This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay UK 02 Feb 22 3.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Whether Judaism constitutes a race or not she seemed to be saying that the deaths if 6,000,000 people would have been worse had the holocaust been racially motivated. The result of polarisation of both the left and right. The result is little more than clouded and corrupted thinking on both counts. An intentionally media driven, roided up, over politicisation of the masses leading to echo chambers ideologies and people at loggerheads when they dare step outside of them. I very much doubt those counting their riches have such ardent social views, they just sprinkle these seeds others gardens while they get back to business; their decision making metric.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 02 Feb 22 3.59pm | |
---|---|
I wonder how many people know about the Holodomor genocide that Stalin carried out. No one's ever really bothered when people talk about it. There is a massive difference in knowledge and teaching and in how much children are taught it.....in fact I bet most people don't even know it happened. Strange....not. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2022 4.50pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 02 Feb 22 4.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Oh the JQ....fraught with danger. If you don't adhere to strict interpretations the weight of the mainstream will come squarely down on your backside.....As Goldberg is finding out....though her millionaire victimhood 'protected characteristics' will spare her the job. Of course the holocaust was race based, in the thirties the Nazis passed laws that were entirely based upon race that allowed it to be set up. Goldberg probably doesn't know that. She should have the right to air her views and for it to be debated....but I note that the time she lives in isn't interested. No one's allowed to speak who differs in any interpretation that offends those in power. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2022 3.54pm) Agree. The very fact she used Goldberg as a stage name to sound Jewish to get acting like work is a little suspicious. I don’t wish her any ill. She’s just as stupid as I knew she was last week.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 02 Feb 22 4.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
A very good point. It seems as though there is real ambiguity around the definitions or understanding of race, culture, heritage and experience for some people. Nicely articulated BJ (noting hilarious acronym there) with regards to results/consequences of an insistence on categorisation being of far more importance. A bit off topic, and just a thought not an academic proposal, but it occurs to me that those so desperately seeking to categorise themselves often do so with an intentional, or perhaps unintentional consequence of categorising and consequentially persecuting others. Absolutely. And such definitions are often so ham fisted across the board - and hinge on a past we are realistically largely disconnected from,compared to our present. Beyond a point, it's a mistake to get too pulled into it all, and instead we should invest more of our efforts and ideas in our local communities, whatever its composition may be and taking as we find as we go. The internet doesn't help in my view. It has warped the thinking of many, because 'off the shelf' ideologies are so very easy to opt into, often set peoples own shortcomings or frailties (of course to the writers or video makers financial benefit), and in a transparently full-on way. Half comfort blanket, half crack pipe. People can't get enough of whatever props up their biases - and too much of that changes them for the worse. Most political whatsapp or facebook messages I get nowadays, whether 'left' or 'right', are so transparent in their angle and intention that the sender may as well just grab me by the neck and tell me that I have to believe this or that. In this madcap age, I have more and more respect for those in my life who realistically give very little away politically, and instead just tend to get on with things, which isn't always easy for any of us, regardless of what box people may be inclined to put us in, and us them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Feb 22 4.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Absolutely. And such definitions are often so ham fisted across the board - and hinge on a past we are realistically largely disconnected from,compared to our present. Beyond a point, it's a mistake to get too pulled into it all, and instead we should invest more of our efforts and ideas in our local communities, whatever its composition may be and taking as we find as we go. The internet doesn't help in my view. It has warped the thinking of many, because 'off the shelf' ideologies are so very easy to opt into, often set peoples own shortcomings or frailties (of course to the writers or video makers financial benefit), and in a transparently full-on way. Half comfort blanket, half crack pipe. People can't get enough of whatever props up their biases - and too much of that changes them for the worse. Most political whatsapp or facebook messages I get nowadays, whether 'left' or 'right', are so transparent in their angle and intention that the sender may as well just grab me by the neck and tell me that I have to believe this or that. In this madcap age, I have more and more respect for those in my life who realistically give very little away politically, and instead just tend to get on with things, which isn't always easy for any of us, regardless of what box people may be inclined to put us in, and us them.
Again, all good points. The universities of YouTube, social media, Wikipedia etc have bred their own race of the ill-informed and easily influenced.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Feb 22 4.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I wonder how many people know about the Holodomor genocide that Stalin carried out. No one's ever really bothered when people talk about it. There is a massive difference in knowledge and teaching and in how much children are taught it.....in fact I bet most people don't even know it happened. Strange....not. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2022 4.50pm) I would suspect that a reasonable proportion of people may not be directly knowledgeable on the subject but may be more broadly aware of a simplified understanding of the fact Stalin led an incredible and brutal purge within the Soviet Union. Credit to you though Stirling, a true Stakhanovite in sense of contribution to the news/politics section if there ever were one! Just for clarification and to remove any doubt, I studied Stalin in school and have retained some knowledge incredibly and yes, I'll jump on any opportunity to present as even reasonably educated, even if not in this instance I would also throw in there that perhaps history is taught on basis of relevance to a populace? I would consider myself far more versed on European affairs than most septics however probably have a far less knowledgeable understanding of American history than most of them. Just a thought... but I do acknowledge
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 02 Feb 22 5.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
I would suspect that a reasonable proportion of people may not be directly knowledgeable on the subject but may be more broadly aware of a simplified understanding of the fact Stalin led an incredible and brutal purge within the Soviet Union. Credit to you though Stirling, a true Stakhanovite in sense of contribution to the news/politics section if there ever were one! Just for clarification and to remove any doubt, I studied Stalin in school and have retained some knowledge incredibly and yes, I'll jump on any opportunity to present as even reasonably educated, even if not in this instance I would also throw in there that perhaps history is taught on basis of relevance to a populace? I would consider myself far more versed on European affairs than most septics however probably have a far less knowledgeable understanding of American history than most of them. Just a thought... but I do acknowledge I think that has some relevance but then again I view Russians and Ukrainians as Europeans as well....they just operated more to the east and under a different power structure.....though obviously the Ukraine has been in a power struggle since the nineties. But thanks for your post, we both share an appreciation for Russian history, which is fascinating if frequently a tragedy. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2022 5.25pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 02 Feb 22 5.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Agree. The very fact she used Goldberg as a stage name to sound Jewish to get acting like work is a little suspicious. I don’t wish her any ill. She’s just as stupid as I knew she was last week. I remember her at the start, she had comic talent, if not dramatically talented. She was far more libertarian before the woke era....she would do interview shows with people she didn't agree with and actually listen...Now she's a fully signed up member of the progressives and buys into their powerplays and seemingly means it. The contrast to the earlier version of her is quite stark.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 02 Feb 22 5.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I remember her at the start, she had comic talent, if not dramatically talented. She was far more libertarian before the woke era....she would do interview shows with people she didn't agree with and actually listen...Now she's a fully signed up member of the progressives and buys into their powerplays and seemingly means it. The contrast to the earlier version of her is quite stark. I think if they played early Goldberg on TV the woke would have a heart attack.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 02 Feb 22 5.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think that has some relevance but then again I view Russians and Ukrainians as Europeans as well....they just operated more to the east and under a different power structure.....though obviously the Ukraine has been in a power struggle since the nineties. But thanks for your post, we both share an appreciation for Russian history, which is fascinating if frequently a tragedy. Edited by Stirlingsays (02 Feb 2022 5.25pm) Yes, and I did consider that (Ukrainians and Russians = european) I think I was working more from the angle of us vs Nazis and the subsequent teaching of the holocaust etc. It's always going to spike more interest and gain better traction to teach that which people have more association with. I did not mean in anyway to detract from other atrocities that have occurred elsewhere and still recognise the potential of your point and its relevance which you were asserting however I am admittedly just trying to avoid being drawn into a far wider and deeper theoretical discussion! I fear it may outrun my own already limited knowledge and cerebral capacity/stamina! And finally yes, I find Eastern European history genuinely fascinating albeit far too frequently grim, though after my schooling days I would quite happily avoid any discussions regarding Glasnost and Perestroika ever again!
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 02 Feb 22 5.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I remember her at the start, she had comic talent, if not dramatically talented. She was far more libertarian before the woke era....she would do interview shows with people she didn't agree with and actually listen...Now she's a fully signed up member of the progressives and buys into their powerplays and seemingly means it. The contrast to the earlier version of her is quite stark. When you give people licence to show their true colours, this is what happens. They are emboldened to show their prejudice in plain sight.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 02 Feb 22 8.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
When you give people licence to show their true colours, this is what happens. They are emboldened to show their prejudice in plain sight. Of course only whites are racists. Barbary slavery never happened, at all, ever. Blacks never came to Europe and put whites into slavery!!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.