Oh I see, you realised you're not really making a point so tried a put down. Bye!

Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Oh dear.
1) All of our acts of law form the basis of the legal definition of constitutional law regarding the treaty. [Link]
2) As for keeping up with current events?

The EU cannot extend A50. They have agreed to accept an extension, should the proposal get through parliament. This is subject to unanimous approval and change in law.

Thanks to Gina Miller, the UK must leave the EU on the 29th March.

Your ignorance is staggering, your attempts to deflect your own misunderstandings shameless and the insults you hurl good indication that you are well and truly beaten.

When the debate is over, slander is the tool of the loser.

Take care.

Edited by ChrisGC (25 Mar 2019 7.19am)

If you go back 1500 pages to the start of this thread and read it you will be reminded how we all perceived the referendum. I don’t suppose anyone realised just what a tangle this thing would become, clearly exhibited by angry frustrated recent post on here.
Allowing a referendum opened up a can of worms that has turned into a hornets nest.
What is happening is an example of how political correctness makes most things unworkable.
This needs a good kicking and a heavy hand to get it sorted, neither of which are in the DNA of any politician. They are ALL bar none a complete bunch of soap suds..
And snowflakes!!

I find the relative strength of opinion enlightening

Of course those with whom you meet are pro Brexit.

Meanwhile there were two marches and two petitions. It seems to me that whilst Brexiteers would 'kind of like' to get their way they aren't exactly putting their back into it. Whereas Remainers are highly energised fearing major long-term damage needs to be averted.

And by the way, this is a major reason not to have a plebiscite. The relative effects on each side are out of balance. A simple majority does not take into account either the effects nor strength of opinion.

Edited by Mapletree (25 Mar 2019 8.21am)

There has been much talk about the so called "indicative votes" this week. Of course there is the possibility that there may be no option which receives overall support from MPs.

This is precisely what those campaigning for a second referendum want to happen. Their hope is that the Commons will demonstrate that it can’t reach a conclusion – and therefore Brexit must be returned to the electorate for a so called "Peoples vote".

The fact that we have NOT left the EU on 29th March and it has got to this speaks volumes.At the end of the day 17.4 mill voted to leave and we must honour the referendum and leave.Spitting feathers in the Willo abode.

Edited by Willo (25 Mar 2019 9.16am)

That point had occurred to me when I wrote my post Badger. But seeing that there is such strength of opinion on the other side, and a real prospect of some kind of block or watering down on May's proposed deal, I am genuinely surprised at how little mobilisation has happened

I surmise that is because the concept of Brexit is too complex. I think the most vocal would accept a no deal Brexit but the majority of Leave voters probably would not. And some of those would have gone for a Customs Union.

Had we been German we would have started with a plan. Instead we do the classic Brit thing and launch into something about which we know little real detail

This is The Charge of the Light Brigade stuff, not bravery - simply folly.