Judges should not have any bias and should not influence the jury but advise them on the law.

I can't recall recently such such blatant interference, the jury decide on what they have heard, not on a judges personal interpretation of events.

We all know that if this boy was black he would have been found guilty.

To think you can get away with murdering 2 people because you are a white boy.

Judges should not have any bias and should not influence the jury but advise them on the law.

I can't recall recently such such blatant interference, the jury decide on what they have heard, not on a judges personal interpretation of events.

We all know that if this boy was black he would have been found guilty.

To think you can get away with murdering 2 people because you are a white boy.

Well done Kyle.
Justice has been served.
And thank you for sending the vile left into absolute meltdown.
Cant stop laughing ha ha ha.

I just also want to make the point that the Democratic media use the full extent of the first amendment rights to propagandize, omit and suggest as fully as they can.

The smaller Republican media also do the same.

However, what is of full note here is that only one side in this situation wants to restrict free speech.....to change the intent of the first amendment....All in service of their own opinions.

All while they hypocritically fully stretch its boundaries every day.

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Nov 2021 10.17am)

This is, regrettably, more bs.

No-one at all wants to restrict free speech.

However, if any freedom is used irresponsibly, then sometimes restrictions become necessary.

As I have said many times, the idea of anything being totally unrestricted in a democracy is a myth. It's an argument for anarchy.

So restricting hate speech, and such things as incentives to commit crimes, are perfectly acceptable.

Only the bonkers cannot understand that.

Now to watch the game!