This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Midlands Eagle 21 Mar 19 7.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
There are issues with each meat type. Salmonella is primarily related to chicken which is where this thread had been focusing. BSE is also an issue, as is scrapie The article that I linked to a couple of pages back that you poo pooed stated that whilst American chicken samples had a large percentage that contained salmonella a 2016 study by the UK’s Food Standards Agency found comparable levels of contamination in this country
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 21 Mar 19 8.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Blame was 34% the government and 24% MP's. Polls not my thing but 90% saying that is different. But were they asked the question I put? Just a thought because polls can be designed to suit any agenda (it's all in the wording of the questions)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 21 Mar 19 8.07am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Wouldn't be very high Only 52% want out and only a smaller % want Brexit at all costs How do you know this? Presumably you have true facts
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 21 Mar 19 8.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Actually a combination of the two. More bollocks. Maybe all that hormonal beef and chlorinated chicken affects the brain. Anyone else got any more inaccurate partisan drivel to spoon out? Don't bet against Steeleye and Pussay
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 21 Mar 19 8.23am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
But were they asked the question I put? Just a thought because polls can be designed to suit any agenda (it's all in the wording of the questions) Exactly ask a member of the pubic who generally votes Tory the following questions: Who is stronger on the NHS Labour or Tory? Who is stronger on helping the sick and the poor? Who is better for pensioners? Who is better on foreign aid? Who will you be voting for? (Embarrassed) Err Labour Works the other way just ask a Labour voter about the economy, defence, law & order. In fairness most independent pollsters are aware of this and try to be as neutral as possible however there is one disconnect they cannot fix which is people like me. If I see someone with a clipboard in the high street I swat them away, others may be more polite but the result is the same. Pollsters therefore end up interviewing people who are either actively interested in politics or they have nothing better to do. So people like me are the great un-polled which is why pollsters can be wrong if enough of us refuse to give our opinions. Of course pollsters also use telephone polls and the internet. Well I put the phone down and I can't be bothered to do internet polls so again you end up with a distorted section of the population. I suspect that most people with busy lives only think of politics on the day of an election so how can you plan for that. Then again some of us with nothing better to do prefer to spout on football websites about politics. As they say oop north "there's nowt as queer as folk"
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 21 Mar 19 9.43am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
How do you know this? Presumably you have true facts Just applied a bit of logic If the number cannot be higher than 52, then take out the rational people I'd say its anywhere between 0 - 30% Whats your opinion?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 21 Mar 19 9.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Judging by informal polls on BBC News I thought that they picked out the stupidest looking people to ask their opinions
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 21 Mar 19 9.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Good point well made Albeit Aldi is actually one of the best at managing its food supply chain, usually buying locally. Along with the Lidl in New Addington. It's the Mecca......I must go there at some point.....I actually have an 'Aunt' in New Addington.....though she's quite a feminist hippy and thinks I make Neanderthal look good......though weirdly enough all her long term partners were rather nasty alphas. Edited by Stirlingsays (21 Mar 2019 10.02am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 21 Mar 19 10.02am | |
---|---|
Who is stronger on the NHS Labour or Tory? Stronger? the answer here is neither when we are bringing in 250,000 net new people per year (more if you take into account significant numbers leaving the country) you simply cannot keep up and cannot keep taxing people to support a bloated NHS and social security system. Who is stronger on helping the sick and the poor? Labour are significantly worse as they spread the socialist lie that it's OK to steal other peoples money because you are poorer. Very few are truly poor in the west as capitalism continues to improve prosperity both in the west and the 3rd world. Who is better for pensioners? Ask my mum who worked all her life and now has Parkinsons and can't get decent treatment because much of the money she paid in national insurance is re-directed to economic migrants. So again neither Labour nor Tory. Who is better on foreign aid? Better in what way? Cameron decided to commit billions to this long term but aid generally makes 3rd world countries more dependent (people thinking food comes off the back of a lorry) whereas capitalism has reduced poverty massively all over the world. The World Health Organization massively underestimated this (targets were hit years in advance). The rise of socialism/communism/Marxism is a huge threat to poor people all over the world.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 21 Mar 19 10.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
The article that I linked to a couple of pages back that you poo pooed stated that whilst American chicken samples had a large percentage that contained salmonella a 2016 study by the UK’s Food Standards Agency found comparable levels of contamination in this country I wish you would put on your glasses before commenting on articles A 2015 WHO study found that rates of campylobacter infection were similar in the EU and North America. However, it also revealed that infection rates for Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi were, respectively, four times and five times higher in North America than in Europe. On another note: You know, if there's one thing I've learnt from being in the Army, it's never ignore a pooh-pooh. I knew a Major, who got pooh-poohed, made the mistake of ignoring the pooh-pooh. He pooh-poohed it! Fatal error! 'Cos it turned out all along that the soldier who pooh-poohed him had been pooh-poohing a lot of other officers who pooh-poohed their pooh-poohs. In the end, we had to disband the regiment. Morale totally destroyed... by pooh-pooh! Edited by Mapletree (21 Mar 2019 10.10am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 21 Mar 19 10.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I wish you would put on your glasses before commenting on articles A 2015 WHO study found that rates of campylobacter infection were similar in the EU and North America. However, it also revealed that infection rates for Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi were, respectively, four times and five times higher in North America than in Europe. On another note: You know, if there's one thing I've learnt from being in the Army, it's never ignore a pooh-pooh. I knew a Major, who got pooh-poohed, made the mistake of ignoring the pooh-pooh. He pooh-poohed it! Fatal error! 'Cos it turned out all along that the soldier who pooh-poohed him had been pooh-poohing a lot of other officers who pooh-poohed their pooh-poohs. In the end, we had to disband the regiment. Morale totally destroyed... by pooh-pooh! Edited by Mapletree (21 Mar 2019 10.10am) I've had salmonella and it really isn't very nice but I'd take another dose right now to get out of the EUSSR.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DANGERCLOSE London 21 Mar 19 10.37am | |
---|---|
Remainers: Remind me, with actual evidence, why you are so scared of a clean WTO 100% Brexit. What consequences to you foresee?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.