You've already said several times that this is what they do. Now you're arguing about frequency. Would this overhaul stop them lying to us "in our best interest"?

Indeed.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

At the end of the day a healthy lifestyle, good food, moderate exercise, drinking water, sunshine, meditation all contribute to a strong immune system! Not some pharmaceutical injection making multimillionaires richer! Look after your own body and they make no money from that!

But it isn’t.

It’s John Campbell nodding and winking at a variety of comments made in a selected clip, taken out of context and prefaced by remarks of his own.

It’s all about John Campbell highlighting a bully trying to elicit yes or no answers to questions which don’t have yes or no answers.

How would you respond to something like “Did you stop beating your wife yesterday? Yes or no!

Say yes, get an eyebrow raised to camera and a second unrelated question. Say no, and get a torrent of assertions.

The only way to judge this exchange would be to watch the whole hearing, with questions from other people and to other people, setting this little clip in its context and without any outside comments, facial gestures or introductions at all.

Campbell lifts out one piece of a jigsaw and tries to suggest the whole picture can be determined from it. It’s what he does. He’s good at it, and getting rich from it, but it’s sad when people are fooled by it.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Nice try. Who would expect them to reveal state secrets? It doesn't imply it's all they do in the same way as saying someone reads books doesn't imply it's all they do 24/7.

I am glad we are in agreement.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.