This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
serial thriller The Promised Land 27 Jul 15 2.40pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Jul 2015 2.02am
Quote serial thriller at 27 Jul 2015 1.30am
As for your last comment Hoof, we have funded despotic regimes which have tyrannised the area, produced bombs that have rained down on their villages and communities while continuing to turn a blind eye as oil and mining corporations pollute the environment. How can you possibly argue that we don't owe these people anything? Surprise me one time and show me you have a heart. What's all this 'we' stuff......I wasn't aware that I, hoof or anyone else had done awful things to people. What you are talking about ended here nearly two hundred years ago. What you are talking about was carried by a vast minority compared to the actual population in Britain....Wealthy landowners. The vast majority of British people had absolutely nothing to do with the slave trade.....No slaves, no income from slaves. At what stage exactly shall we disassociate ourselves from the evils that men do? Shall Germans who weren't Nazis carry the guilt for acts they didn't take part in?.....Or should I feel guilt because I share the same skin colour as rich land owners based in Bristol from at least 180 years ago. This kind of fuzzy guilt is just completely unfair when applied to the general masses.
'We' continue to sell arms, equipment and machinery to the Ethiopian government who are waging a war with Eritrea that's causing thousands to flee the country. 'We' continue to support regimes such as the Saudis, who continue to behead people at a faster rate than IS. We continue to do trade deals with countries like Kuwait and Qatar, despite atrocious human rights records. 'We' continue to think that bombing civilian areas in Syria and Iraq is a legitimate means of achieving peace and stability in the region. 'We' continue to flood the continent with arms that have been proven to fall in to the hands of IS, pirates in Somalia and several other war zones. And yet it is also us who refuse to take responsibility for the consequences of our actions, allowing thousands to drown in the Mediterranean, thousands more to attempt life-risking journeys across the channel without providing assistance, instead taking in less asylum seekers than Germany, France, Italy or even Sweden. Now what I'm sure you'll read in to this post, Stirling, is that I blame all the world's ills on our foreign policy. I don't. Global issues are incredibly complex and involve multiple causes, but to claim that we play no part in these is equally absurd, when the bombs and weapons in many parts of these areas bear British manufacturing information. What I believe is that the brave, empathetic response would be to help other people in desperate need, and I think it is morally incumbent on us to do so considering the role we've played in these cases. Instead we continue to attempt to find further and further logistical reasons as to why we should turn a blind eye, despite the fact that there is more than enough brown belt land to build on which will house not only the asylum seekers in Calais, but our own homeless and thousands more. It is collective responsibility for us to not turn a blind eye, to help those in need and to show a bit of British courage and togetherness, that's why 'we' have to take responsibility.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 27 Jul 15 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnfirewall at 27 Jul 2015 2.33pm
You're not expecting to elicit any agreement on the vile nationalistic notion that we should look after 'our own' are you? We all know our poor are only the victims when the rich are the perpetrators.
No, I don't agree with that. The whole concept that looking after your own is wrong is well......Ok mate.....What did your mother do with you?.....Why didn't she take in the poorer kid down the street and share bedrooms? The concept is the same and it's ridiculous in my view.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Jul 15 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Jul 2015 2.36pm
Quote npn at 27 Jul 2015 2.28pm
Up to date figures would be good, but 30% less than Germany. Of course there are others doing far less.
Yeah but that works both ways, France, Norway, Sweeden etc have a smaller population (and the last two much greater restrictions in terms of infrastructure on location for housing).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 27 Jul 15 2.42pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 27 Jul 2015 1.15pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 27 Jul 2015 12.35pm
Edited by leggedstruggle (27 Jul 2015 12.36pm)
1. greater access to education 2.improved adult literacy. 3.reduction in child mortality. 4. greater access to employment beyond the menial.
The Archbishop of Zimbabwe Pius Ncube has said, "We had the best education in Africa and now our schools are closing". According to the World Health Organisation, life expectancy at birth for Zimbabwean men is 37 years and is 34 years for women, the lowest such figures for any nation. 80% of people in Zimbabwe do not have what could be described as a real job. But of course you on the left are blind to these facts because Mugabe is black, and an 'anti-imperialist'. Your usual double standards apply.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 27 Jul 15 2.42pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jul 2015 2.41pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Jul 2015 2.36pm
Quote npn at 27 Jul 2015 2.28pm
Up to date figures would be good, but 30% less than Germany. Of course there are others doing far less.
Yeah but that works both ways, France, Norway, Sweeden etc have a smaller population (and the last two much greater restrictions in terms of infrastructure on location for housing).
Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Jul 2015 2.43pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 27 Jul 15 2.44pm | |
---|---|
Quote npn at 27 Jul 2015 2.28pm
Quote johnfirewall at 27 Jul 2015 2.18pm
Can I get some figures which would indicate we're not doing our bit? Of course having annual migration equating to an extra half percent of the population is minute compared to the several hundred percent of Lampedusa, but reverting to the crude reference of the country being 'full' France should be keeping them. Let's look at why people wish to come here. Some say it's the mark of a civilised society but I doubt even the left are going with that one anymore, and no one is going to be the envy of their neighbours by housing a migrant, not even in Brighton. Only from Wiki, and before the current influx started in earnest, but: Country Total Per 100 000 inhabitants Up to date figures would be good, but 30% less than Germany. Of course there are others doing far less. The point is, the burden should be evenly shared across all member states, as unpalatable as that may be. If the others are also forced to take their share, who knows, maybe net immigration would actually go down? About right if you look at GDP and size but looking at those shocking figures at the bottom end we should be paying France to move their migrant camps to the south.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Jul 15 2.45pm | |
---|---|
Quote johnfirewall at 27 Jul 2015 2.33pm
swiveling. In polite response to this.....No thanks. You're not expecting to elicit any agreement on the vile nationalistic notion that we should look after 'our own' are you? We all know our poor are only the victims when the rich are the perpetrators. A false argument, because the UK, wouldn't look after its own more, even if every migrant magically vanished over night. People tend to romanticize the past, but in the 70s, 80s and early 90s, when immigration was much lower, we were no more looking after our own than we are now. Its just a convenience where immigrants get the blame. After all, Governments don't want to admit that all those tax cuts in the 80s, paid for by NHS cuts in mental health via the care in the community act resulted in a massive spike in homelessnes
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
fed up eagle Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 27 Jul 15 2.47pm | |
---|---|
The reason that everyone wants to come here is that they know we have a generous benefits system, lax borders that you could drive a bulldozer through un-noticed and soft politicians who are scared of their own shadow and are petrified of being branded racist. Some people are so ashamed of our illustrious past that they denounce everything that is great about Britain and are hell bent on changing the social make up of this country. These politicians are usually the left leaning kind.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 27 Jul 15 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Jul 2015 2.41pm
Quote johnfirewall at 27 Jul 2015 2.33pm
You're not expecting to elicit any agreement on the vile nationalistic notion that we should look after 'our own' are you? We all know our poor are only the victims when the rich are the perpetrators.
No, I don't agree with that. The whole concept that looking after your own is wrong is well......Ok mate.....What did your mother do with you?.....Why didn't she take in the poorer kid down the street and share bedrooms? The concept is the same and it's ridiculous in my view.
You do get some kind souls who do that, for 500 quid a week. Edited by johnfirewall (27 Jul 2015 2.48pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
leggedstruggle Croydon 27 Jul 15 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 27 Jul 2015 2.35pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 27 Jul 2015 11.35am
What happens is that they kill and maim each other and end up under the control of evil dictators like Mugabe.
Nicola Sturgeon in Scotland.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Jul 15 2.47pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Jul 2015 2.42pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jul 2015 2.41pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 27 Jul 2015 2.36pm
Quote npn at 27 Jul 2015 2.28pm
Up to date figures would be good, but 30% less than Germany. Of course there are others doing far less.
Yeah but that works both ways, France, Norway, Sweeden etc have a smaller population (and the last two much greater restrictions in terms of infrastructure on location for housing).
Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Jul 2015 2.43pm) They should, after all you don't want convicted rapists, murderers etc. Of course we should maybe have actually invested properly in assuring that, rather than simply ignored a massive problem for 20 years because it would cost.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 27 Jul 15 2.51pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 27 Jul 2015 2.45pm
We all know our poor are only the victims when the rich are the perpetrators. A false argument, because the UK, wouldn't look after its own more, even if every migrant magically vanished over night. People tend to romanticize the past, but in the 70s, 80s and early 90s, when immigration was much lower, we were no more looking after our own than we are now. Its just a convenience where immigrants get the blame. After all, Governments don't want to admit that all those tax cuts in the 80s, paid for by NHS cuts in mental health via the care in the community act resulted in a massive spike in homelessnes Those previous poor had far better access to social housing. Those previous poor had less competition to jobs. It's not about the rich making it easier previously.....It's about the size of the housing and job pot and the number of people taking from it. I don't blame an immigrant for wanting to improve their life.....But I do blame government decisions that.....in the end reduce the life chances of those here.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.