This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 28 Dec 22 11.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
so I am not on anyone’s side but if this woman is an activist with previous; then surely removing her from the area is reasonable and legal. You get it! Thanks for talking sense. I used the M25 analogy myself earlier. It produced denials!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
berlinpalace berlin 28 Dec 22 11.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So we can determine intentions? Remember the Sus law? That was a raging success Not a useful comparison as ‘sus’ was used indiscriminately and rarely discovered anything, in this case they actually targeted and arrested someone loitering with intent, maybe if they’d harassed dozens of random white women in the same area your point would be relevant.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 28 Dec 22 11.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So we can determine intentions? Remember the Sus law? That was a raging success She was there, again, focusing on the abortion clinic. That is all we need to know. And that is why she was arrested yet again. She intended to be there, she wasn’t a bystander. As such she wilfully broke the law, one which she had broken many times before and knew all about.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 28 Dec 22 11.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
Not a useful comparison as ‘sus’ was used indiscriminately and rarely discovered anything, in this case they actually targeted and arrested someone loitering with intent, maybe if they’d harassed dozens of random white women in the same area your point would be relevant. Give them time. The Sus law had been around for 150 years as opposed to a few months.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
berlinpalace berlin 28 Dec 22 11.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Give them time. The Sus law had been around for 150 years as opposed to a few months. Oh, so now it doesn’t fit your agenda you want to move into the realm of supposition. Whatever.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 29 Dec 22 12.13am | |
---|---|
In the video at the start of this thread the policeman specifically asks the woman if she is praying, she says maybe in my head and he then arrests her. i.e the admission of possibly silently praying triggered the arrest. Edited by HKOwen (29 Dec 2022 12.14am)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 29 Dec 22 12.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
In the video at the start of this thread the policeman specifically asks the woman if she is praying, she says maybe in my head and he then arrests her. i.e the admission of possibly silently praying triggered the arrest. Edited by HKOwen (29 Dec 2022 12.14am) Was that really the first part of the video though. Experience on the media says there was a chance it wasn’t or was a reply to her statement.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 29 Dec 22 12.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
Oh, so now it doesn’t fit your agenda you want to move into the realm of supposition. Whatever. Seems appropriate since the whole case was based on supposition.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 29 Dec 22 1.16am | |
---|---|
imagine if she was praying , not to the christian god, but to one of the more recent Gods ? i bet the cops would have been a lot more 'polite & respectful' ?
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OldFella London 29 Dec 22 6.28am | |
---|---|
Would support the police closely monitoring/possibly arresting anyone with imaginary friends. Might clean the place up a bit tbh.
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
berlinpalace berlin 29 Dec 22 8.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Seems appropriate since the whole case was based on supposition. There’s no supposition here, the video clearly shows a known activist in an area she is banned from protesting in. There are some desperate attempts to claim she was arrested for a “thought crime “ when the simple fact is she wasn’t supposed to be there.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 29 Dec 22 9.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by berlinpalace
There’s no supposition here, the video clearly shows a known activist in an area she is banned from protesting in. There are some desperate attempts to claim she was arrested for a “thought crime “ when the simple fact is she wasn’t supposed to be there. I think this is the crux of the matter. Rather than a specific defence of this lady; it's concern that these restrictions might be extended to include other protesters in less emotive circumstances.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.