This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
crystal-purley Purley 23 Jan 14 9.02pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hambo at 23 Jan 2014 1.15pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 10.03am
Quote beagle at 23 Jan 2014 9.48am
Interesting one From the BBS 'questions to the board' forum - they (CpFC2010) were asked about teams around us strengthening. Here's the response: If we are sitting around watching other teams buy players who are no better than what we have already for £5m transfer fees on £2m a year wages on 4 year contracts then that doesnt bother me. We will always put sound business practice and the long term security of CPFC ahead of panic purchases. We will strengthen the squad but we will not be ripped off. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm quite happy with that attitude. So we can deduce from that they think Cameron Jerome is the equal of Long or Jelavic. I see. Honestly, no. If that is what they think then my comment about the board needing to stay out of football matters is bang on. And no, I'm not happy with an attitude that will get us relegated.
So putting Jelavic and Long to one side (for the record I think you have to conisder if either would be effective in the role we have for them rather than focus solely on whether they are "better" than what we have) would people advocate paying a Championship centre-back, already overpaid at Blackburn on £32,000 per week, £50k per week as well as the £5million - £6million fee being demanded? Given that the board know the difference in revenue between the divisions better than anyone yet are still of a view they won't be held to ransom by perceived desperation to remain in the PL, is it really an attitude you are comfortable condemning? Similarly are people not being more than a little selective with their memories? It's still relevant how far we've had to come and how close we came to not existing, no matter how tired people are of hearing it.
Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course). |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesmad Tonbridge with all the other mad c... 23 Jan 14 9.03pm | |
---|---|
Last day of window will see 3/4 players come in saved on a months wages ? Could this be the reason nothing done yet ??????
and now Fred Davis will try for the pink, for those watching in black n white its just behind the green.......... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kennybrowns leftfoot Reigate 23 Jan 14 9.09pm | |
---|---|
Quote matthau at 23 Jan 2014 6.11pm
Wheres paul stewart when you need him eh Still trying to find a hairdressers that specialises in Mens perms I reckon...... A very difficult thing to find in the 21st century!!
Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 23 Jan 14 9.13pm | |
---|---|
Quote kennybrowns leftfoot at 23 Jan 2014 9.09pm
Quote matthau at 23 Jan 2014 6.11pm
Wheres paul stewart when you need him eh Still trying to find a hairdressers that specialises in Mens perms I reckon...... A very difficult thing to find in the 21st century!!
Edited by sydtheeagle (23 Jan 2014 9.13pm)
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
crystal-purley Purley 23 Jan 14 9.13pm | |
---|---|
I think we are waiting to do all of our deals on the last day and hopefully break our own record of 11 in one day.
Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course). |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 23 Jan 14 9.15pm | |
---|---|
Quote crystal-purley at 23 Jan 2014 9.13pm
I think we are waiting to do all of our deals on the last day and hopefully break our own record of 11 in one day. This time we'll probably get Jerome K. Jerome cos the board will think it's a BOGOF deal that represents a wage savings :-)
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kennybrowns leftfoot Reigate 23 Jan 14 9.17pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 9.13pm
Quote kennybrowns leftfoot at 23 Jan 2014 9.09pm
Quote matthau at 23 Jan 2014 6.11pm
Wheres paul stewart when you need him eh Still trying to find a hairdressers that specialises in Mens perms I reckon...... A very difficult thing to find in the 21st century!!
Edited by sydtheeagle (23 Jan 2014 9.13pm) Agree with you on both points!! Yep Kenny Brown will also go down in my opinion as one of our best ever loans. In the 7 or 8 games he played as a left back he had a knack of scoring some thunderous goals with that left foot of his. Two of them were against Millwall and Charlton so he endeared himself to the Palace fans straight away!
Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
est1905 23 Jan 14 9.21pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 8.12pm
Quote est1905 at 23 Jan 2014 5.34pm
I'm not complaining about that but lets not all start pretending it was all down to business acumen! Absolutely correct. I'm sure that our current owners are astute businessmen in so far as you don't achieve success or amass a fortune (either/or) as they have without a degree of astuteness, but they haven't particularly shown it, or needed to show it, at Palace. On the playing side, hiring a manager with a reputation for enjoying a heavy night out wasn't particularly astute. Replacing him with a home grown novice was either astute or lucky or a bit of both. Losing that novice when he turned out to be highly capable certainly wasn't astute, and getting promoted given our form after he'd left was far more luck than judgment. Losing the replacement manager in less than a year was many things and astute wasn't one of them. Taking four weeks to replace him was a mixed bag; the final choice of replacement was astute; had we persuaded him to come four weeks earlier, we might be in the top 10 by now. On the playing side, the Zaha sale was luck more than judgment (the current owners merely cashed in on him; they didn't develop him) though you could argue they were astute to sell when his value was high. In terms of incoming players they've brought in a mixed bag. Not much astute business there, though. On the non-playing side they've done what's required to bring the ground up to Premiership requirements; they had no choice but to do that so it's not astute. I believe some improvements have been made to facilities generally and if so, that would be a sensible step. But it's not astute as it so obviously needed doing that only a fool would not have done so. All in all, our owners have done a good, professional, competent job off the pitch. Astuteness not really required; an idiot can tell most of our facilities are paleolithic and that negatively impacts prospective revenue. They've actually done an average to poor job with managers but they've had real rub of the green and the team has punched above its weight, good fortune they've benefitted from too. We have decent owners who support the club, work hard, and have their hearts in the right place. They're far more good than bad and many clubs have a lot worse, But heroes, Gods, perfect, or deserving of unquestioned praise? Not for me.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
crystal-purley Purley 23 Jan 14 9.27pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 9.15pm
Quote crystal-purley at 23 Jan 2014 9.13pm
I think we are waiting to do all of our deals on the last day and hopefully break our own record of 11 in one day. This time we'll probably get Jerome K. Jerome cos the board will think it's a BOGOF deal that represents a wage savings :-)
For those with longer memories there was also an England chant that went One Gary Stevens there's only two Gary Stevens
Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course). |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hambo Crawley 23 Jan 14 9.33pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 8.12pm
Quote est1905 at 23 Jan 2014 5.34pm
I'm not complaining about that but lets not all start pretending it was all down to business acumen! Absolutely correct. I'm sure that our current owners are astute businessmen in so far as you don't achieve success or amass a fortune (either/or) as they have without a degree of astuteness, but they haven't particularly shown it, or needed to show it, at Palace. On the playing side, hiring a manager with a reputation for enjoying a heavy night out wasn't particularly astute. Replacing him with a home grown novice was either astute or lucky or a bit of both. Losing that novice when he turned out to be highly capable certainly wasn't astute, and getting promoted given our form after he'd left was far more luck than judgment. Losing the replacement manager in less than a year was many things and astute wasn't one of them. Taking four weeks to replace him was a mixed bag; the final choice of replacement was astute; had we persuaded him to come four weeks earlier, we might be in the top 10 by now. On the playing side, the Zaha sale was luck more than judgment (the current owners merely cashed in on him; they didn't develop him) though you could argue they were astute to sell when his value was high. In terms of incoming players they've brought in a mixed bag. Not much astute business there, though. On the non-playing side they've done what's required to bring the ground up to Premiership requirements; they had no choice but to do that so it's not astute. I believe some improvements have been made to facilities generally and if so, that would be a sensible step. But it's not astute as it so obviously needed doing that only a fool would not have done so. All in all, our owners have done a good, professional, competent job off the pitch. Astuteness not really required; an idiot can tell most of our facilities are paleolithic and that negatively impacts prospective revenue. They've actually done an average to poor job with managers but they've had real rub of the green and the team has punched above its weight, good fortune they've benefitted from too. We have decent owners who support the club, work hard, and have their hearts in the right place. They're far more good than bad and many clubs have a lot worse, But heroes, Gods, perfect, or deserving of unquestioned praise? Not for me. Excellent post - and Steve P has said on a number of occasions that he finds constructive criticism/discussion useful, as you would expect. I think this thread has, in the main, been understood as a discussion, which is refreshing by recent standards. Too often people see a post as a defining opinion. For example I get accused of being a sycophant - but the truth is that I only engage with certain types of posts (to stop myself being on HOL as much as I used to be - I have a job and a sort of life, plus I do the radio so don't want to give out Hambo overkill) . The threads/posts I pick tend to be where I think someone has something wrong or is being unfair. So when I, or others, defend the board for example, automatically some people assume that this means a lack of acceptance of criticism. The same is often true when I observe people making salient, but perceptibly "negative" posts. There is tendency for people to dismiss those out of hand way too often rather than to engage/ HOL is at it's best when people are willing to discuss an issue - and accept that the end result is not always going to be an agreement. Trolls can sometimes make that a little tricky (you know who you are) - but most of the time it's just people talking, united by a shared interest/obsession. Some of my favourite posters, past and present, have been those I disagree with more often than not but who debate issues properly. It's what the site is all about IMO. More please.
HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link] [Tweet Link] My Twitter: [Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hambo Crawley 23 Jan 14 9.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote crystal-purley at 23 Jan 2014 9.02pm
tbh I think Scott Dann would be a good buy at the moment as he generally plays a similar number of games in a season to the number we have left, but obviously we would have to sign his twin brother too as cover. Haha, like it! The injury problems reinforce the insanity of his demands in my view. Having said that, if we want real quality there will probably be a degree of "damage" to come with them for them to see us as viable at this stage. Trying to avoid players who only see us as a chance to earn big money for a brief period is another aspect to a difficult window.
HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link] [Tweet Link] My Twitter: [Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
maxipalace in a box 23 Jan 14 11.14pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hambo at 23 Jan 2014 9.35pm
Quote crystal-purley at 23 Jan 2014 9.02pm
tbh I think Scott Dann would be a good buy at the moment as he generally plays a similar number of games in a season to the number we have left, but obviously we would have to sign his twin brother too as cover. Haha, like it! The injury problems reinforce the insanity of his demands in my view. Having said that, if we want real quality there will probably be a degree of "damage" to come with them for them to see us as viable at this stage. Trying to avoid players who only see us as a chance to earn big money for a brief period is another aspect to a difficult window.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.