This is a very unfair criticism of the system which completely ignores the difficulties of this particular crime.

Most crimes involve proving that someone did a particular act or not. Prove they did it....guilty.

Rape requires more than this......Proving that A had sex with B does not make them guilty. To criticise this is problematical for justice.

It sounds like you want justice based upon percentages that you think should apply.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Not particularly, I just have empathy with women. I can imagine what it must be like as a man to be sexually violated, and that seems pretty horrible and humiliating.

The decision though is decided by the Family Court and a pragmatic reality of where families break up; which involves both individual parents. Separation from children is unavoidable in such a case, and the most common outcome is joint custody agreements. Incidents where people are granted no custody are rare, and usually on the basis of evidence of serious risk or a history of risk to the children. Even in those cases, most will allow for supervised contact orders (which are a pre-requisite to earning increased contact).

I'm curious, what should happen to kids when their parents split up? Those kids aren't being taken away - a decision has to be made, and when the parents can't do that, then the Family Court and Social services have to.

I also know several fathers who have primary custody - its increasingly common these days.

If your kids are taken away from you, by social services or you're denied any custody or contact, chances are that both social services, and the court agree, that you're a risk to the children.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

I'm not debating the merits of the legal system when dealing with divorce, I'm suggesting that there are examples where men might have a good reason to hate women.
All over the world there are cultures where women are treated as second class. In Britain, we are ahead of most in achieving equality. Sadly we are importing cultures that are backward in that respect.
However, with equality comes equal responsibility and equal consideration.

Not unreasonable. There was a recent miscarriage of justice narrowly avoided due to text messages sent by the accuser to her friends.

Its not actually all that unreasonable to obtain some reasonable proof of consent, like a video or text message.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

This ones tough, these are my first thoughts on it...

He has grounds to sue the ivf people
The things he is claiming for a nonscence
She has commited fraud
What she did was wrong law or not
He is doing this several years later so he is doing it 100 percent for the money
He has every right to be angry over this

Those are just my gut reactions but every situation here is tricky. Everyone has let that poor lad down and he is in a horrible situation but the court case is completely about the money...

We all know there are bunny boilers out there but, of course, there are also violent misogynists too.

Don't think one gender can claim the moral high ground when violators, bullies, abusers and downright liars can be of either.

But, generally, men are more violent than women so it stands to reason that within a domestic scenario the victim is more likely to be female.

One woman in four experiences domestic violence in her lifetime
Office for National Statistics (2016) Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences, 2014/15

In the year ending March 2016, 1.2 million women reported experiences of domestic abuse in England and Wales
Office for National Statistics (2016) Domestic Abuse in England and Wales: year ending March 2016

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]