You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Palace v Everton match thread
November 21 2024 9.35pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Palace v Everton match thread

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 17 of 19 < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

  

Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 13 Nov 23 9.26am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

I note with interest that of the home games against teams currently below us, Fulham, Forest, and Everton, we didn't win a single one. Two lame 0-0 draws and a defeat. Two point out of a possible nine. That's form that will see you slide done the table, as we appear to be doing.
It's not all Roy's doing of course. Despite his overall defensive viewpoint of the game, he's been hard hit bit injuries to key players, and all the replacements are sub-standard. No doubt Parish thought he could squeeze another season out of players like Ward, given Roy's game plan and experience. Parish was mistaken. One Eze doesn't make up for two mediocre full backs. One Olise doesn't make up for a paper thin squad, that one has only to scratch the surface to see there's nothing there.
Games coming up in December and early January against the top sides, and I don't envisage us getting much out of them. currently 13th, and 15th/16th a real possibility. Managers have been sacked for less.
The blame ultimately falls on Parish. Money spent on players who are not essential to the current well being of the team: a keeper whose first meaningful action is to injure himself making a standard clearance, a young Brazilian 5700 mile from home, family, and friends, a centre back who Arsenal were only too happy to get a minimal fee for - the list goes on - Hughes, a bit part player even at Watford, and yet we expect him to fill a key midfield position. Mateta - can we get a refund?
It's ludicrous.

I'm inclined to agree at this point in time where I am concerned.

It feels as though they have somewhat tried to follow the old model in reliance upon Wilf but this time with Eze/Olise taking up that mantle. What we're left with is a couple decent players providing all our threat and a lot of 'filling' elsewhere in the squad.

The Franca one seems like a wild gamble with no real thought process behind it and Henderson purely a financial thing where they thought we were getting a player below his market worth for ROI (Ferguson may also come into this bracket, where their quality may be worth more than their fee, but their ability to stay/get fit renders the whole thing a complete waste of money).

I would suggest trying to pull together a top half PL squad on a minimal budget is an endeavour with very limited chance of success. You'll either look like a genius or, more than likely, face criticism for a lot of your choices. It sometimes looks as though we've tried to pick up a load of bargains but many of these begin to show why such players were available at lower prices in the first place.

You hope Roy can keep the ship afloat for the time being but we all knew, consciously or subconsciously, the reason why he was brought back to begin with. It was never to 'see out the season' whilst they re-strategised, it was always reflective of trying to do as much with as little resource as possible. It's a very small pool of managers willing/able to do that.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Elpis Flag In a pub 13 Nov 23 9.29am Send a Private Message to Elpis Add Elpis as a friend

Originally posted by grumpymort

ANother poster spreading nonsense & has no clue

I agree with sprites.

Hughes was the only one helping Mitchell at times and you cant expect him to cover every area (Schlupp should be the one doing more others have to pick up his slack)

You do not play as many games he has for England u21 if you are Championship quality.

You have missed one of the big factors Roy does not use a lot of peoples strengths and plays people out of positions.


I think when we have all our players available we will see who is talking nonsense .Hughes will be back on the bench and will still be behind Schulpp in the pecking order . Why? Because Schulpp can be trusted to do what he is told to do by the coaches . Both Roy and PV have chosen to trust Schulpp ahead of Hughes for that reason.
Maybe they don't have a clue either ?

Playing for England u21 is no barometer to your future level in the game . All its saying is you have performed well in that age bracket . Indeed you only have to look at the U21 squad Hughes was in (2015 euros) and you will find players now playing in the USA and Australia ,Salford city , Stevenage ,Norwich , Sunderland and Exeter city ,Championship at best .

I haven't missed anything with regard Roy's team selection . He uses what he has got in the best way he can . We may have a difference of opinion in certain positions but we all basically pick the same players in the 'team for next week thread' .We really don't have a lot of options .

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
southnorwoodhill Flag 13 Nov 23 9.31am Send a Private Message to southnorwoodhill Add southnorwoodhill as a friend

Originally posted by Nicholas91

I'm inclined to agree at this point in time where I am concerned.

It feels as though they have somewhat tried to follow the old model in reliance upon Wilf but this time with Eze/Olise taking up that mantle. What we're left with is a couple decent players providing all our threat and a lot of 'filling' elsewhere in the squad.

The Franca one seems like a wild gamble with no real thought process behind it and Henderson purely a financial thing where they thought we were getting a player below his market worth for ROI (Ferguson may also come into this bracket, where their quality may be worth more than their fee, but their ability to stay/get fit renders the whole thing a complete waste of money).

I would suggest trying to pull together a top half PL squad on a minimal budget is an endeavour with very limited chance of success. You'll either look like a genius or, more than likely, face criticism for a lot of your choices. It sometimes looks as though we've tried to pick up a load of bargains but many of these begin to show why such players were available at lower prices in the first place.

You hope Roy can keep the ship afloat for the time being but we all knew, consciously or subconsciously, the reason why he was brought back to begin with. It was never to 'see out the season' whilst they re-strategised, it was always reflective of trying to do as much with as little resource as possible. It's a very small pool of managers willing/able to do that.

Well made points and I totally agree.
We have around six players who form the core group of the side, each one good enough to progress to a side higher up the table, everyone else is either bit part or not good enough. As Dubai Eagle commented in reply to a post of mine, we have spent just to stand still. Astute, and very true.

Edited by southnorwoodhill (13 Nov 2023 9.52am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ripleyeagle Flag Ripley Surrey 13 Nov 23 9.35am Send a Private Message to ripleyeagle Add ripleyeagle as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Quite simply, no, you are wrong. Hughes is too slow to play in that important spot next to Lerma. He also does not read the game as well as Doucoure. I can virtually guarantee we would not have conceded that third goal if Doucoure was on the pitch.

It’s also ridiculous to say he helped out Mitchell. Of course he did, he’s the left sided of the holding two, he’s supposed to do that. Yes, Schlupp should be tracking back but if a wide man cuts inside early then it is Hughes job to intercept and he cost us the last goal by failing to track back.

The pundits know their stuff, he got an outfield dead last 5.9 rating and the next lowest was Mitchell with a 6.3
I agree Hughes is too slow, I disagree in that he can read the game but by the time he gets to the challenge he’s either too late or commits the foul out of frustration.
He is very much a poor man’s Jimmy Mc and yet another of our make do players. My opinion but if you are going to call people’s opinions nonsense then I’m going to call you out on it and explain why they are not.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lanzo-Ad Flag Lanzarote 13 Nov 23 10.01am Send a Private Message to Lanzo-Ad Add Lanzo-Ad as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Quite simply, no, you are wrong. Hughes is too slow to play in that important spot next to Lerma. He also does not read the game as well as Doucoure. I can virtually guarantee we would not have conceded that third goal if Doucoure was on the pitch.

It’s also ridiculous to say he helped out Mitchell. Of course he did, he’s the left sided of the holding two, he’s supposed to do that. Yes, Schlupp should be tracking back but if a wide man cuts inside early then it is Hughes job to intercept and he cost us the last goal by failing to track back.

The pundits know their stuff, he got an outfield dead last 5.9 rating and the next lowest was Mitchell with a 6.3

He is very much a poor man’s Jimmy Mc and yet another of our make do players. My opinion but if you are going to call people’s opinions nonsense then I’m going to call you out on it and explain why they are not.

100% correct, one of the 3 key players.

 


“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
viveasheagle Flag perth 13 Nov 23 10.02am Send a Private Message to viveasheagle Add viveasheagle as a friend

I think with Hughes he knows he is an experienced squad player and i remember in an interview at Palace he was very humble about been in a squad with so many talented players. He clearly knows what he is about and for me he has covered admirably while Olise and Eze have been out. I am sure he will get games over the hectic xmas period as well. Roy explained in his post match interview why he did not pick Doucoure due to him only having only trained on the friday due to knock.
He has his limitations like his lack of speed but you need his type of player on the budget we work within.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Gribbo Flag Bromley 13 Nov 23 10.06am Send a Private Message to Gribbo Add Gribbo as a friend

Don't forget, for Roy a 0-0 score line is a good result at home, regardless of who we are playing - keeps you out of the bottom 3, which is Roy and Palace's sole objective. It will be the reason why our good young players eventually move on.

If you think we have no option to replace a mistake-prone Joel Ward, we have Clyne, Richards, Holding, Danny Imray, and anyone else we could have bought in the last 6 transfer windows since AWB took his place in the side. Richards may not be a right back, but he is quicker than Ward and would make fewer errors. Let's not forget that Joel adds absolutely nothing going forward - cannot beat a player, cannot cross a ball. Great club servant, but time to move on.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
palace99 Flag New Mills 13 Nov 23 10.32am

Originally posted by grumpymort

ANother poster spreading nonsense & has no clue

I agree with sprites.

Hughes was the only one helping Mitchell at times and you cant expect him to cover every area (Schlupp should be the one doing more others have to pick up his slack)

You do not play as many games he has for England u21 if you are Championship quality.

You have missed one of the big factors Roy does not use a lot of peoples strengths and plays people out of positions.

I don't dislike Hughes, but he is so slow and his overall game is average at best. Playing the advanced midfield position when we had a few injuries highlighted his limitations.

There is a reason why Watford weren't prepared to give him a big payrise when he was in the last year of his contract and also why Palace only gave him a 3 year contract (so he can leave on a free next summer). He is now in his 3rd year with us, has never been a regular and although he made a decent number of appearances last season, many were as sub.

On Sat he was slow to react for the first goal (albeit a number of others were at fault too) and the 3rd goal was shocking - the guy who walked passed him to score was an ageing defensive midfielder.

Yes, Schlupp has been a disaster and seems to go missing on the left, in both attacking and defensive situations, but let's be honest Hughes is just not good enough.

Yes he played for England U21 regularly, however, so did Bruce Dyer, so i think that says it all.

Edited by palace99 (13 Nov 2023 10.32am)

Edited by palace99 (13 Nov 2023 10.33am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 13 Nov 23 10.55am Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

I note with interest that of the home games against teams currently below us, Fulham, Forest, and Everton, we didn't win a single one. Two lame 0-0 draws and a defeat. Two point out of a possible nine. That's form that will see you slide done the table, as we appear to be doing.
It's not all Roy's doing of course. Despite his overall defensive viewpoint of the game, he's been hard hit bit injuries to key players, and all the replacements are sub-standard. No doubt Parish thought he could squeeze another season out of players like Ward, given Roy's game plan and experience. Parish was mistaken. One Eze doesn't make up for two mediocre full backs. One Olise doesn't make up for a paper thin squad, that one has only to scratch the surface to see there's nothing there.
Games coming up in December and early January against the top sides, and I don't envisage us getting much out of them. currently 13th, and 15th/16th a real possibility. Managers have been sacked for less.
The blame ultimately falls on Parish. Money spent on players who are not essential to the current well being of the team: a keeper whose first meaningful action is to injure himself making a standard clearance, a young Brazilian 5700 mile from home, family, and friends, a centre back who Arsenal were only too happy to get a minimal fee for - the list goes on - Hughes, a bit part player even at Watford, and yet we expect him to fill a key midfield position. Mateta - can we get a refund?
It's ludicrous.

Can't disagree with much of this.

When Roy was appointed for this season, to me it signalled that the club were not spending much in the transfer market. So I was surprised that the best part of £40m was spent. Unfortunately at least half on a goalkeeper which seems over the top to me. Can't blame him or the club for his unfortunate injury though. Franca is a huge gamble given the fee and the fact that we needed ( imo ) Premier League ready players rather than unproven teenagers to bolster the squad.

As for Saturday's game, if you concede 3 goals at home to Everton then you probably deserve nothing. A fully fit Doucoure was much missed in the midfield. I thought we were too easy to play against in that area. I like Hughes's feistyness but he's too one paced and I thought he had a bit of a stinker on Saturday, gave the ball away too often. Edouard continues to frustrate. His work rate, or rather lack of, combined with his powder puff approach to the physical side of the game, gives the impression that we are playing with a man short at times.

I'm not sure what more Roy can do given the resources available. He's there as part of a holding pattern by the looks of it, but without actually knowing what Parish's strategy is, it's all speculation.

For once I'm glad there's an international break ahead !

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 13 Nov 23 11.06am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

Well made points and I totally agree.
We have around six players who form the core group of the side, each one good enough to progress to a side higher up the table, everyone else is either bit part or not good enough. As Dubai Eagle commented in reply to a post of mine, we have spent just to stand still. Astute, and very true.

Edited by southnorwoodhill (13 Nov 2023 9.52am)

It's a situation which can be looked up on in different ways, very much glass half empty/full.

The lack of excitement is obviously the 'half empty' when we're not reaching latter stages of cups or the top half of the table (or just losing to a Sean Dyche Everton at home) but the 'half full' whilst we remain a PL outfit.

What it does provide however is plenty of fuel for a moan at the troughs! I'll just continue hoping for a new manager who proves revolutionary, new wing backs, a new winger and new striker. I'd rather not get too involved in ignorantly speculating or suggesting how that might/will come about but I'll put in on a list and send to St. Nick for now

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
OAPeagle Flag 13 Nov 23 11.38am Send a Private Message to OAPeagle Add OAPeagle as a friend

I agree all the comments re Ward and Mitchell. For me it did seem like someone had put superglue on the soles of a number of players boots, but the main problem is of course finishing up front. On paper, when we bought him, Edouard looked a good bet and tbf he is a good finisher (OK, only when he's had plenty of advance warning and space). Unlike soccer computer games, players aren't programmed robots. Moves to other teams can transform or ruin reputations. In reality the most successful strikers must have a sixth sense, to start running on to a through ball - or to anticipate a cross - before the playmaker has indicated their intention - and the playmaker themselves know before they play the pass where the striker will be. This only comes with practice and an innate understanding and respect between key players. The body language says everything. My hope is that Franca will be more in tune with Eze and Olise's mindset which means - for better or worse - give him much more game time (ie s*** or bust as my old coach used to say). If it works we could be in for one of the most exciting attacking lines since Wrighty and Brighty. Then, with more goals and points this might (please god) be the trigger and incentive for SP to spend a few bob and fill in the missing gaps necessary to make us top quartile team.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hilaire Flag Send, Nr Guildford 13 Nov 23 11.55am Send a Private Message to Hilaire Add Hilaire as a friend

Originally posted by OAPeagle

I agree all the comments re Ward and Mitchell. For me it did seem like someone had put superglue on the soles of a number of players boots, but the main problem is of course finishing up front. On paper, when we bought him, Edouard looked a good bet and tbf he is a good finisher (OK, only when he's had plenty of advance warning and space). Unlike soccer computer games, players aren't programmed robots. Moves to other teams can transform or ruin reputations. In reality the most successful strikers must have a sixth sense, to start running on to a through ball - or to anticipate a cross - before the playmaker has indicated their intention - and the playmaker themselves know before they play the pass where the striker will be. This only comes with practice and an innate understanding and respect between key players. The body language says everything. My hope is that Franca will be more in tune with Eze and Olise's mindset which means - for better or worse - give him much more game time (ie s*** or bust as my old coach used to say). If it works we could be in for one of the most exciting attacking lines since Wrighty and Brighty. Then, with more goals and points this might (please god) be the trigger and incentive for SP to spend a few bob and fill in the missing gaps necessary to make us top quartile team.

We will spend next to nothing until the new stand is completed - the quicker everyone realises that the better we can move on and make do with what we have. Until then, keep your fingers crossed!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 17 of 19 < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Palace v Everton match thread