I tend to agree, however, to temper this, he has certainly lost some pace. He's not slow but he is slower. A more standard, crossing winger might do us the world of good when I think about it. For flair and game changing we now have Olise and Eze. Those with a pacy enough winger who creates chances should be pretty good. We might well improve if we get the right kind of player. Ayew and Edouard are not realistic left wingers for the entire season. Ayew can do a job, as we've seen. Edouard has had flashes of being relatively average at left wing but mainly pretty poor. We have to either buy or go with what we've got. We've been linked with Sarr for years. Maybe we'll even sign him now. I wouldn't think he's 20 mil now but could be wrong. Surprisingly decent stats when you look into it. Something like 10 goals this season.

Red and Blue Army!

Maybe, but he played when we lost 0-1 to them. With Wilf missing a penalty!

Wilf is still the difference between us and some teams in the League - and he still could be if he wants to stay.
My take on it is that he wants 4 years and we don't.
However - if he made the difference - total difference - as he would have done on Sunday - then he could add 20 points to the total when we play teams below or around us.
He has a quality - still - that we don't possess without him.
I would give him 4 years at £200k/week personally - £40m over 4 years - it will cost us that to buy even a shadow of Wilf, let alone the wages involved.

I have loved Wilf over the years and he still has the x-factor quality that is hard to find. The problem in the past was Palace did not have anyone close to his ability hence why in some previous seasons the game plan was just get the ball to Wilf.
The gap now between Wilf and the rest of our front players has been closed and we no longer look noticeably weaker when he is not playing. Would i like Wilf to be playing for Palace along side the likes of Olise Ayew and Eze then yes but we don't have to break the bank to make this happen.
I think Saar would be a viable replacement and would not cost us the same in wages and would have a potential sell on value where after 4 years Wilf would be close to retirement.

Why would Arsenal want him as they already have Saka

Mystifying, really, as striking is something the French are usually pretty good at.