This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Teddy Eagle 09 Apr 19 10.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
what's your point? You could argue teachers and nurses don't get paid what they're worth and had to suffer years of pay freezes but so what? You could always tithe your wages into a fund for teachers and nurses.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 10 Apr 19 6.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
what's your point? You could argue teachers and nurses don't get paid what they're worth and had to suffer years of pay freezes but so what? They get paid the salary that they accepted when taking the employment.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 10 Apr 19 6.52am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
I am really astounded that you can churn out this absolute rubbish day after day. It was only yesterday that you accused others of being narrow minded yet I doubt whether there is anyone posting anywhere on HOL that is as close minded as you, valiantly trying to defend your position with selected sound bites and ignoring any questions that you don't want to answer
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 10 Apr 19 7.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
They get paid the salary that they accepted when taking the employment. Race to the bottom
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 10 Apr 19 7.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I am really astounded that you can churn out this absolute rubbish day after day. It was only yesterday that you accused others of being narrow minded yet I doubt whether there is anyone posting anywhere on HOL that is as close minded as you, valiantly trying to defend your position with selected sound bites and ignoring any questions that you don't want to answer The point I'm making is the suggestion that the Chancellor bases his economic outlook for Britain on his political leaning whereas I think he Simply looks at it that we would be poorer, GDP and growth would hurt us negatively, you only have to look at the latest IMF forecast that warns of a 2 year recession Edited by Pussay Patrol (10 Apr 2019 7.42am)
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 10 Apr 19 7.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Race to the bottom What’s race got to do with it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 10 Apr 19 7.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The point I'm making is the suggestion that the Chancellor bases his economic outlook for Britain on his political leaning whereas I think he Simply looks at it that we would be poorer, GDP and growth would hurt us negatively, you only have to look at the latest IMF forecast that warns of a 2 year recession Edited by Pussay Patrol (10 Apr 2019 7.42am) Just chuck it on top of the recession that’s been going on since 2008.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 10 Apr 19 8.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The point I'm making is the suggestion that the Chancellor bases his economic outlook for Britain on his political leaning whereas I think he Simply looks at it that we would be poorer, GDP and growth would hurt us negatively, you only have to look at the latest IMF forecast that warns of a 2 year recession Edited by Pussay Patrol (10 Apr 2019 7.42am) Is GDP literally the only thing you care about?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 10 Apr 19 8.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The point I'm making is the suggestion that the Chancellor bases his economic outlook for Britain on his political leaning whereas I think he Simply looks at it that we would be poorer, GDP and growth would hurt us negatively, you only have to look at the latest IMF forecast that warns of a 2 year recession The IMF aren't necessarily correct as very few of these forecasting outfits are. Every year the Office for Budget Responsibility gives it's forecasts for the coming year which the Chancellor bases his budget on. The Chancellor always starts his budget speech by pointing out that the OBR were wrong in the previous year. Even if we leave with no deal it won't take too long to sort out the major trade deals that we want as the framework is already there in the form of the existing EU trade deals. The German economy is so weak that the German industrialists will be pushing Merkel to get the EU to co-operate and the French farmers and car makers will be doing the same to Macron. In the interim many important imports will be tariff free and the European exporters won't be wanting to hold up their own production just to suit the unelected EU top brass who would rather kick the UK in the nuts than support their own members
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 10 Apr 19 8.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Race to the bottom And your lefties wanting to close the wealth gap isnt.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 10 Apr 19 9.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Macron will also demand 'compliance checks' on Britain's behaviour every three months until then, with the threat of ejecting the UK without a deal if Brussels thinks the UK is being disruptive. This measure is designed to stop a new British Prime Minister, such as Boris Johnson, causing trouble within the EU in an attempt to be released early. To counter this threat, the EU will 'Boris-proof' any Brexit delay and refuse to let the UK have any say in future EU budget talks and trade deals in case a new Brexiteer Tory leader starts wreaking havoc, it was revealed today. The above is from an article in today's Mail (I know Mail journalists are now flavour of the month with some posters). So are the EU now dictating to us who we can have as a leader of a main Political Party/Prime Minister? How very democratic, if this does not show the EU up for what they really are I do not what does. Or is it that they are s****ing themselves that, with a change of leadership, we just might tell them to do one Interesting wrangling currently going on in Europe. We often get caught up in the drama of our our own politicians and forget to consider what's going on in the rest of the world. Ireland have said that they will never forgive any of the EU27 that triggers a no deal. Germany definitely don't want a no deal. France, being the french, are willing to let the whole thing go to hell. The EU don't want us involved in their elections. As we will inevitably cause loads of trouble. A no deal could split the EU, as could allowing us into their elections. Europe has loads of problems at the moment and Brexit is overshaddowing them all. What really strikes me as strange is that since the referendum, they haven't even considered that they might be doing something wrong or any kind of reform. Surely, it's the first thing any organisation would do following a catastrophic event.... they have introduced a law on memes though, everyone's top priority.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 10 Apr 19 9.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The point I'm making is the suggestion that the Chancellor bases his economic outlook for Britain on his political leaning whereas I think he Simply looks at it that we would be poorer, GDP and growth would hurt us negatively, you only have to look at the latest IMF forecast that warns of a 2 year recession Edited by Pussay Patrol (10 Apr 2019 7.42am) The same IMF that have down-graded their global forecasts three times in the last 6months. Stop cherry-picking.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.