You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Look what you've done!
November 23 2024 12.42pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Look what you've done!

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 16 of 28 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jul 15 4.15pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)

I just said that there is a difference between saying something as a personal opinion, and acting on an expressed view. If you don't think there is a difference between someone saying 'I don't like black people' and telling someone directly, to their face, to 'go back home' or calling them a black c**t then you're right.

If however, you do see a difference between an idea or belief, and 'attacking' people on the basis of that idea of belief, verbally or physically then I'm right.

I don't have a problem with people who express unpopular, horrible or even criminal views. Its when they act on them.

Also, as the so called 'Thought Police' aren't actually murdering people for what they believe in private, its a hyperbole.

 

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 22 Jul 15 4.16pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

That I do agree with. The 'enemy' is clearly defined and it doesn't need all-encompassing draconian measures to combat it.

 

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jul 15 4.19pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

Not a chance that will ever be the outcome though. It'd never get past the house of lords, and the judiciary would simply refuse to convict cases as they'd be I) against UK legal prescident and II) Inviolation of the Human Rights act, which Cameron has already backtracked on withdrawing.

Until you see the definition of what constitutes 'extremism' its impossible to say what the intent of the powers will be, or even if they're needed anyhow (given the rather broad power of anti-terrorist legislation).


 

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 22 Jul 15 4.23pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 22 Jul 2015 4.16pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

That I do agree with. The 'enemy' is clearly defined and it doesn't need all-encompassing draconian measures to combat it.

I quite like the idea suggested that people wishing to join IS or travel to territory occupied by IS be allowed to voluntarily surrender their passport/citizenship and freely leave the UK to do so.

 

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 22 Jul 15 4.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

But of course you are in favour of mighty sledgehammers when it comes to so called racially aggravated 'crimes' and hounding bakers who disapprove of same sex marriage and other 'nuts'.

 

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 22 Jul 15 4.36pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Jul 2015 4.19pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

Not a chance that will ever be the outcome though. It'd never get past the house of lords, and the judiciary would simply refuse to convict cases as they'd be I) against UK legal prescident and II) Inviolation of the Human Rights act, which Cameron has already backtracked on withdrawing.

Until you see the definition of what constitutes 'extremism' its impossible to say what the intent of the powers will be, or even if they're needed anyhow (given the rather broad power of anti-terrorist legislation).


Love it that you are relying on the unelected House of Lords to ensure that Islamic State remain free to advocate real racially, religiously and homophobic crimes.

 

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 22 Jul 15 4.38pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Jul 2015 4.15pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)

I just said that there is a difference between saying something as a personal opinion, and acting on an expressed view. If you don't think there is a difference between someone saying 'I don't like black people' and telling someone directly, to their face, to 'go back home' or calling them a black c**t then you're right.

If however, you do see a difference between an idea or belief, and 'attacking' people on the basis of that idea of belief, verbally or physically then I'm right.

I don't have a problem with people who express unpopular, horrible or even criminal views. Its when they act on them.

Also, as the so called 'Thought Police' aren't actually murdering people for what they believe in private, its a hyperbole.

I don't see how telling someone to go home is attacking them. I've had pub landlords tell me to go home; they weren't arrested and handcuffed - mind you I think they were under 85 years of age.

 

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 4.41pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 4.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

But of course you are in favour of mighty sledgehammers when it comes to so called racially aggravated 'crimes' and hounding bakers who disapprove of same sex marriage and other 'nuts'.

You are obsessed by gay cake as well. Do you roll a dice to choose which deflecting argument you will use next.
Roll a 1. Defend 85 yr old who shouts racist comment. Roll a 2. Moan that it's not fair that calling someone a black c*** is castigated by society at large.
Roll a 3. Mention the phrase Socialist paradise
Roll 4: mention pol pot and or stalin.
Roll 5: mention gay cake gate.
Roll 6: Say lefties defend IS

Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 4.42pm)

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Superfly Flag The sun always shines in Catford 22 Jul 15 4.44pm Send a Private Message to Superfly Add Superfly as a friend

Mods - Why do we let a bloke who has been red carded 3 times already to turn every thread into his political agenda?

 

Lend me a Tenor

31 May to 3 June 2017

John McIntosh Arts Centre
London Oratory School
SW6 1RX

with Superfly in the chorus
[Link]
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 22 Jul 15 5.09pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Quote Superfly at 22 Jul 2015 4.44pm

Mods - Why do we let a bloke who has been red carded 3 times already to turn every thread into his political agenda?


The Mods are busy initiating the new recruits in the time honoured fashion while HOL Towers is closed for its annual de-greasing.

 

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 22 Jul 15 5.15pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.41pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 4.34pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 4.05pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.59pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.50pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 3.42pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 3.24pm

Legged. I take it that you think it's OK for people to call others a black c***.

Speaks volumes I'm afraid.

I don't think you should call anyone a c**t. Whether you use the word black as well, or fat, or bald etc, I don't think it matters much - certainly does not warrant a criminal prosecution. By the way, have there been any prosecutions of black people for calling white people 'white c****s? Your selective outrage at the use of the word black of course speaks volumes too.

I'm not taking a stance. Just presenting what are Societal norms.


You brought up the Terry issue in a thread about Tory policies. Why are you doing this? Either agree with it or not.
You brought the word black into the conversation, waited for someone to counter your argument that it's OK for a high profile footballer to use racist language to accuse them of selective outrage.

Poor trolling. Must try harder.

My contributions were in answer to your own posting of a link about 'thought crimes', contrasting the left's support of the right of Islamic State supporters to have freedom of speech, but the likes of Terry not to. Terry was found not guilty of using racist language by a proper court. The politically correct FA punished him for political reasons. Is it a 'societal norm' to allow Islamic State supporters to spread their poison unhindered?


Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 4.00pm)


No its not. But Camerons plans that he outlined go way beyond ISIS and include anyone who dares to criticise the government. Sledgehammer to crack a nut.

But of course you are in favour of mighty sledgehammers when it comes to so called racially aggravated 'crimes' and hounding bakers who disapprove of same sex marriage and other 'nuts'.

You are obsessed by gay cake as well. Do you roll a dice to choose which deflecting argument you will use next.
Roll a 1. Defend 85 yr old who shouts racist comment. Roll a 2. Moan that it's not fair that calling someone a black c*** is castigated by society at large.
Roll a 3. Mention the phrase Socialist paradise
Roll 4: mention pol pot and or stalin.
Roll 5: mention gay cake gate.
Roll 6: Say lefties defend IS

Edited by nickgusset (22 Jul 2015 4.42pm)

Merely highlighting the double standards of people with your outlook Nick.

 

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 16 of 28 < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Look what you've done!