This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
The Holmesdale Fanatics thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 bexleydave  Barnehurst 31 Jul 18 8.27am |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by c_block_shedevil
Thank you for sharing. Interesting. It appears a lot of spin have been used by the club.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| westquay 58 miles from se25 31 Jul 18 8.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Simply....HF have made palace fans get their arses of and make noise, big noise..
"Numb,gutted and shocked . Three words that sum up how I feel." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| turbohorsebox Coulsdon 31 Jul 18 8.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by westquay
Simply....HF have made palace fans get their arses of and make noise, big noise.. lol
All good. Nothing bad. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| silvertop Portishead 31 Jul 18 9.31am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bexleydave
Quite. This is an entirely polarised view. For instance, where they say "incompetence" can we read: haven't agreed to all our demands?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Jul 18 9.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by c_block_shedevil
And according to the post above it looks like no one was being forced to move. The block would have been open to everyone. It's about creating new singing section, not about removing 100 for 100. Something needs to be done with block E regardless. Half the people want to stand and half want to sit. There are weekly arguments in that block which isn't good for anyone. What happens if people that don’t want to stand can’t be given 4 seats together in the same or near row further to the left because there aren’t any? And what happens if the whole of E standing means either part of F either want to stand or everyone has to stand because they can’t see, and then the same in G etc? This is unworkable until the new stand goes up or we’re relegated and I bet the hangers onto the HF disappear. Well they’re more likely to after 2-3 seasons. Edited by Rudi Hedman (31 Jul 2018 9.32am)
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| daven Hailsham 31 Jul 18 9.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
When did it become legal to stand anyway.People are talking on here like they have a right to stand.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 31 Jul 18 9.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by c_block_shedevil
I think it's hypocritical that people can defend their right to a plastic seat and refuse to think about the progression of the club yet the same people think it's ok to turf someone out of their HOME without a second thought.
A bit harsh, as far as I was aware they were compensated and the club agreed to find them alternative housing, which I suspect will be better than they have now. Wasn't it only 1 resident who objected?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 31 Jul 18 10.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
A bit harsh, as far as I was aware they were compensated and the club agreed to find them alternative housing, which I suspect will be better than they have now. Wasn't it only 1 resident who objected? And I think he’s a profiteering landlord. Son of Ron?
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 31 Jul 18 10.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
A bit harsh, as far as I was aware they were compensated and the club agreed to find them alternative housing, which I suspect will be better than they have now. Wasn't it only 1 resident who objected? I think it's quite a good analogy. A. For the good of the club, Palace want to move some people currently living in Wooderson Close. B. For the good of the club, Palace wanted to move some people currently sitting in block E every other week. Both A and B would be compensated and found alternate accommodation / seats. Most Palace fans think A is completely correct and justified and most seem to think B isn't. If you live in A or sit in B then you probably don't think that it's a good idea.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 31 Jul 18 10.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by topcat
I think it's quite a good analogy. A. For the good of the club, Palace want to move some people currently living in Wooderson Close. B. For the good of the club, Palace wanted to move some people currently sitting in block E every other week.
That's a shocking analogy as whilst A is for the good of the club B is only good for a small number of Palace fans
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bexleydave Barnehurst 31 Jul 18 10.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by topcat
I think it's quite a good analogy. A. For the good of the club, Palace want to move some people currently living in Wooderson Close. B. For the good of the club, Palace wanted to move some people currently sitting in block E every other week. Both A and B would be compensated and found alternate accommodation / seats. Most Palace fans think A is completely correct and justified and most seem to think B isn't. If you live in A or sit in B then you probably don't think that it's a good idea. The proposal wouldn't just have affected those who would have been required to give up their seats in Block B. It would have affected the whole of the Holmesdale Lower. Standing in Block B only works because it's off to the side and doesn't block much of the sightlines in other blocks. Standing at the front of Block E would mean everyone in Block E having to stand and that would have had a domino effect either side of it. It was ill-thought out and has quite rightly been binned.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bexleydave Barnehurst 31 Jul 18 10.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
That's a shocking analogy as whilst A is for the good of the club B is only good for a small number of Palace fans
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.