What lawyers documents?? What evidence against Abromovich. All you brand about is allegations and assumptions. Bloody hell maybe you should live in that country because over here you need EVIDENCE to convict someone. If you can produce a shred of evidence about Abromovich instead of ineuendos and assumptions I'll gladly listen!
Is it not irrational to just assume someone is guilty of something because of where they came from or made their money without one shred of evidence.

You claim I am not rational because I dont accept your flawed arguement. And then you finish your rational behaviour with insults. Now thats funny!!!

Well, there isn't 'evidence' that Putin is a criminal. But you're just in denial or a fool if you didn't think it.

The evidence of brides is out there. There are a brave few who voice the crimes that go on in Russia by the men in power and control. However, how can it be 'proven' when we exist outside of the jurisdiction that controls the evidence? It's a stupid thing to even say. Anyway anyone who looks into Abramovich's career would have to be a loon not to recognise how he rose to power. You very obviously don't understand how Russia works.

This idea that Abramovich and Chelsea's money aren't dirty. Hell, people are murdered in the 'mafia state' for even revealing evidence....They even come over here and murder their opponents by sticking radiation in their tea.

Abramovich bribed he's way through the system in Russia. He was given control of resources that were the Russian people's not his. Like many who paid for that.

I said earlier that loads of Chelsea fans bend over for Abramovich. In my opinion you have identified yourself as one of them.

What you are saying is that there is evidence that corruption exists in Russia. Yes agreed there is evidence of that and yes I accept that this is true. However, and i'll say it agian, because you dont seem to understand the basic principles of justice. There is NO evidence that abromovich was part of this. Interestingly you seem to have lost it a bit now.As you have jumped from implying Abromovich is a crook to actually stating this:

'Abramovich bribed he's way through the system in Russia.

Please please give me ONE shred of evidance of this and not some bland generalistic waffle.

However your next sentence is quite interesting:

'He was given control of resources that were the Russian people's not his'

Christ now we are jumping in to new territory. Communism!!! Well if you follow that arguement then we have a lot of business examples in this country where people control our resources. Hmm lets look back at Palace chairman and there business interests

That's a straw man argument. I'm not a communist or a socialist. That's trying to move the goalposts.

However I do recognise the injustice in taking an economies assets and giving them to just a few people. Enriching them and reducing the benefits for the overall population.

That hasn't happened in capitalism....We have a little thing you might not have heard of, it's called competition and competition laws.

The transition from communism was completely corrupt. your boss benefited hugely from it. Only the wide eyed supporter like you defends that and can 'make believe' a path where Abramovich isn't corrupt.

Haha, the idea that your Putin supporting boss isn't a crook is something else.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

'However I do recognise the injustice in taking an economies assets and giving them to just a few people. Enriching them and reducing the benefits for the overall population.

That hasn't happened in capitalism....We have a little thing you might not have heard of, it's called competition and competition laws.'

Oh so its ok to do this as long as you do it in this country and not another!! And not happened in Capitalism!!!!
There are no examples of that in the Capitalist world then!! You sure!!! HA HA Blimey careful the water could get murky!!!!!!!!

Edited by chelski (15 Feb 2013 2.42pm)

Hmmm stealing is a big word but you do seem to be losing it. Ok I think one example will do although I wouldnt LEGALLY call it stealing. Its just called privatisation where you give the private sector a business below the market value and then sit back whist your mates (which often included party members and cabinet ministers) made a 'killing' on the stock market. Seeing as you like research. Look up the sale of BT!!

It's absurd to compare the poor privatizations of industries in Britain......Which I grant you hasn't been great in some areas to the corruption and injustice of what happened in Russia.

You are just deflecting, pure and simple.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)