This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Goalpost1 Worcester Park 14 Aug 23 1.35pm | |
---|---|
I would honestly think twice if I were Olise. Surely he has to question just how much game time will he actually get at Chelsea when he returns to fitness. I think he'd get more of a look in at City, which is a better organised winning machine compared to Chelsea.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 14 Aug 23 1.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Goalpost1
I would honestly think twice if I were Olise. Surely he has to question just how much game time will he actually get at Chelsea when he returns to fitness. I think he'd get more of a look in at City, which is a better organised winning machine compared to Chelsea. Agree.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 14 Aug 23 2.15pm | |
---|---|
If I were Olise I would be looking at wilf and how he wanted to move for years and couldnt until his contract expired and only had turkey to go to. I would be getting my move in while I am hot property and a decent bid in. Lack of playing time didint stop conor gallagher wanting play for chelsea. And if it doesnt work out chelsea will let him go alot easier and a reduced fee after a year or two.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
doombear Too far from Selhurst Park 14 Aug 23 2.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Agree.
Having said that young players coming to us on long contracts believe that we will be letting them go at a future time, However, both the price has to be right AND (and this is important) the timing has to be right from the club's perspective. It seems there is something unusual about the Olise contract which would seem to put him in the driving seat judging by what Roy has said. However, if we have the ability to say no to a deal and we want to keep Olise for another year then we should unless we have a replacement lined up. We don't as JRS needs a year in the Championship before we can determine whether he will be ready for the first team next seaqson.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EddieMac 14 Aug 23 3.00pm | |
---|---|
It is clear to see now that he has no buy out clause.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 14 Aug 23 3.08pm | |
---|---|
If Olise has no buyout clause why has Roy said in two interviews that I have watched that it is Olise's 'choice' as to whether he stays?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eagleman13 On The Road To Hell & Alicante 14 Aug 23 3.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Agree. Wrong. Olise to Chelsea = Treatment Room(you do realise he's injured?)
This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EddieMac 14 Aug 23 3.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
If Olise has no buyout clause why has Roy said in two interviews that I have watched that it is Olise's 'choice' as to whether he stays? Because it is his choice. If Chelsea offer enough money and he wants to go, He will go. Fact not fiction.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PatrickA London 14 Aug 23 3.57pm | |
---|---|
If it was as straightforward as that Wilf would have gone a long time ago. It is a fact that Olise had a clause in his Reading contract which enabled Palace to buy him in the first place. Originally posted by EddieMac
Because it is his choice. If Chelsea offer enough money and he wants to go, He will go. Fact not fiction.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eritheagle Erith 14 Aug 23 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
would love Madueke, would be a fantastic direct replacement. Makes you wonder why they need Olise. Madueke plays on the left whilst Olise plays on the right. Rumour is that Poch wants to play Olise in no.10 role which if true begs the question why they want Lavia when got Fernandez and Caicedo. Although Olise is very good I've not really taken to him as I have with Eze (although I did want us to sign him for 18 months before we got him) and I also think he's quite fragile esp as still quite young and already having fair share of injuries.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Putitout Oxford 14 Aug 23 4.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
If it was as straightforward as that Wilf would have gone a long time ago. It is a fact that Olise had a clause in his Reading contract which enabled Palace to buy him in the first place. I think it’s somewhere in between. It’s true he is Palaces player under contract until Palace say otherwise. There is always a big BUT, it rarely works out for club or player once the player makes it clear they want away, and that applies not just for Palace but everywhere. Roy knows if Olise, wants the move the likely hood is he goes. The trouble really starts if another club make a substantial offer, everything else just winds the player up, and that’s as much as is happening up to now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EddieMac 14 Aug 23 4.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
If it was as straightforward as that Wilf would have gone a long time ago. It is a fact that Olise had a clause in his Reading contract which enabled Palace to buy him in the first place. The only club that we know for certain that was close to signing Wilf was Arsenal but they bought Pepe instead.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.