US politics

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

US politics

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 173 of 706 < 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 >

croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 23 Nov 21 1.30am
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle There you go. Boris understands how publicity works. Why or how that makes him popular is another question. I doubt sir Keir was even there to be fair, but who knows.
Alert a moderator to this post

croydon proud

Any european country i fancy! 23 Nov 21 1.30am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

There you go. Boris understands how publicity works. Why or how that makes him popular is another question.

I doubt sir Keir was even there to be fair, but who knows.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 23 Nov 21 8.30am
Originally posted by croydon proud I doubt sir Keir was even there to be fair, but who knows. He was. [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

23 Nov 21 8.30am

Originally posted by croydon proud

I doubt sir Keir was even there to be fair, but who knows.

He was.

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 23 Nov 21 8.45am
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Or they might be as dishonest as you. You need a new dictionary! There is nothing dishonest in stating either what you know at the time, as the law enforcement officer did, or reporting his words, as I did. Now the situation has clarified, and the suspect has been charged with homicide, although it has been said there aren't any terrorist implications. Why, after fleeing another crowd scene, he seems to have decided to deliberately drive into a crowd of people remains unknown, but obviously him being high on drugs looks likely. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 23 Nov 21 8.45am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Or they might be as dishonest as you.

You need a new dictionary!

There is nothing dishonest in stating either what you know at the time, as the law enforcement officer did, or reporting his words, as I did.

Now the situation has clarified, and the suspect has been charged with homicide, although it has been said there aren't any terrorist implications. Why, after fleeing another crowd scene, he seems to have decided to deliberately drive into a crowd of people remains unknown, but obviously him being high on drugs looks likely.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 21 12.11pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle You need a new dictionary! There is nothing dishonest in stating either what you know at the time, as the law enforcement officer did, or reporting his words, as I did. Now the situation has clarified, and the suspect has been charged with homicide, although it has been said there aren't any terrorist implications. Why, after fleeing another crowd scene, he seems to have decided to deliberately drive into a crowd of people remains unknown, but obviously him being high on drugs looks likely. You are dishonest, plain and simple. You know full well that it is likely related directly or indirectly to Rittenhouse and that a Black criminal is responsible, hence your desire to deflect and muddle the issue. It's the same old crap from you over and over. No doubt, when this is all made clear, you will have some excuse for the driver. Perhaps a White person looked at him funny that morning.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

23 Nov 21 12.11pm

Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You need a new dictionary!

There is nothing dishonest in stating either what you know at the time, as the law enforcement officer did, or reporting his words, as I did.

You are dishonest, plain and simple. You know full well that it is likely related directly or indirectly to Rittenhouse and that a Black criminal is responsible, hence your desire to deflect and muddle the issue.

It's the same old crap from you over and over.

No doubt, when this is all made clear, you will have some excuse for the driver.
Perhaps a White person looked at him funny that morning.

Alert a moderator to this post

DanH SW2 23 Nov 21 12.28pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger You are dishonest, plain and simple. You know full well that it is likely related directly or indirectly to Rittenhouse and that a Black criminal is responsible, hence your desire to deflect and muddle the issue. It's the same old crap from you over and over. No doubt, when this is all made clear, you will have some excuse for the driver. Perhaps a White person looked at him funny that morning. This is bonkers, even for you. You've created your own narrative despite there being no evidence for it and are trying to say Wisbech is dishonest? Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 12.44pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

DanH

SW2 23 Nov 21 12.28pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

It's the same old crap from you over and over.

No doubt, when this is all made clear, you will have some excuse for the driver.
Perhaps a White person looked at him funny that morning.

This is bonkers, even for you. You've created your own narrative despite there being no evidence for it and are trying to say Wisbech is dishonest?

Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 12.44pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 21 12.46pm
Originally posted by DanH This is bonkers, even for you. You've created your own narrative despite there being no evidence for it and are trying to say Wisbech is dishonest? Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 12.44pm) Here comes the other Chuckle brother, right on cue.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

23 Nov 21 12.46pm

Originally posted by DanH

This is bonkers, even for you. You've created your own narrative despite there being no evidence for it and are trying to say Wisbech is dishonest?

Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 12.44pm)

Here comes the other Chuckle brother, right on cue.

Alert a moderator to this post

DanH SW2 23 Nov 21 12.52pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger Here comes the other Chuckle brother, right on cue. Unbelievable how you post some of the utter tripe you do and still think you're the sensible, moderate one in these discussions.
Alert a moderator to this post

DanH

SW2 23 Nov 21 12.52pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Here comes the other Chuckle brother, right on cue.

Unbelievable how you post some of the utter tripe you do and *still* think you're the sensible, moderate one in these discussions.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 21 1.05pm
Originally posted by DanH Unbelievable how you post some of the utter tripe you do and still think you're the sensible, moderate one in these discussions. This is very brave of you after last week when you tried to claim that an Islamist terrorist was a Christian and made a total fool of yourself. One should be very wary of believing things on face value or accepting the official line. Let's just wait and see how this turns out.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

23 Nov 21 1.05pm

Originally posted by DanH

Unbelievable how you post some of the utter tripe you do and *still* think you're the sensible, moderate one in these discussions.

This is very brave of you after last week when you tried to claim that an Islamist terrorist was a Christian and made a total fool of yourself.

One should be very wary of believing things on face value or accepting the official line.

Let's just wait and see how this turns out.

Alert a moderator to this post

DanH SW2 23 Nov 21 1.28pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger This is very brave of you after last week when you tried to claim that an Islamist terrorist was a Christian and made a total fool of yourself. One should be very wary of believing things on face value or accepting the official line. Let's just wait and see how this turns out. He had converted to Christianity. That was a fact. What his motivations behind doing so are questionable but he has spent time with Christian groups. It’s almost like you need nuance with these situations and not wade in with a raging hard on that something fits in with your neat little world view despite not knowing the facts.
Alert a moderator to this post

DanH

SW2 23 Nov 21 1.28pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

This is very brave of you after last week when you tried to claim that an Islamist terrorist was a Christian and made a total fool of yourself.

One should be very wary of believing things on face value or accepting the official line.

Let's just wait and see how this turns out.

He had converted to Christianity. That was a fact. What his motivations behind doing so are questionable but he has spent time with Christian groups.

It’s almost like you need nuance with these situations and not wade in with a raging hard on that something fits in with your neat little world view despite not knowing the facts.

Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 21 1.32pm
Originally posted by DanH He had converted to Christianity. That was a fact. What his motivations behind doing so are questionable but he has spent time with Christian groups. It’s almost like you need nuance with these situations and not wade in with a raging hard on that something fits in with your neat little world view despite not knowing the facts. No s*** Sherlock. You are too funny.
Alert a moderator to this post

Hrolf The Ganger

23 Nov 21 1.32pm

Originally posted by DanH

He had converted to Christianity. That was a fact. What his motivations behind doing so are questionable but he has spent time with Christian groups.

It’s almost like you need nuance with these situations and not wade in with a raging hard on that something fits in with your neat little world view despite not knowing the facts.

No s*** Sherlock.

You are too funny.

Alert a moderator to this post

DanH SW2 23 Nov 21 1.34pm
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger No s*** Sherlock. You are too funny. You are a bizarre and tedious little man. Go and have a walk, it’s a nice day outside. Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 1.34pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

DanH

SW2 23 Nov 21 1.34pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

No s*** Sherlock.

You are too funny.

You are a bizarre and tedious little man. Go and have a walk, it’s a nice day outside.

Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 1.34pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 23 Nov 21 1.36pm
Originally posted by DanH This is bonkers, even for you. You've created your own narrative despite there being no evidence for it and are trying to say Wisbech is dishonest? Edited by DanH (23 Nov 2021 12.44pm) Wisbech is dishonest. That's independent of this attack. What he said on that was just a bit dim.....and I don't regard him as dim. Perhaps we can put it down to his desire to accept anything from the media that fits with his own preferred prejudices. Again, that's something we are all susceptible to. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

23 Nov 21 1.36pm