I am not interested in opinion polls and how other people vote is up to them.

There is a distinctive choice this time and I am inclined to Corbyn he is refreshing.

Regarding our electoral system this is the only occasion I have ever voted when it may make any difference to the result at all.

Unless you are in a marginal it is hardly worth voting we are only marginally a democracy.

Are you genuinely trying to compare a government trying to broker a peace deal with Corbyn and his cronies supporting the IRA?

His stance has been well documented.

As for the things he's voted against. It is easy to be a rebel when you're sitting on the back benches. Look at his apparent change on trident

So you like labour but want to sack them?

I like it as they could be elected in that case and be unable to do anything

But they do that is a known fact. Labour think by taxing the better paid people they can make all these wonderful work like, Nationalise the railways, the post office, the water companies etc.. what a load of tosh. It has been proved by George Osborne that by lowering the tax threshold on the rich the government will rake in more money as when you tax the better off with high taxes they either move away or stop in vesting. Labour has ALWAYS been a high taxing and borrowing party and is why we are in the sh1t we are and paying back so much money. Labour if in power would bankrupt the country and we would ALLbe worse off as happened before.

Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky.

Corbyn supported the ceasefire in Northern Ireland, Labour's policy of 'unity by consent' regarding nationalists, and the opening of diplomatic connections between the British government and the political unit of the IRA, Sinn Fein. This, is undeniably comparable to Thatcher's position, the main difference being that Thatcher was a unionist and Corbyn a nationalist.

Regarding Trident, Corbyn ceded to the party vote on Trident, which was to maintain it. But since the leaked manifesto he has spoken repeatedly against Trident and about pushing to renounce it in party policy. Do you think he should've just fully taken over all policy decisions or something? Aren't leader's meant to be tolerant and inclusive in democracies?

Disagree with his stance, by all means, on Irish nationalism and Trident. I can accept that. But why do you peddle bullsh*t about him which is just factually untrue?

Like I say, there are huge parts of the Establishment who would rather a military dictatorship in this country than a man in charge who wants to work mulitlaterally towards world peace. I only have one more question: why do you think none of the mainstream media outlets mention the factthat one of the two favourites for this upcoming election has almost no chance of taking power, even if his party won? Don't you think that it deserves at least to be mentioned?

If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4

What source do you credit for the last paragraph? Which 'huge parts' of establishment do want a military dictatorship instead of Jezza? Have they gone on record with this stance?

Very interested in whom these people are.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02