This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Tickled pink Cornwall 16 Jan 21 4.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Seriously! You use the words "petulant child" for Wilf yet you want a new squad and a new manager. Have a word with yourself. There's quite a lot on here that fall into that same hole lol
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 18 Jan 21 10.41am | |
---|---|
True that! I am not sure what people realistically want with our club. All I want is for the club to play more entertaining football and not the dreary negative fayre we get dished up every week. OK. Part right; part over-statement. But there are colossal risks seeking to play entertaining football on our budget. Others have done it. Yup, but usually accompanied by an astonishingly lucky alignment of stars, like Leicester 2015. And would you risk it with our ageing squad (which is not down to Roy)? Others seem prepared to support our club taking the gamble. Go down fighting but with pride. Very noble, very short sighted and they would be the same people who would be the first to get on the backs of the management when we get stuffed 5-3 every week. Relegation is not an option but right now it is unthinkable. Blades fans would swap their position with ours in a heartbeat. And if we do pump funds in [which we obviously don't have] and rise up the table, to what end? We all know what a poison chalice the Europa League is for a club our size, so we don't want to end there until we're ready. Just off that gives us, say 8th. This would be a respectable finish and our highest in the modern Prem [but you lot out there would still complain]. However, the only financial difference for us between that place and where we are now is £10m. You would have to invest way more than that to achieve that return. I know other clubs are doing that; but seriously, what sensible business would do that? We now have cat 1 youth status and just need to get passed the ransom strip dispute with Sainsbury's before the ground is re-built [where funds have been ring-fenced]. The training and support facilities have also been brought up to Prem standards. We have not stood still. However, Covid must have battered our resources, like everyone else's. To survive this cycle, we need to tightly control expenditure but ensure the Prem income continues. That means treading water in safe mid table on a restricted budget. If the faith in the vaccine is paid, that could mean us [and Burnley, who follow the same path] entering the new season, hardly awash with money but at least in a safe financial condition to build on. Can the same be said of others with already vast, possibly unsustainable, debt? There are other issues that will plague our summer. 19 contracts up for renewal, a very old squad and limited resources available to refresh it. I can see a few players leaving, a lot of 1 year extensions and most of those who stay having to be flogged to get just one more season out of them. Next season will be that little bit more difficult. And so to Roy. Where does he feature in all this? He doesn't control the business side, and is probably only consulted on player acquisition. His role, as I see it, is to keep the club in that safe mid table, to ride out the current economic storm, to get that extra % from those ageing players, and to safely steer the club to its next level. Within this scheme, he seems to me to be the perfect man for that job and is doing it OK. The trouble is, this plan is long term and requires caution, prudence and patience. These are features that many fans on here clearly do not have in abundance.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 18 Jan 21 10.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
True that! I am not sure what people realistically want with our club. All I want is for the club to play more entertaining football and not the dreary negative fayre we get dished up every week. OK. Part right; part over-statement. But there are colossal risks seeking to play entertaining football on our budget. Others have done it. Yup, but usually accompanied by an astonishingly lucky alignment of stars, like Leicester 2015. And would you risk it with our ageing squad (which is not down to Roy)? Others seem prepared to support our club taking the gamble. Go down fighting but with pride. Very noble, very short sighted and they would be the same people who would be the first to get on the backs of the management when we get stuffed 5-3 every week. Relegation is not an option but right now it is unthinkable. Blades fans would swap their position with ours in a heartbeat. And if we do pump funds in [which we obviously don't have] and rise up the table, to what end? We all know what a poison chalice the Europa League is for a club our size, so we don't want to end there until we're ready. Just off that gives us, say 8th. This would be a respectable finish and our highest in the modern Prem [but you lot out there would still complain]. However, the only financial difference for us between that place and where we are now is £10m. You would have to invest way more than that to achieve that return. I know other clubs are doing that; but seriously, what sensible business would do that? We now have cat 1 youth status and just need to get passed the ransom strip dispute with Sainsbury's before the ground is re-built [where funds have been ring-fenced]. The training and support facilities have also been brought up to Prem standards. We have not stood still. However, Covid must have battered our resources, like everyone else's. To survive this cycle, we need to tightly control expenditure but ensure the Prem income continues. That means treading water in safe mid table on a restricted budget. If the faith in the vaccine is paid, that could mean us [and Burnley, who follow the same path] entering the new season, hardly awash with money but at least in a safe financial condition to build on. Can the same be said of others with already vast, possibly unsustainable, debt? There are other issues that will plague our summer. 19 contracts up for renewal, a very old squad and limited resources available to refresh it. I can see a few players leaving, a lot of 1 year extensions and most of those who stay having to be flogged to get just one more season out of them. Next season will be that little bit more difficult. And so to Roy. Where does he feature in all this? He doesn't control the business side, and is probably only consulted on player acquisition. His role, as I see it, is to keep the club in that safe mid table, to ride out the current economic storm, to get that extra % from those ageing players, and to safely steer the club to its next level. Within this scheme, he seems to me to be the perfect man for that job and is doing it OK. The trouble is, this plan is long term and requires caution, prudence and patience. These are features that many fans on here clearly do not have in abundance. This is an excellent summary of the situation. The Sheffield Utd point is a great one. I agree kicking him out for someone unproven or relatively wet behind the ears simply to gain more attacking football and to hell with the risk is madness, but, if someone is available that is slightly younger, but crucially still experienced, do the club stick or twist? (BTW I mean someone that isn't the revolving door of english managers eg. Fat Sam. Younger than that) I agree that player recruitment and an ageing squad is hardly all down to him but as you say we're going to be in a position at the end of this season where significant squad refreshment is likely. Is he the man to invest in that seeing as even the most optimistic supporter would not expect him to have more than one or two seasons left in him, at most? It's a bit of a conundrum. Basically there's no easy answer. Edited by SW19 CPFC (18 Jan 2021 10.54am)
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jan 21 10.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
True that! I am not sure what people realistically want with our club. All I want is for the club to play more entertaining football and not the dreary negative fayre we get dished up every week. OK. Part right; part over-statement. But there are colossal risks seeking to play entertaining football on our budget. Others have done it. Yup, but usually accompanied by an astonishingly lucky alignment of stars, like Leicester 2015. And would you risk it with our ageing squad (which is not down to Roy)? Others seem prepared to support our club taking the gamble. Go down fighting but with pride. Very noble, very short sighted and they would be the same people who would be the first to get on the backs of the management when we get stuffed 5-3 every week. Relegation is not an option but right now it is unthinkable. Blades fans would swap their position with ours in a heartbeat. And if we do pump funds in [which we obviously don't have] and rise up the table, to what end? We all know what a poison chalice the Europa League is for a club our size, so we don't want to end there until we're ready. Just off that gives us, say 8th. This would be a respectable finish and our highest in the modern Prem [but you lot out there would still complain]. However, the only financial difference for us between that place and where we are now is £10m. You would have to invest way more than that to achieve that return. I know other clubs are doing that; but seriously, what sensible business would do that? We now have cat 1 youth status and just need to get passed the ransom strip dispute with Sainsbury's before the ground is re-built [where funds have been ring-fenced]. The training and support facilities have also been brought up to Prem standards. We have not stood still. However, Covid must have battered our resources, like everyone else's. To survive this cycle, we need to tightly control expenditure but ensure the Prem income continues. That means treading water in safe mid table on a restricted budget. If the faith in the vaccine is paid, that could mean us [and Burnley, who follow the same path] entering the new season, hardly awash with money but at least in a safe financial condition to build on. Can the same be said of others with already vast, possibly unsustainable, debt? There are other issues that will plague our summer. 19 contracts up for renewal, a very old squad and limited resources available to refresh it. I can see a few players leaving, a lot of 1 year extensions and most of those who stay having to be flogged to get just one more season out of them. Next season will be that little bit more difficult. And so to Roy. Where does he feature in all this? He doesn't control the business side, and is probably only consulted on player acquisition. His role, as I see it, is to keep the club in that safe mid table, to ride out the current economic storm, to get that extra % from those ageing players, and to safely steer the club to its next level. Within this scheme, he seems to me to be the perfect man for that job and is doing it OK. The trouble is, this plan is long term and requires caution, prudence and patience. These are features that many fans on here clearly do not have in abundance. May I congratulate you on an excellent contribution to the debate.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southnorwoodhill 18 Jan 21 11.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
This is an excellent summary of the situation. The Sheffield Utd point is a great one. I agree kicking him out for someone unproven or relatively wet behind the ears simply to gain more attacking football and to hell with the risk is madness, but, if someone is available that is slightly younger, but crucially still experienced, do the club stick or twist? (BTW I mean someone that isn't the revolving door of english managers eg. Fat Sam. Younger than that) I agree that player recruitment and an ageing squad is hardly all down to him but as you say we're going to be in a position at the end of this season where significant squad refreshment is likely. Is he the man to invest in that seeing as even the most optimistic supporter would not expect him to have more than one or two seasons left in him, at most? It's a bit of a conundrum. Basically there's no easy answer. Edited by SW19 CPFC (18 Jan 2021 10.54am) Good post, and these 30 plus players at the end of their contracts can't keep on playing forever, neither can a 73 year old manager stuck in his ways be expected to carry the club on to the next phase of development over the next few years. We are at that point where change will happen, come what may.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jan 21 11.27am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
Good post, and these 30 plus players at the end of their contracts can't keep on playing forever, neither can a 73 year old manager stuck in his ways be expected to carry the club on to the next phase of development over the next few years. We are at that point where change will happen, come what may. I know from personal experience that once one reaches a certain time in one's lifespan one suffers similar accusations. Mr Hodgson can call on years of football experience (44 years as a manager), he is well-respected worldwide and has ensured we have stayed in the PL for 3 seasons, which of course would be extended if we avoid the dreaded drop this campaign. Edited by Willo (18 Jan 2021 11.39am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Jan 21 11.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
True that! I am not sure what people realistically want with our club. All I want is for the club to play more entertaining football and not the dreary negative fayre we get dished up every week. OK. Part right; part over-statement. But there are colossal risks seeking to play entertaining football on our budget. Others have done it. Yup, but usually accompanied by an astonishingly lucky alignment of stars, like Leicester 2015. And would you risk it with our ageing squad (which is not down to Roy)? Others seem prepared to support our club taking the gamble. Go down fighting but with pride. Very noble, very short sighted and they would be the same people who would be the first to get on the backs of the management when we get stuffed 5-3 every week. Relegation is not an option but right now it is unthinkable. Blades fans would swap their position with ours in a heartbeat. And if we do pump funds in [which we obviously don't have] and rise up the table, to what end? We all know what a poison chalice the Europa League is for a club our size, so we don't want to end there until we're ready. Just off that gives us, say 8th. This would be a respectable finish and our highest in the modern Prem [but you lot out there would still complain]. However, the only financial difference for us between that place and where we are now is £10m. You would have to invest way more than that to achieve that return. I know other clubs are doing that; but seriously, what sensible business would do that? We now have cat 1 youth status and just need to get passed the ransom strip dispute with Sainsbury's before the ground is re-built [where funds have been ring-fenced]. The training and support facilities have also been brought up to Prem standards. We have not stood still. However, Covid must have battered our resources, like everyone else's. To survive this cycle, we need to tightly control expenditure but ensure the Prem income continues. That means treading water in safe mid table on a restricted budget. If the faith in the vaccine is paid, that could mean us [and Burnley, who follow the same path] entering the new season, hardly awash with money but at least in a safe financial condition to build on. Can the same be said of others with already vast, possibly unsustainable, debt? There are other issues that will plague our summer. 19 contracts up for renewal, a very old squad and limited resources available to refresh it. I can see a few players leaving, a lot of 1 year extensions and most of those who stay having to be flogged to get just one more season out of them. Next season will be that little bit more difficult. And so to Roy. Where does he feature in all this? He doesn't control the business side, and is probably only consulted on player acquisition. His role, as I see it, is to keep the club in that safe mid table, to ride out the current economic storm, to get that extra % from those ageing players, and to safely steer the club to its next level. Within this scheme, he seems to me to be the perfect man for that job and is doing it OK. The trouble is, this plan is long term and requires caution, prudence and patience. These are features that many fans on here clearly do not have in abundance. This is, quite simply, a magnificent post. A perfect summary. Take a bow, sir.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cpfc1861 18 Jan 21 11.40am | |
---|---|
Not even sure you can really call this football the changing room seems to be down our best player wants out lets face it something needs to change whether it be new players or a manager it's gone stale and the players.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CT GUY-BIGBALD EAGLE bloomfield 18 Jan 21 11.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
This is, quite simply, a magnificent post. A perfect summary. Take a bow, sir. you guys need to start a Roy In thread and post your defeatist garbage there. a 4-4-2 with all banks in our half for 93 minutes is NOT football. On Happenstance Hodgeson I stand with Roberto Carlos - He doesnt know much about football.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 18 Jan 21 11.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
True that! I am not sure what people realistically want with our club. All I want is for the club to play more entertaining football and not the dreary negative fayre we get dished up every week. OK. Part right; part over-statement. But there are colossal risks seeking to play entertaining football on our budget. Others have done it. Yup, but usually accompanied by an astonishingly lucky alignment of stars, like Leicester 2015. And would you risk it with our ageing squad (which is not down to Roy)? Others seem prepared to support our club taking the gamble. Go down fighting but with pride. Very noble, very short sighted and they would be the same people who would be the first to get on the backs of the management when we get stuffed 5-3 every week. Relegation is not an option but right now it is unthinkable. Blades fans would swap their position with ours in a heartbeat. And if we do pump funds in [which we obviously don't have] and rise up the table, to what end? We all know what a poison chalice the Europa League is for a club our size, so we don't want to end there until we're ready. Just off that gives us, say 8th. This would be a respectable finish and our highest in the modern Prem [but you lot out there would still complain]. However, the only financial difference for us between that place and where we are now is £10m. You would have to invest way more than that to achieve that return. I know other clubs are doing that; but seriously, what sensible business would do that? We now have cat 1 youth status and just need to get passed the ransom strip dispute with Sainsbury's before the ground is re-built [where funds have been ring-fenced]. The training and support facilities have also been brought up to Prem standards. We have not stood still. However, Covid must have battered our resources, like everyone else's. To survive this cycle, we need to tightly control expenditure but ensure the Prem income continues. That means treading water in safe mid table on a restricted budget. If the faith in the vaccine is paid, that could mean us [and Burnley, who follow the same path] entering the new season, hardly awash with money but at least in a safe financial condition to build on. Can the same be said of others with already vast, possibly unsustainable, debt? There are other issues that will plague our summer. 19 contracts up for renewal, a very old squad and limited resources available to refresh it. I can see a few players leaving, a lot of 1 year extensions and most of those who stay having to be flogged to get just one more season out of them. Next season will be that little bit more difficult. And so to Roy. Where does he feature in all this? He doesn't control the business side, and is probably only consulted on player acquisition. His role, as I see it, is to keep the club in that safe mid table, to ride out the current economic storm, to get that extra % from those ageing players, and to safely steer the club to its next level. Within this scheme, he seems to me to be the perfect man for that job and is doing it OK. The trouble is, this plan is long term and requires caution, prudence and patience. These are features that many fans on here clearly do not have in abundance. Very well written and completely in keeping with my thoughts.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 18 Jan 21 11.59am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by CT GUY-BIGBALD EAGLE
you guys need to start a Roy In thread and post your defeatist garbage there. a 4-4-2 with all banks in our half for 93 minutes is NOT football. On Happenstance Hodgeson I stand with Roberto Carlos - He doesnt know much about football. You sum up the myopic views of some of the anti Hodgson brigade. Try looking beyond the manager and instead look holistically at the club's situation which was summarised by Silvertop.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 18 Jan 21 12.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
True that! I am not sure what people realistically want with our club. All I want is for the club to play more entertaining football and not the dreary negative fayre we get dished up every week. OK. Part right; part over-statement. But there are colossal risks seeking to play entertaining football on our budget. Others have done it. Yup, but usually accompanied by an astonishingly lucky alignment of stars, like Leicester 2015. And would you risk it with our ageing squad (which is not down to Roy)? Others seem prepared to support our club taking the gamble. Go down fighting but with pride. Very noble, very short sighted and they would be the same people who would be the first to get on the backs of the management when we get stuffed 5-3 every week. Relegation is not an option but right now it is unthinkable. Blades fans would swap their position with ours in a heartbeat. And if we do pump funds in [which we obviously don't have] and rise up the table, to what end? We all know what a poison chalice the Europa League is for a club our size, so we don't want to end there until we're ready. Just off that gives us, say 8th. This would be a respectable finish and our highest in the modern Prem [but you lot out there would still complain]. However, the only financial difference for us between that place and where we are now is £10m. You would have to invest way more than that to achieve that return. I know other clubs are doing that; but seriously, what sensible business would do that? We now have cat 1 youth status and just need to get passed the ransom strip dispute with Sainsbury's before the ground is re-built [where funds have been ring-fenced]. The training and support facilities have also been brought up to Prem standards. We have not stood still. However, Covid must have battered our resources, like everyone else's. To survive this cycle, we need to tightly control expenditure but ensure the Prem income continues. That means treading water in safe mid table on a restricted budget. If the faith in the vaccine is paid, that could mean us [and Burnley, who follow the same path] entering the new season, hardly awash with money but at least in a safe financial condition to build on. Can the same be said of others with already vast, possibly unsustainable, debt? There are other issues that will plague our summer. 19 contracts up for renewal, a very old squad and limited resources available to refresh it. I can see a few players leaving, a lot of 1 year extensions and most of those who stay having to be flogged to get just one more season out of them. Next season will be that little bit more difficult. And so to Roy. Where does he feature in all this? He doesn't control the business side, and is probably only consulted on player acquisition. His role, as I see it, is to keep the club in that safe mid table, to ride out the current economic storm, to get that extra % from those ageing players, and to safely steer the club to its next level. Within this scheme, he seems to me to be the perfect man for that job and is doing it OK. The trouble is, this plan is long term and requires caution, prudence and patience. These are features that many fans on here clearly do not have in abundance. Whilst entertaining football would be lovely I think most are aware of the points you have raised. For me, I am quite happy with pragmatic football given our position and often feel a certain smugness when we do (and we have) get results against teams with far superior resources to ours. The moans from their fans are a cherry on top for me. What is worrying however, or more so unforgivable, is that we are now seeing far too many performances from our team which lack any belief, effort (some characterise this as passion) or even the slightest notion of attacking intent. I do not expect us to turn into peak Barcelona overnight, nor do I expect to see that on the pitch week in week out and can take the losses when they happen (which they inevitably will), however it is criminal for me that we are playing games in which we are not even competitive. We have been a Premier League team for years now and last night was a prime example of another of our weekend games being a non-event whereby no shots on target, no real attacks whatsoever and backs against the walls but still conceding goals seemed like a foregone conclusion most could have predicted. Completely sucks any joy out or even defeats the purpose of following a football team.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.