This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 11 Nov 23 2.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by rob1861
Hey all, i was chatting to a dad at my son's football match today and his firm are one of two remaining contenders for a contract to be a part of the build of the new main stand at Selhurst Park. I'm avoiding giving more details in case it could cause an issue. Hopefully this is good news that we will actually see the build happening in our lifetime and Parish will deliver once again on his promises!!! I really hope he doesn't hand the baton on once the main stand is built. I know we all have different views on his achievements but he has been brilliant as far as i can see.
If your info is legit you would give the names of the people who are in the running this is not an issue and not secret info so the whole cause issues is BS that is not how construction industry works. Palace has had no real interest from people to take over so why would SP just leave plus this is the biggest pay package he has ever received in his current role.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 11 Nov 23 2.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by grumpymort
If your info is legit you would give the names of the people who are in the running this is not an issue and not secret info so the whole cause issues is BS that is not how construction industry works. Palace has had no real interest from people to take over so why would SP just leave plus this is the biggest pay package he has ever received in his current role. It must be quite wearing being a PL football chairman and having to deal with the day to day issues that happen at football clubs. I am happy with Parish and don't want him to go but I could see a situation where after the stadium has been rebuilt he feels this is a major accomplishment along with keeping us in the PL. He's 58 now so could be sixty when the build is complete, perhaps he may want to re-consider his priorities?
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rob1861 11 Nov 23 4.57pm | |
---|---|
Your name suits you, grumpymort. Have you ever considered the tender might be private at this stage and could cause issues for those involved if i reveal details? Also, you don't have to believe me, i don't really care. I heard it and thought i'd pass it on. You can take it or leave it. Finally Grumpy - here is chat GPTs gathering of legislative requirements surrounding privacy in a construction tender process In the UK, the confidentiality of information during construction tenders, particularly for private companies, is governed by various legal frameworks and practices. 1. **General Legal Framework for Protecting Confidential Information**: 2. **Specifics in Private Sector Construction Tenders**: 3. **Confidentiality During the Tender Process**: In summary, in the UK, the confidentiality of information during construction tenders is protected under both common law and specific regulations like the Trade Secrets Regulations. The legal frameworks emphasize the importance of fairness and the protection of confidential information, with specific guidelines and legal precedents underscoring these principles. This legal landscape ensures that while the tender process is competitive and transparent, sensitive business information remains protected. Originally posted by grumpymort
If your info is legit you would give the names of the people who are in the running this is not an issue and not secret info so the whole cause issues is BS that is not how construction industry works. Palace has had no real interest from people to take over so why would SP just leave plus this is the biggest pay package he has ever received in his current role. Edited by rob1861 (11 Nov 2023 4.58pm) Edited by rob1861 (11 Nov 2023 5.12pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
tonymikejoe UK 11 Nov 23 6.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by doombear
The prices will be silly.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dreamwaverider London 11 Nov 23 7.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by rob1861
Your name suits you, grumpymort. Have you ever considered the tender might be private at this stage and could cause issues for those involved if i reveal details? Also, you don't have to believe me, i don't really care. I heard it and thought i'd pass it on. You can take it or leave it. Finally Grumpy - here is chat GPTs gathering of legislative requirements surrounding privacy in a construction tender process In the UK, the confidentiality of information during construction tenders, particularly for private companies, is governed by various legal frameworks and practices. 1. **General Legal Framework for Protecting Confidential Information**: 2. **Specifics in Private Sector Construction Tenders**: 3. **Confidentiality During the Tender Process**: In summary, in the UK, the confidentiality of information during construction tenders is protected under both common law and specific regulations like the Trade Secrets Regulations. The legal frameworks emphasize the importance of fairness and the protection of confidential information, with specific guidelines and legal precedents underscoring these principles. This legal landscape ensures that while the tender process is competitive and transparent, sensitive business information remains protected.
Edited by rob1861 (11 Nov 2023 5.12pm) Very good call Rob. If I were you I would drop this topic now.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
akiisalegend Croydon 11 Nov 23 7.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by rob1861
Hey all, i was chatting to a dad at my son's football match today and his firm are one of two remaining contenders for a contract to be a part of the build of the new main stand at Selhurst Park. I'm avoiding giving more details in case it could cause an issue. Hopefully this is good news that we will actually see the build happening in our lifetime and Parish will deliver once again on his promises!!! I really hope he doesn't hand the baton on once the main stand is built. I know we all have different views on his achievements but he has been brilliant as far as i can see. . Edited by akiisalegend (11 Nov 2023 7.53pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 11 Nov 23 10.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by rob1861
Your name suits you, grumpymort. Have you ever considered the tender might be private at this stage and could cause issues for those involved if i reveal details? Also, you don't have to believe me, i don't really care. I heard it and thought i'd pass it on. You can take it or leave it. Finally Grumpy - here is chat GPTs gathering of legislative requirements surrounding privacy in a construction tender process In the UK, the confidentiality of information during construction tenders, particularly for private companies, is governed by various legal frameworks and practices. 1. **General Legal Framework for Protecting Confidential Information**: 2. **Specifics in Private Sector Construction Tenders**: 3. **Confidentiality During the Tender Process**: In summary, in the UK, the confidentiality of information during construction tenders is protected under both common law and specific regulations like the Trade Secrets Regulations. The legal frameworks emphasize the importance of fairness and the protection of confidential information, with specific guidelines and legal precedents underscoring these principles. This legal landscape ensures that while the tender process is competitive and transparent, sensitive business information remains protected.
Edited by rob1861 (11 Nov 2023 5.12pm)
As I said you clearly know nothing about the construction industry after I had seen your first post I had a chat with some one I know who is very high ranked in Kier and I showed them what you posted they laughed. People in the industry will know about who is going for jobs its no secret what you posted you clearly have no understanding giving out two say companies names in the running is not any breach. Yes if people start to talk about money etc that is different matter. The industry is one of the most corrupt anyway most deals are under the table perks going on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
rikz Croydon 07 Dec 23 4.18pm | |
---|---|
Listening to Simon Jordan on talksport, on the stadium rebuild. It will never happen, he knows it won't happen because it can't happen.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
AERO 07 Dec 23 4.23pm | |
---|---|
Why won't it happen i know funding is a problem but think not sumountable and the hard work has been done regarding the planning.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
AERO 07 Dec 23 4.35pm | |
---|---|
Unsamontable
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
est1905 07 Dec 23 4.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by grumpymort
If your info is legit you would give the names of the people who are in the running this is not an issue and not secret info so the whole cause issues is BS that is not how construction industry works. Palace has had no real interest from people to take over so why would SP just leave plus this is the biggest pay package he has ever received in his current role. There is such a thing as 'closed' or 'private' tender submissions. Businesses/investors/even banks on large projects often dont want the public to know of their involvement, sometimes even if they are successful.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 07 Dec 23 6.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by rikz
Listening to Simon Jordan on talksport, on the stadium rebuild. It will never happen, he knows it won't happen because it can't happen. Seems a well oiled mayor goes a long way . Raising the money will be a challenge when we need loads for the squad .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.