You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Who is to blame?
November 22 2024 9.18pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Who is to blame?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 16 of 36 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

  

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Dec 19 9.54am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Seems fair. The country vote for a party to govern and that parties members vote for the person to lead it. 200,000 voters is better than 350 odd.

Just wrong. You don't vote for a party. You vote for an MP. That many people don't understand the difference is very unfortunate but doesn't change the facts. Having parties standing behind them allows the system to work but must not be allowed to interfere with the duty of every MP to use their conscience to decide how they themselves vote. The increasing degree of centralisation means that we have no idea who is actually determining policy. It isn't the MPs themselves and they are our representatives.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 16 Dec 19 9.55am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You conclude incorrectly. I am not tribal. I am a member of More United.

Erm. You signed up to More United. That is as tribal as any other political allegiance.
Since most of the people on the list are Labour MPs, one has to imagine that you are basically a socialist.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Dec 19 9.56am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle


Fair enough but did they then have to give their commitment without actually knowing what the manifesto said?

I am not aware of any formal committment required in terms of the manifesto.

But of course candidates of whatever hue would be expected to be supportive of the manifestos of their respective parties.

Have to depart now to enjoy a coffee and cake with my Conservative chums!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 16 Dec 19 10.02am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Just wrong. You don't vote for a party. You vote for an MP. That many people don't understand the difference is very unfortunate but doesn't change the facts. Having parties standing behind them allows the system to work but must not be allowed to interfere with the duty of every MP to use their conscience to decide how they themselves vote. The increasing degree of centralisation means that we have no idea who is actually determining policy. It isn't the MPs themselves and they are our representatives.

Wisbech that is your opinion not everyone agrees with it. Unless I am mistakened not one of the MPs who changed parties was re-elected they either retired or lost. You have an idealised version of what Parliament should be and in theory it would be great if it worked that way.

But as I just posted on the Brexit thread for example Labour's position to oppose any Tory Brexit deal before it had even been negotiated is the reality of Parliament.

Politicians are partisan and oppose the other side even when the other side is talking sense.

By all means continue to call for MPs to be independent of the party machine but you will be howling in the wind. I wish you luck it's not a bad thing if it ever happened.

A more realistic solution is to vote for independent MPs. I have a friend who is an independent councillor in Froome where all seats are held by local independent people and the public love it.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 16 Dec 19 10.08am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I seldom waste my time responding to your posts as I find that you are as narrow minded as my dog when there is food about so any response is generally a complete waste of time but I would point out that your definition of democracy is at odds with that of our Prime Minister who said in his speech over the weekend that MPs should never forget that they are the servants of the people and not their masters and they should remember that they should carry out the will of the people that elected them.

Your statement about drifting towards a "pseudo dictatorship" is as daft as much of the other drivel that you post. We have just had a General Election in which every citizen over the age of 18 cast their vote for whomever they wished.

People allegedly turned their backs on Corbyn as they didn't like him or what he represented and anyone who voted Conservative was just as free to do the same and cast their vote elsewhere,

Nigel Farage said that he intended to spoil his ballot paper and that avenue was open to everyone else that wished to make a point but it seems that the majority were happy to freely vote for your so called dictator.

Your side has lost now twice so just get over it

To suggest that I am narrow minded is a little rich given the general level of one track thought to be found here!

The PM is right, but only up to a point. MPs are the servants of the people who voted for them. This in turn means that they are NOT the servants of a party machine. To serve those people requires them, and not the machine, to determine what the will of the people electing them really is. This long established principle is now under threat by the moves to exert pressure and reinterpret the role of the MP. I regard it as a dangerous threat to our democracy and taken to its ultimate conclusion would see us ending up with an ineffective Parliament and the real power held in the shadows. I regret that some of you don't see that but I am far from alone and as this Parliament proceeds expect to see this issue aired many times.

This is not a simple party issue. It would be equally, if not more, dangerous, if we had a far left government. If we allow this drift to continue you may all come to regret not having resisted it now.

It has nothing whatsoever with how or why people cast their votes or spoiled them.

I don't have a side! I support the supremacy of individual MPs and Parliament as a whole. I support our country and not one section of it.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 16 Dec 19 10.27am Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

To suggest that I am narrow minded is a little rich given the general level of one track thought to be found here!

The PM is right, but only up to a point. MPs are the servants of the people who voted for them. This in turn means that they are NOT the servants of a party machine. To serve those people requires them, and not the machine, to determine what the will of the people electing them really is. This long established principle is now under threat by the moves to exert pressure and reinterpret the role of the MP. I regard it as a dangerous threat to our democracy and taken to its ultimate conclusion would see us ending up with an ineffective Parliament and the real power held in the shadows. I regret that some of you don't see that but I am far from alone and as this Parliament proceeds expect to see this issue aired many times.

This is not a simple party issue. It would be equally, if not more, dangerous, if we had a far left government. If we allow this drift to continue you may all come to regret not having resisted it now.

It has nothing whatsoever with how or why people cast their votes or spoiled them.

I don't have a side! I support the supremacy of individual MPs and Parliament as a whole. I support our country and not one section of it.

The parties have been around for hundreds of years. As has the system of the party whip. There have been some notable defections over the years - probably Churchill being the most high profile. They are the exception rather than the rule, however. People have always voted on party lines in Britain - often regardless of the MP.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 16 Dec 19 10.29am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Just wrong. You don't vote for a party. You vote for an MP. That many people don't understand the difference is very unfortunate but doesn't change the facts.

Yet again you are posting your ideals as fact and as usual it's all Bollox.

People vote for a variety of different reasons whether that fits in with your ideals or not. A woman on Radio 5 this morning said that she voted Labour because she always had done and so had her family. Should I have telephoned in and told her that she was wrong as Wisbech Eagle said so?

There were also rumours a few years ago that many women voted Labour because their new leader was good looking and certainly many people were put off voting Conservative as they didn't like Theresa May.

Please stop posting your ideas and opinions as fact

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
W12 16 Dec 19 10.46am

Labour lost because they have become a Marxist cult and are followed and represented by people of the "quality" of Owen Jones, David Lammmy, Ash Sarkar, numerous vacuous celebrities and all manor of people that live rarefied and privileged lives and are totally out of touch with the rest of society (as they almost never mix with working class people) . The British people also have a 6th sense for sniffing out extremists (and were continuously insulted and demonized by those people already mentioned).

Tories won because they were the only Brexit party and Boris appealed to people who still consider themselves patriotic (i.e. most)

Lib Fems failed because they sum up all that's wrong with the hyper liberal virtue signalling elite and equally out of touch as Labour.

Christ knows why the SNP did so well, I'm very disappointing in the jocks.

I would dissolve the union, as David Starkey pointed out recently it's been a case of 3 tails (Wales, Ireland and especially Scotland) wagging the dog for years as England is over 80% of the UK population and is the only country without it's own parliament yet is also the economic powerhouse. All of those countries are a drain on our economy and have far more socialist tendencies (although I have sympathy and solidarity with Irish unionists).

We need a revival of the English constitution with the concepts of individual rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of association etc at the forefront of our thinking and education. These are the fundamentals that were key to creating the entire western modern world.

Most of all though we probably need a new youth counter culture of free thinking, facts and realism as our youth is currently lost to ideology.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 16 Dec 19 10.57am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by W12

Labour lost because they have become a Marxist cult and are followed and represented by people of the "quality" of Owen Jones, David Lammmy, Ash Sarkar, numerous vacuous celebrities and all manor of people that live rarefied and privileged lives and are totally out of touch with the rest of society (as they almost never mix with working class people) . The British people also have a 6th sense for sniffing out extremists (and were continuously insulted and demonized by those people already mentioned).

Tories won because they were the only Brexit party and Boris appealed to people who still consider themselves patriotic (i.e. most)

Lib Fems failed because they sum up all that's wrong with the hyper liberal virtue signalling elite and equally out of touch as Labour.

Christ knows why the SNP did so well, I'm very disappointing in the jocks.

I would dissolve the union, as David Starkey pointed out recently it's been a case of 3 tails (Wales, Ireland and especially Scotland) wagging the dog for years as England is over 80% of the UK population and is the only country without it's own parliament yet is also the economic powerhouse. All of those countries are a drain on our economy and have far more socialist tendencies (although I have sympathy and solidarity with Irish unionists).

We need a revival of the English constitution with the concepts of individual rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of association etc at the forefront of our thinking and education. These are the fundamentals that were key to creating the entire western modern world.

Most of all though we probably need a new youth counter culture of free thinking, facts and realism as our youth is currently lost to ideology.

I wish you had stood for Parliament you get my vote

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 16 Dec 19 11.17am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by W12

I would dissolve the union, as David Starkey pointed out recently it's been a case of 3 tails (Wales, Ireland and especially Scotland) wagging the dog for years as England is over 80% of the UK population and is the only country without it's own parliament yet is also the economic powerhouse. All of those countries are a drain on our economy and have far more socialist tendencies (although I have sympathy and solidarity with Irish unionists).

We need a revival of the English constitution with the concepts of individual rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of association etc at the forefront of our thinking and education. These are the fundamentals that were key to creating the entire western modern world.

I get the arguments for English nationalism but I also don't really trust my instincts that are most fired up by it.

Always thought it was the Elephant in the room and the one that could cause the most potential, and unpredictable, damage. Because it has been subdued for so long that it has effectively been allowed to fester albeit in perhaps a way that is more sub-conscious than any clearly rationalised.

Never really bought into all this faux-patriotism that our Celtic neighbours like to onaistically indulge on with all their stupid skirts and ludicrous Guinness hats. I would hate for us English to go the same way but I suspect that English nationalism would burst out in a way that nobody could really foresee and might be a precursor to some real upheaval. It takes centuries before barbarism becomes diluted enough to make it a tourist attraction.

One of my big fears about Brexit not happening was that English nationalism would have then become the only conduit of protest for millions of people. That faith in the British Parliamentary system would have been so undermined that there could be no logical or reasoned argument to be made for acquiescing to the electoral process anymore. If our votes on June 23rd could be so easily discarded, why bother anymore?

Perhaps I am a little guilty of hyperbole over this and am transferring my own feelings of complete rage about anybody who wanted to nullify the result from June 2016 but I suspect not. Because our system of democracy would have been fatally undermined.

The reality is England tolerates the smaller parts of the UK. Accepts them as the price to be paid for our shared history. We all have friends and family and even origins from all parts of it. And to be fair, we are richer and enjoy a much higher quality of life (if Scotland leave then us remaining members of the UK live for years longer on average).

We even owe a duty of care to the Republic of Ireland because despite all their hot air, they need us to sell into. We have enough of a shared history to mean that they do need looking after.

As things stand I would urge people to curb their understandable desire for an England that stands solely on its own two feet. Let's get Brexit done and see how matters pan out.

Leave was a UK wide vote. And as such, we need to take a UK wide approach to how it is handled. We need to wipe our mouths and move on, no matter how justified our rage and anger is.

Edited by Matov (16 Dec 2019 11.20am)

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 16 Dec 19 11.18am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by W12

Labour lost because they have become a Marxist cult and are followed and represented by people of the "quality" of Owen Jones, David Lammmy, Ash Sarkar, numerous vacuous celebrities and all manor of people that live rarefied and privileged lives and are totally out of touch with the rest of society (as they almost never mix with working class people) . The British people also have a 6th sense for sniffing out extremists (and were continuously insulted and demonized by those people already mentioned).

Tories won because they were the only Brexit party and Boris appealed to people who still consider themselves patriotic (i.e. most)

Lib Fems failed because they sum up all that's wrong with the hyper liberal virtue signalling elite and equally out of touch as Labour.

Christ knows why the SNP did so well, I'm very disappointing in the jocks.

I would dissolve the union, as David Starkey pointed out recently it's been a case of 3 tails (Wales, Ireland and especially Scotland) wagging the dog for years as England is over 80% of the UK population and is the only country without it's own parliament yet is also the economic powerhouse. All of those countries are a drain on our economy and have far more socialist tendencies (although I have sympathy and solidarity with Irish unionists).

We need a revival of the English constitution with the concepts of individual rights, the rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of association etc at the forefront of our thinking and education. These are the fundamentals that were key to creating the entire western modern world.

Most of all though we probably need a new youth counter culture of free thinking, facts and realism as our youth is currently lost to ideology.

People who have only ever voted Labour voted Tory.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
silvertop Flag Portishead 16 Dec 19 11.34am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by becky

1. The majority of your fellow citizens obviously did want to exit - that's why Johnson won - and that was after seeing the implications for the last 3 and odd years!

2. That makes the assumption that there will still be an EU to rejoin by the time the mood in this country changes - I doubt that there will be, or at least, not in it's current form.


1. Not sure I agree with that Becky. The number of remain voters exceeded the number of leave voters. However, first past the post (check the comparative votes per seat ratio) and the spread of remain among more parties created the illusion of a mandate.

2. Here you may be right. Also, the mood will never shift to re-joining an EU that is in disintegration, so it would be a moot point. For my part I hope the EU stays strong as a civilised force against an over dominant USA and a frightening expansive Russia. Both countries will be loving what has happened here.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 16 of 36 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Who is to blame?