machine Flag The Cronx 02 May 19 3.50pm Send a Private Message to Goal Machine Add Goal Machine as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

How many more than 3 train stations would be ideal?

How many do some other clubs have nearby, even in their original built up areas? One? None?

Got to agree with this. There's often chat that Selhurst Park is difficult to get to, but quite frankly its nonsense. NJ is extremely well served from London Bridge and the south (including 3 mins from East Croydon) and Selhurst is well served from Victoria. In fact, I can't think of many grounds that are easier to get to by public transport.

Take the brand new white Hart Lane, one small overground station nearby (White Hart Lane), otherwise its a 30 min walk to Seven Sisters or Tottenham Hale

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 02 May 19 3.59pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Goal Machine

Got to agree with this. There's often chat that Selhurst Park is difficult to get to, but quite frankly its nonsense. NJ is extremely well served from London Bridge and the south (including 3 mins from East Croydon) and Selhurst is well served from Victoria. In fact, I can't think of many grounds that are easier to get to by public transport.

Take the brand new white Hart Lane, one small overground station nearby (White Hart Lane), otherwise its a 30 min walk to Seven Sisters or Tottenham Hale

I agree. It’s just northerners who moan because they have to do an extra train journey on top of train and tube. Or if driving they have to come round to the bottom of the M25 and then halfway towards central London as opposed to the other clubs where they almost drive into London after being on the M25 for 5-15 minutes. Otherwise we’re no different.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 02 May 19 4.04pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Willo

For obvious reasons I have no inclination to support Labour controlled Croydon Council, however the Council are probably thinking why should they finance transport upgrades which are required solely as a result of the Selhurst Park development and as such it is incumbent on the club to provide the necessary funds ?

In Crawley, the developers of 'Kilnwood Vale' have had to pay for the work at Cheals Roundabout as it has to be changed to accommodate additional traffic arising from the development.

They will be the ones who only paid £1million for the land, which was worth considerably more. Also, post-permission cut the number of affordable housing that were available!!
Live very close to this development, Council put in a set of traffic lights right by the development, claiming it was to assist horse riders (I have lived here 28 years and have never seen a horse on that stretch of road) it is obviously to assist the extra traffic generated by the large development, an underhand agreement no doubt at time of planning.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
croydon proud Flag Any european country i fancy! 02 May 19 6.07pm

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Spiderman

They will be the ones who only paid £1million for the land, which was worth considerably more. Also, post-permission cut the number of affordable housing that were available!!
Live very close to this development, Council put in a set of traffic lights right by the development, claiming it was to assist horse riders (I have lived here 28 years and have never seen a horse on that stretch of road) it is obviously to assist the extra traffic generated by the large development, an underhand agreement no doubt at time of planning.

\Underhand spider? not from the CONS surely?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
dreamwaverider Flag London 02 May 19 6.15pm Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Councils seem to be delaying everything almost like they are punishing development because Central Government have slashed their budgets.
What Central Government needs to do is farm out local council roles and responsibilities and give them even less money. They all continue to employ thousands of people in totally non sensible roles squandering public funds.
Scrap the lot of them I say, streamline the planning system and get so much more done in a far more positive way far quicker for far less money.
But it aint gonna happen.
They are all in a far worse state than anyone wants to acknowledge.

Edited by dreamwaverider (02 May 2019 6.15pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 174 of 256 < 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Stadium Redevelopment