This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay UK 18 Nov 21 10.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
For once I actually believe the Guardian who claim that the new rules on second jobs will only impact 10 MPs. Some of us predicted that they would weasel their way out of it, they really think the voters are stupid. It appears to be so endemic that they can't bring themselves to bring in rules that substantively do anything about it. I had thought that claims of it being a conservative issue were just partisanship but if you see the numbers it's literally almost exclusively tories with second jobs and 'consultancy' roles, raking in millions. Really though regardless of a persons politics this is terrible as it's a key elements of corporations having a voice that those casting a vote lack, and all that this then leads to. It's a shame that the other thread led to a tonne of 'but what about labour!' from some, as 1) evidentially this presently far more concentrated in one party 2) any changes brought in that clamp down on this impact all parties anyway so such distractions are counterproductive to a solution 3) the core of so many (almost all) problems in society realistically comes down to corporate influence and who's getting paid, so we should be laser focused on it rather than fob it off.
If anything solving problems like this are as important as who we vote for, as money and jobs for influence only seeks to silence the voice of the people and drain money by the billion from the tax payer without us getting much of anything to show for it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 18 Nov 21 10.16am | |
---|---|
One thing I haven't seen yet is what is role the Unions play with Labour MPs? Are Labour MP's sponsored by Unions, are they consultants? I'm not sure what the setup is but if they are being financially incentivised this is no different than a Tory being a consultant, both are wrong because they are lobbying.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 18 Nov 21 10.21am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
It appears to be so endemic that they can't bring themselves to bring in rules that substantively do anything about it. I had thought that claims of it being a conservative issue were just partisanship but if you see the numbers it's literally almost exclusively tories with second jobs and 'consultancy' roles, raking in millions. Really though regardless of a persons politics this is terrible as it's a key elements of corporations having a voice that those casting a vote lack, and all that this then leads to. It's a shame that the other thread led to a tonne of 'but what about labour!' from some, as 1) evidentially this presently far more concentrated in one party 2) any changes brought in that clamp down on this impact all parties anyway so such distractions are counterproductive to a solution 3) the core of so many (almost all) problems in society realistically comes down to corporate influence and who's getting paid, so we should be laser focused on it rather than fob it off.
If anything solving problems like this are as important as who we vote for, as money and jobs for influence only seeks to silence the voice of the people and drain money by the billion from the tax payer without us getting much of anything to show for it. Great post, and completely agree - I find many Tory-voters apathy to this, and indeed the PPE stuff, nothing short of disgraceful - to me, these issues should transcend your personal politics. This isn't being a bit wasteful, or making a wrong decision, it's overt, deliberate corruption, and no amount of whatabouttery is going to convince me I shouldn't be outraged by it. And before someone tells me "they're all at it", it's simply not true on the same scale and quantity.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 18 Nov 21 10.23am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
One thing I haven't seen yet is what is role the Unions play with Labour MPs? Are Labour MP's sponsored by Unions, are they consultants? I'm not sure what the setup is but if they are being financially incentivised this is no different than a Tory being a consultant, both are wrong because they are lobbying. Good point. Any avenue of undue influence outside of voters should be scrutinised and acted upon. If there was any teeth to this standards rule change we might be on our way to achieving something like that across the board. From what you highlight though, it looks more like an exercise in tinkering around the edges to make the story go away.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Nov 21 10.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Great post, and completely agree - I find many Tory-voters apathy to this, and indeed the PPE stuff, nothing short of disgraceful - to me, these issues should transcend your personal politics. This isn't being a bit wasteful, or making a wrong decision, it's overt, deliberate corruption, and no amount of whatabouttery is going to convince me I shouldn't be outraged by it. And before someone tells me "they're all at it", it's simply not true on the same scale and quantity. The difference is that the Tories are in government, as usual. Labour have always been corrupt, and they just love spending your money.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 18 Nov 21 11.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The difference is that the Tories are in government, as usual. Labour have always been corrupt, and they just love spending your money. This Tory government have spent more every year that they've been in power than any year that the last Labour government were in power. Everything you post is just based on lazy stereotypes with no independent thinking or research isn't it?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 18 Nov 21 11.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
This Tory government have spent more every year that they've been in power than any year that the last Labour government were in power. Everything you post is just based on lazy stereotypes with no independent thinking or research isn't it? It's the pointless whataboutism that I was highlighting. The type of behaviour that distracts from snouts in the trough, whoever they happen to be attached to at the time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Nov 21 11.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
This Tory government have spent more every year that they've been in power than any year that the last Labour government were in power. Everything you post is just based on lazy stereotypes with no independent thinking or research isn't it? And there is a good reason for that, as you know full well. I vote for the least worst option and sadly, there are only two viable choices, one of which is unelectable.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 18 Nov 21 12.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
And there is a good reason for that, as you know full well. I vote for the least worst option and sadly, there are only two viable choices, one of which is unelectable. Lazy soundbite bingo.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Nov 21 12.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Lazy soundbite bingo. The evidence says otherwise.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
crystal-purley Purley 18 Nov 21 12.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
This Tory government have spent more every year that they've been in power than any year that the last Labour government were in power. Everything you post is just based on lazy stereotypes with no independent thinking or research isn't it? And a further £450bn was repaid by the banks during the Con years which makes it all the more wobbly.
Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course). |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 18 Nov 21 1.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
And there is a good reason for that, as you know full well. *but I'll endlessly solely prattle on about Labour anyway and make no meaningful or relevant contributions about the topic at hand. Edited by BlueJay (18 Nov 2021 1.12pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.