This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
The White Horse 14 Apr 15 9.46pm | |
---|---|
Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
That wasn't my point, though. My point was that some things are better (eg, health, technology) and some things are worse (eg, chance of getting a well-paid manufacturing job without any A-levels). Any generation needs to take the rough with the smooth. And especially "YOUNG PEOPLE" (god I hate the way this term is bandied about in the media) should be in the best position to make the most of things. Why should they be in the best position to make the most of things? Presumably you'd accept that in our society, money is heavily linked with power. Emphatically, young people have substantially lower incomes and wealth than people who have been in the workplace for decades, so they're far more susceptible to "cost of living" issues. I'm not saying their being paid less is a bad thing, obviously they are less productive as they're inexperienced, but they are less well off. It's easy to say that because they're young, young people have "more potential" and have various options in terms of what they do with their lives, but if personal economic strength is linked to personal freedom, young people will be less "free" in the respect that they're less likely to be able to buy opportunities as others can. Obviously being able to work unpaid is a classic example. To take an example from my own life, I was a special constable for the Met for a few months (volunteering 8 hours a fortnight). I was only able to afford to do this because I'd earned a fair amount before, had savings and was working a 4 day week at points. The vast majority of people younger than me at the time would not have been able to do this. And since it's the main route into a career in the Met, many potentially good coppers never become one. Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
I guess this is where we perhaps differ politically. I think it's down to the individual to take their opportunities where they find them. I don't think many people (even nickgusset) would disagree with that. Opportunity taking, at the micro level, is obviously good. But if at the macro level there seem to be fewer (or worse) opportunities, that's got to be an issue surely? Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
You (presumably) think that "opportunities" are only there if "society" (ie, the state) provides them. I'm honestly not bothered who provides the opportunities, I just think it's a monumental political failure if the advances largely outside of political control (health, technology, etc.) are outweighed by the negatives within political control (education, transport etc.) to such an extent that there's even a debate possible about which generation is the more fortunate. It should just be established that time leads to inevitable progress that raises living standards. In Japan, for example, I understand that inequality is lower than many places not because of government intervention, but just because the socio-economic structures don't really lend themselves so easily to economic disparity. For me, whether people are better or worse off in Japan because of government intervention is far less relavent than whether they are compared to previous generations. Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
I think this excessively focuses on the negatives. It also encapsulates exactly what annoys me about the "debate" we (as in society) are having about this issue. Education was not just free but a lot BETTER in the past *cough* Antony Crosland *cough*. Houses were cheaper. Manual jobs were better paid. I'll give you all that. But -- and I return to my original point -- other things are a lot better. Healthcare. Laptops. Smartphones. The internet. International travel opportunities. Not growing up - like my mum - with bed bugs, an outdoor toilet and a Polish lodger sleeping in the hallway. I sort of share your annoyance at the "why won't they just think of the children" emotive sh*t, but I'd say the "next generation" not being better off despite all of the positives above is a farce and therefore noteworthy. Much like foodbanks in 21st century Britain are. Just reeks of totally inept management of a good situation. Returning to your steak vs baked beans analogy, I'd say politicians have been given a nice steak and have grilled the f*ck out of it so much nobody even recognises it as a steak anymore.
"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnno42000 16 Apr 15 8.26pm | |
---|---|
Just watching the BBC election debate and think Ed may have the hots for Leanne (as I do )
'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Harry Beever Newbury 16 Apr 15 9.28pm | |
---|---|
If anyone's recorded it I'll save you the bother of watching and give you a synopsis. They're all full of s***.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
imbored UK 16 Apr 15 10.28pm | |
---|---|
Nigel laying into the audience. A real vote winner that.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 16 Apr 15 10.37pm | |
---|---|
How many times did Miliband say "Working people" ? or "The working people of this country". Indeed a LOT are working under the Conservative led Government. Some £31 Mill in work, nearly 2 Million jobs created since 2010, approx 5.5% expected unemployment rate this year, nearly half the eurozone's average.1000 jobs created every day. That's enough from my "Soapbox" and "Question Time" is coming up ! Anyway, I am exceedingly busy between now and Election Day campaigning on behalf of my beloved Conservatives so I will hardly have any time at all to debate on HOL !!!! "Thank Goodness" I hear from the multitudes !!!! Take care one and all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
imbored UK 16 Apr 15 10.47pm | |
---|---|
Quote Willo at 16 Apr 2015 10.37pm
How many times did Miliband say "Working people" ? or "The working people of this country". Indeed a LOT are working under the Conservative led Government. Some £31 Mill in work, nearly 2 Million jobs created since 2010, approx 5.5% expected unemployment rate this year, nearly half the eurozone's average.1000 jobs created every day. That's enough from my "Soapbox" and "Question Time" is coming up ! Anyway, I am exceedingly busy between now and Election Day campaigning on behalf of my beloved Conservatives so I will hardly have any time at all to debate on HOL !!!! "Thank Goodness" I hear from the multitudes !!!! Take care one and all.
Happy canvassing!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Apr 15 11.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote Willo at 16 Apr 2015 10.37pm
How many times did Miliband say "Working people" ? or "The working people of this country". Indeed a LOT are working under the Conservative led Government. Some £31 Mill in work, nearly 2 Million jobs created since 2010, approx 5.5% expected unemployment rate this year, nearly half the eurozone's average.1000 jobs created every day. That's enough from my "Soapbox" and "Question Time" is coming up ! Anyway, I am exceedingly busy between now and Election Day campaigning on behalf of my beloved Conservatives so I will hardly have any time at all to debate on HOL !!!! "Thank Goodness" I hear from the multitudes !!!! Take care one and all.
Not hard working families? I felt left out because Milliband didn't keep referring to 'the people at home'
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Johnny Eagles berlin 17 Apr 15 8.49am | |
---|---|
Quote The White Horse at 14 Apr 2015 9.46pm
Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
That wasn't my point, though. My point was that some things are better (eg, health, technology) and some things are worse (eg, chance of getting a well-paid manufacturing job without any A-levels). Any generation needs to take the rough with the smooth. And especially "YOUNG PEOPLE" (god I hate the way this term is bandied about in the media) should be in the best position to make the most of things. Why should they be in the best position to make the most of things? Presumably you'd accept that in our society, money is heavily linked with power. Emphatically, young people have substantially lower incomes and wealth than people who have been in the workplace for decades, so they're far more susceptible to "cost of living" issues. I'm not saying their being paid less is a bad thing, obviously they are less productive as they're inexperienced, but they are less well off. It's easy to say that because they're young, young people have "more potential" and have various options in terms of what they do with their lives, but if personal economic strength is linked to personal freedom, young people will be less "free" in the respect that they're less likely to be able to buy opportunities as others can. Obviously being able to work unpaid is a classic example. To take an example from my own life, I was a special constable for the Met for a few months (volunteering 8 hours a fortnight). I was only able to afford to do this because I'd earned a fair amount before, had savings and was working a 4 day week at points. The vast majority of people younger than me at the time would not have been able to do this. And since it's the main route into a career in the Met, many potentially good coppers never become one. Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
I guess this is where we perhaps differ politically. I think it's down to the individual to take their opportunities where they find them. I don't think many people (even nickgusset) would disagree with that. Opportunity taking, at the micro level, is obviously good. But if at the macro level there seem to be fewer (or worse) opportunities, that's got to be an issue surely? Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
You (presumably) think that "opportunities" are only there if "society" (ie, the state) provides them. I'm honestly not bothered who provides the opportunities, I just think it's a monumental political failure if the advances largely outside of political control (health, technology, etc.) are outweighed by the negatives within political control (education, transport etc.) to such an extent that there's even a debate possible about which generation is the more fortunate. It should just be established that time leads to inevitable progress that raises living standards. In Japan, for example, I understand that inequality is lower than many places not because of government intervention, but just because the socio-economic structures don't really lend themselves so easily to economic disparity. For me, whether people are better or worse off in Japan because of government intervention is far less relavent than whether they are compared to previous generations. Quote Johnny Eagles at 08 Apr 2015 11.43am
I think this excessively focuses on the negatives. It also encapsulates exactly what annoys me about the "debate" we (as in society) are having about this issue. Education was not just free but a lot BETTER in the past *cough* Antony Crosland *cough*. Houses were cheaper. Manual jobs were better paid. I'll give you all that. But -- and I return to my original point -- other things are a lot better. Healthcare. Laptops. Smartphones. The internet. International travel opportunities. Not growing up - like my mum - with bed bugs, an outdoor toilet and a Polish lodger sleeping in the hallway. I sort of share your annoyance at the "why won't they just think of the children" emotive sh*t, but I'd say the "next generation" not being better off despite all of the positives above is a farce and therefore noteworthy. Much like foodbanks in 21st century Britain are. Just reeks of totally inept management of a good situation. Returning to your steak vs baked beans analogy, I'd say politicians have been given a nice steak and have grilled the f*ck out of it so much nobody even recognises it as a steak anymore. Can't really think of much to add. I agree broadly with you. The intergenerational thing IS an issue, I grant you, and a political one at that. I just think that if I was a politician, of all the hard-done-by moaners with a sense of grievance I had to listen to every day, the YOUNG PEOPLE who moan about not being able to buy a house or having to pay for their degrees pretty would be pretty low down the list of priorities.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Johnny Eagles berlin 17 Apr 15 9.03am | |
---|---|
Quote Willo at 16 Apr 2015 10.37pm
How many times did Miliband say "Working people" ? or "The working people of this country". Indeed a LOT are working under the Conservative led Government. Some £31 Mill in work, nearly 2 Million jobs created since 2010, approx 5.5% expected unemployment rate this year, nearly half the eurozone's average.1000 jobs created every day. That's enough from my "Soapbox" and "Question Time" is coming up ! Anyway, I am exceedingly busy between now and Election Day campaigning on behalf of my beloved Conservatives so I will hardly have any time at all to debate on HOL !!!! "Thank Goodness" I hear from the multitudes !!!! Take care one and all.
Why do you love the Conservatives, Willo? Genuine question.
...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Sash Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 17 Apr 15 9.17am | |
---|---|
I caught two minutes of this last night and that was enough..Farage talking about a European Super Army (WTF!!!) and Milliband, obviously at the instruction of his PR machine trying to smile and be relaxed leaning on his podium thing - he reminded me of an American game show host. In that two minutes it was all TV puff and bollocks. Awful - the level of political debate in this country is pitiful and now is more Weakest Link than anything Edited by The Sash (17 Apr 2015 9.18am)
As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 17 Apr 15 9.49am | |
---|---|
What an embarrasment last night's charade was. The BBC made it as left wing as was humanly possible. Labour, SNP, Plaid Cymru and Greens all trotting out the 'get the Tories out' line and asked questions from a specially selected audience, probably Guardian readers. We should all be embarrased, this is a general election debate where impartiality should be key and this is a public service broadcaster.
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
OknotOK Cockfosters, London 17 Apr 15 11.15am | |
---|---|
Quote Pussay Patrol at 17 Apr 2015 9.49am
What an embarrasment last night's charade was. The BBC made it as left wing as was humanly possible. Labour, SNP, Plaid Cymru and Greens all trotting out the 'get the Tories out' line and asked questions from a specially selected audience, probably Guardian readers. We should all be embarrased, this is a general election debate where impartiality should be key and this is a public service broadcaster. To be fair UKIP have confirmed they are not making any complaint about the makeup of the audience - aside from Farage's comments - and the BBC pointed out they did not select the audience. But even if they had, given the majority of the panel were left-wing it probably made more sense to have a left-wing audience. That is the voters those parties are trying to appeal to? Given the nature of the panel Miliband did really well. He was always going to be attacked as both the establishment candidate and as being too right wing or too left wing from the fringe parties. He handled himself well. The Labour party will be very happy today. Edited by OknotOK (17 Apr 2015 11.22am)
"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.