This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 16 2.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Perhaps. When you've dealt with the wilful obtuseness of the likes of Kermit, and a complete unwillingness to actually accept a spectrum of opinion, it becomes exasperating. He was essentially arguing (as he continued to do in his follow-up) that an economic forecast from one side is any less a "leap in the dark" than a forecast from the other side. It is either intellectual dishonesty or complete ignorance. I'm not sure I care too much either way. So yes, I offer Kermit an apology and a shrug of the shoulders. He's made his mind up, and no alternative economic models nor dissenting opinion will change it. Likewise I. The difference is, I've formed my opinion from a spectrum of sources, weighted by their gains and vested interests. I'd also like to apologise to nickgusset for use of his Surname. I'll add I don't mind being called "Monkey", but it's a matter of preference. For the record, I at least find his replies (for the most part) more considered. Thank you Dave, I like to think that if a debate is reasonable in tone, then it works better. There are one or 2 people for whom this is impossible granted. Of course we also have the option of light Hearted pish taking on here too...but there's a place for that. For me, that's what sets the HOL apart from the bbs. There's some downright nasty comments over there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Jun 16 2.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Thank you Dave, I like to think that if a debate is reasonable in tone, then it works better. There are one or 2 people for whom this is impossible granted. Of course we also have the option of light Hearted pish taking on here too...but there's a place for that. For me, that's what sets the HOL apart from the bbs. There's some downright nasty comments over there. There are some downright nasty people on it and running it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 13 Jun 16 3.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Interestingly, this is also why I'm voting out, not because I necessarily think the UK will be better off in my lifetime, but so as to at least obtain the capacity to make those changes that are necessary to the UK national interest. The EU should exist to facilitate the interests of member states, not to dictate corporate agendas. I doubt that any government is going to implement the reasons why I want to separate the UK from the EU, but it would at least retain that capacity for future governments who may be more socially orientated. Nicely phrased (as usual). I believe it is naive to think that corporations will not influence our lives no matter what but at least by leaving, we cam dismantle some of the mechanisms that will make it easier for them to do so and give the domestic government the ability to bypass Euro inertia on issues that effect Britain specifically.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
snytaxx London 13 Jun 16 4.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Thought Jack Nicholson was great in the Shinning. I've noticed that a lot of the undecideds I've spoken to or read are the ones who have read most widely on both sides of the argument. One hopes that it will provide a bit more clarity to help me make a sound judgement. Also, I asked the other day whether brexiters had any concerns about leaving, conversely any remainers had any concerns about staying. No responses to that so far. This is a shame because anyone should realise that obviously there are pros and cons to both sides of the argument. Edited by nickgusset (12 Jun 2016 3.59pm) Thank you Nicholas for your response and your links. To give you a straight answer, yes i do have some reservations. Although I don't think anything will change (much) for the first to years post Brexit, I believe as the deadline does tick away there will be some slight economic turbulence. In order to demonstrate that I do infact have a sense of humour, I will explain my reservations as depicted by the popular motion film, Interstellar. I believe that as our spaceship 'Endurance' launches (a Brexit vote) away from our dying planet (the EU), lots of people back home will be like "oh well what now?" while others aimlessly screech "THERE ISN'T ANYTHING WRONG WITH OUR PLANET AHHHHHHHHHH". Then comes the awkward wait as Endurance (the UK) just drifts towards the wormhole by Saturn (the two year notice period). As the UK finally reaches the worm hole things will be a bit shaky for a few moments as the UK passes through it, David Cameron's disembodied hand will appear at this point and shake the hand on his successor. The UK will then probably have the idea of leaving the EU but staying in the single market, it will plop itself down on a seemingly hospitable planet only to discover it faces an tidal wave of further EU sanctions and freedom of labour demands. After wasting alot of time stuck on the Wave Planet (the single market), the UK will finally escape again with a slight amount of uncertainty. Our solution will be to look to our MP's (Matt Damon) who while at first pretending to be on the side of the Brexit majority, only want to go home to the failing EU. There will be a constitutional crisis with many in the 'Join' camp just yelling "AAAAAHHHHH RACISM EVERYWHERE" as they launch their political coup. They will try to manually re-enter the EU but be blasted out to the void (back benches) by their own incompetence. Boris Johnson with the help of a robotic Michael Gove will save the UK from crashing, but at a terrible cost of time and people patience. With not enough willpower from the electorate we will then have no choice but to eject our politicians into the blackhole of trade deal negotiations with huge superpowers such as the USA, China, India etc. Somehow, our politicians will be able to signal to the ordinary folk back in the UK that its entirely possible for everyone to leave the idea of trading with a failing EU and instead step into whole new galaxy as we look at what the BRIC country planets and commonwealth solar systems have to offer. We all live happily ever after, except for last remaining hold outs of the rapidly receding 'JOIN' campaign who sit in our new found economic boom with their arms folding saying "I miss the days when we had to bail the Greeks out".
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 16 5.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by snytaxx
Thank you Nicholas for your response and your links. To give you a straight answer, yes i do have some reservations. Although I don't think anything will change (much) for the first to years post Brexit, I believe as the deadline does tick away there will be some slight economic turbulence. In order to demonstrate that I do infact have a sense of humour, I will explain my reservations as depicted by the popular motion film, Interstellar. I believe that as our spaceship 'Endurance' launches (a Brexit vote) away from our dying planet (the EU), lots of people back home will be like "oh well what now?" while others aimlessly screech "THERE ISN'T ANYTHING WRONG WITH OUR PLANET AHHHHHHHHHH". Then comes the awkward wait as Endurance (the UK) just drifts towards the wormhole by Saturn (the two year notice period). As the UK finally reaches the worm hole things will be a bit shaky for a few moments as the UK passes through it, David Cameron's disembodied hand will appear at this point and shake the hand on his successor. The UK will then probably have the idea of leaving the EU but staying in the single market, it will plop itself down on a seemingly hospitable planet only to discover it faces an tidal wave of further EU sanctions and freedom of labour demands. After wasting alot of time stuck on the Wave Planet (the single market), the UK will finally escape again with a slight amount of uncertainty. Our solution will be to look to our MP's (Matt Damon) who while at first pretending to be on the side of the Brexit majority, only want to go home to the failing EU. There will be a constitutional crisis with many in the 'Join' camp just yelling "AAAAAHHHHH RACISM EVERYWHERE" as they launch their political coup. They will try to manually re-enter the EU but be blasted out to the void (back benches) by their own incompetence. Boris Johnson with the help of a robotic Michael Gove will save the UK from crashing, but at a terrible cost of time and people patience. With not enough willpower from the electorate we will then have no choice but to eject our politicians into the blackhole of trade deal negotiations with huge superpowers such as the USA, China, India etc. Somehow, our politicians will be able to signal to the ordinary folk back in the UK that its entirely possible for everyone to leave the idea of trading with a failing EU and instead step into whole new galaxy as we look at what the BRIC country planets and commonwealth solar systems have to offer. We all live happily ever after, except for last remaining hold outs of the rapidly receding 'JOIN' campaign who sit in our new found economic boom with their arms folding saying "I miss the days when we had to bail the Greeks out". You bustard, I was going to watch that tonight. Next I expect to see a synopsis of the consequences of Brexit through the prism of The Likely Lads or Saturday Night Fever.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
We are goin up! Coulsdon 13 Jun 16 5.24pm | |
---|---|
I think we're going to bloody do it. Exciting. Give Cameron/Osborne a good f*cking kick, and I cannot wait to see the look on their stupid f*cking faces.
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 13 Jun 16 5.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Perhaps. When you've dealt with the wilful obtuseness of the likes of Kermit, and a complete unwillingness to actually accept a spectrum of opinion, it becomes exasperating. He was essentially arguing (as he continued to do in his follow-up) that an economic forecast from one side is any less a "leap in the dark" than a forecast from the other side. It is either intellectual dishonesty or complete ignorance. I'm not sure I care too much either way. So yes, I offer Kermit an apology and a shrug of the shoulders. He's made his mind up, and no alternative economic models nor dissenting opinion will change it. Likewise I. The difference is, I've formed my opinion from a spectrum of sources, weighted by their gains and vested interests. I'd also like to apologise to nickgusset for use of his Surname. I'll add I don't mind being called "Monkey", but it's a matter of preference. For the record, I at least find his replies (for the most part) more considered. And what you don't seem to be able to take on board is that the Brexiteers economic projections are much more based on optimistic and somewhat airy-fairy hopes built on nothing more at the moment than hot air and bullishness: 'That'll be an extra £350mill a week for the NHS guv'. Whereas EU economic projections are based are they not on things such as markets, contemporary conditions, future variables, historical flow charts, evidence-based analysis, etc. Real stuff. Have a look a historical EU economic growth predictions over the last 15 or so years. Then let's see if still want to propose the two schools of predictions as being deserving of the same level of critical analysis. That they are both as you think, essentially, the same thing. The EU is real. There are facts and figures from past and present to fall back on when making predictions. Brexit and the future within exists only in your head. Tell you what though. I have a prediction. I predict you will come back with some oh so cutting words to make you feel superior and right. It won't wash though. You may be articulate but you are also blinkered and a bit naive. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Jun 2016 5.32pm)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 13 Jun 16 7.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
And what you don't seem to be able to take on board is that the Brexiteers economic projections are much more based on optimistic and somewhat airy-fairy hopes built on nothing more at the moment than hot air and bullishness: 'That'll be an extra £350mill a week for the NHS guv'. Whereas EU economic projections are based are they not on things such as markets, contemporary conditions, future variables, historical flow charts, evidence-based analysis, etc. Real stuff.
What exactly are these projections based on that's more tangible than hard cash? Let's use a conservative estimate on £100m after rebates. +£52bn It's quite easy to pick only the figures from one column and that's clearly how these politicised predictions are fabricated and if you're using an assumed EU growth against post Brexit UK contraction then you're doing the same.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leifandersonshair Newport 13 Jun 16 10.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by johnfirewall
What exactly are these projections based on that's more tangible than hard cash? Let's use a conservative estimate on £100m after rebates. +£52bn It's quite easy to pick only the figures from one column and that's clearly how these politicised predictions are fabricated and if you're using an assumed EU growth against post Brexit UK contraction then you're doing the same. Don't like to nitpick, but... 52 £100 millions is £5.2 billion, isn't it? Although I think it depends whether it's UK or US billions... Slightly more on topic- both sides are pulling BS figures from thin air, about the economy will lose this, the economy will gain this... honestly, the only hard fact is the position we have now, as a member of the EU. Brexit might mean in 5 years time we are living in a bright and prosperous land of rainbows and lollipops, where everyone owns a Ferrari. It might mean we are royally screwed. Similarly, the EU's position (financially and politically) could be vastly different in 5 years. We could be where we are now, a member of a large and prosperous trading bloc. It could be a future where we are trapped in a failing EU, swamped by failing poorer economies being continually bailed out (mostly by us and the Germans). But that's the point- NO ONE KNOWS. On June 23rd people will have to decide based on 2 uncertain futures, and 2 uncertain options. Plenty of people have made their minds up (most of the people on here it appears, certainly, including me). Plenty haven't, or will be swayed by what they read in tomorrows paper, or hear on the BBC next week. Or how England have done in the Euro's. Or whether they got laid the night before the vote. Plenty of time for more swings, more silly headlines, and more scaremongering before we have to vote!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 13 Jun 16 11.15pm | |
---|---|
For all the people who are saying eu migrants are bringing the NHS to breaking point, It's B/S Still at least everyone will notice the tiny corrections and clarifications section. Surely far more than those who saw the original front page headline that claimed it was. I think if a paper prints b/s and is ordered to retract the article, it should at minimum take up the same amount of space and use the same size headline as the original b/s article.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 14 Jun 16 12.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
And what you don't seem to be able to take on board is that the Brexiteers economic projections are much more based on optimistic and somewhat airy-fairy hopes built on nothing more at the moment than hot air and bullishness: 'That'll be an extra £350mill a week for the NHS guv'. Whereas EU economic projections are based are they not on things such as markets, contemporary conditions, future variables, historical flow charts, evidence-based analysis, etc. Real stuff. Have a look a historical EU economic growth predictions over the last 15 or so years. Then let's see if still want to propose the two schools of predictions as being deserving of the same level of critical analysis. That they are both as you think, essentially, the same thing. The EU is real. There are facts and figures from past and present to fall back on when making predictions. Brexit and the future within exists only in your head. Tell you what though. I have a prediction. I predict you will come back with some oh so cutting words to make you feel superior and right. It won't wash though. You may be articulate but you are also blinkered and a bit naive. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Jun 2016 5.32pm) LOL Kettle (EU Regulated Pot) Black
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 14 Jun 16 12.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
And what you don't seem to be able to take on board is that the Brexiteers economic projections are much more based on optimistic and somewhat airy-fairy hopes built on nothing more at the moment than hot air and bullishness: 'That'll be an extra £350mill a week for the NHS guv'. Whereas EU economic projections are based are they not on things such as markets, contemporary conditions, future variables, historical flow charts, evidence-based analysis, etc. Real stuff. Have a look a historical EU economic growth predictions over the last 15 or so years. Then let's see if still want to propose the two schools of predictions as being deserving of the same level of critical analysis. That they are both as you think, essentially, the same thing. The EU is real. There are facts and figures from past and present to fall back on when making predictions. Brexit and the future within exists only in your head. Tell you what though. I have a prediction. I predict you will come back with some oh so cutting words to make you feel superior and right. It won't wash though. You may be articulate but you are also blinkered and a bit naive. Edited by Kermit8 (13 Jun 2016 5.32pm) Wrong. As I have repeatedly said on here: 1. The treasury has made only a positive case for the EU, with no consideration of the associated risks of remaining. The below peer reviewed article (published 5 days ago) highlights (as with the Lilico piece) the poor (I'm being kind with "poor" choice of input assumptions, leading to unrealistic (I'm again being kind) economic outcomes of a Brexit. Or in the words of the author, Prof. David Blake: "On the extraordinary abuse of economic models in the EU Referendum debate" You can read the executive summary - that's enough. You still won't accept it, nor believe it. I've been reading through it all, as it is quite interesting just how terribly unscientific the Treasury approach was: it really does highlight the clear agenda to mislead and scare. Do feel free to do a google search in a desperate attempt to discredit this one as well. I don't really care anymore. I'm providing links and contributions for those on here that are still deciding, and willing to actually look beyond the "grossly exaggerated claims" (p2) by a "British Treasury has in effect become a propaganda machine for a political institution" (p.56) So, whilst this peer-reviewed article disagrees with you, you know better. Of course you do.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.