You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer
November 22 2024 1.16pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sir Keir Starmer

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 15 of 65 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

  

cryrst Flag The garden of England 10 Apr 20 7.14pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

that's 'adhesion' - some furious googling going on, some jokers on the labour front bench? Nobody as serious as Priti Patel or Jacob Rees Mogg? Starmer is Blair mark 2 and will eventually disappoint the lefties, they're all tories really you see, but he'll make Labour electable and quicker than some of you would like to believe, he's no mug and is the first decent leader Labour have had since Brown - that's the danger of party democracy it ignores the fact that a substantial proportion of any political party membership is made up of nutters - hence Ian Duncan Smith and Milliband/Corbyn - Starmer's strategy will be spot on and his appointments will favour talent and send out the message he thinks needs sending. So beware Tory boys, underestimate Starmer at your peril, he's a serious operator for serious times and the voters will respect him. I want to hear Labour on reintroducing a mixed economy where private companies acting as monopolies DO NOT make our infrastructure expensive and inefficient, a situation borne of Thatcherism carried out by BOTH parties.

Privatisation then.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 10 Apr 20 7.20pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

that's 'adhesion' - some furious googling going on, some jokers on the labour front bench? Nobody as serious as Priti Patel or Jacob Rees Mogg? Starmer is Blair mark 2 and will eventually disappoint the lefties, they're all tories really you see, but he'll make Labour electable and quicker than some of you would like to believe, he's no mug and is the first decent leader Labour have had since Brown - that's the danger of party democracy it ignores the fact that a substantial proportion of any political party membership is made up of nutters - hence Ian Duncan Smith and Milliband/Corbyn - Starmer's strategy will be spot on and his appointments will favour talent and send out the message he thinks needs sending. So beware Tory boys, underestimate Starmer at your peril, he's a serious operator for serious times and the voters will respect him. I want to hear Labour on reintroducing a mixed economy where private companies acting as monopolies DO NOT make our infrastructure expensive and inefficient, a situation borne of Thatcherism carried out by BOTH parties.


Co-he•sive &#9658;
Characterized by, causing, or concerned in cohesion or the quality of adhering together, literally or figuratively: as, cohesive force.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 10 Apr 20 7.38pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Privatisation then.

noooo that's a market economy if I remember from my Economics O Level, then there's a planned economy (communism or fascism (corporatism)), then there's a mixed economy which is what intelligent countries have, and then there's this hybrid private-public mess where natural monopolies are private (a disaster) instead of state-owned so you get a gravy train for unaccountable leaders to over-pay themselves and under-invest in whatever national asset they're in charge of which is what besets us atm - Carillion are the prime example - it's bankruptcy meant hospitals and schools didn't get built while the board paid itself millions in bonuses and faced no penalty for bleeding the funds to the point where the company collapsed - Starmer's thoughts on bank reform will be of interest too.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 10 Apr 20 8.09pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

noooo that's a market economy if I remember from my Economics O Level, then there's a planned economy (communism or fascism (corporatism)), then there's a mixed economy which is what intelligent countries have, and then there's this hybrid private-public mess where natural monopolies are private (a disaster) instead of state-owned so you get a gravy train for unaccountable leaders to over-pay themselves and under-invest in whatever national asset they're in charge of which is what besets us atm - Carillion are the prime example - it's bankruptcy meant hospitals and schools didn't get built while the board paid itself millions in bonuses and faced no penalty for bleeding the funds to the point where the company collapsed - Starmer's thoughts on bank reform will be of interest too.

I know I'm being pedantic but I suspect for your O level you wrote using capitals and subject related paragraphs.

That said, some of the content is interesting.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 10 Apr 20 10.09pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist


Starmer is Blair mark 2 and will eventually disappoint the lefties, they're all tories really you see, but he'll make Labour electable and quicker than some of you would like to believe...

Make Labour electable or actually win a majority in Parliament in 2024?

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 10 Apr 20 10.25pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by ex hibitionist

noooo that's a market economy if I remember from my Economics O Level, then there's a planned economy (communism or fascism (corporatism)), then there's a mixed economy which is what intelligent countries have, and then there's this hybrid private-public mess where natural monopolies are private (a disaster) instead of state-owned so you get a gravy train for unaccountable leaders to over-pay themselves and under-invest in whatever national asset they're in charge of which is what besets us atm - Carillion are the prime example - it's bankruptcy meant hospitals and schools didn't get built while the board paid itself millions in bonuses and faced no penalty for bleeding the funds to the point where the company collapsed - Starmer's thoughts on bank reform will be of interest too.

So the great PFI plan from labour which still burdens schools and hospitals I beleive. And will do for 20 more years, is that helping to stop what your explaining should happen. Or have PFIs been cancelled.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 10 Apr 20 11.25pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

So the great PFI plan from labour which still burdens schools and hospitals I beleive. And will do for 20 more years, is that helping to stop what your explaining should happen. Or have PFIs been cancelled.

PFI was originally a Conservative policy and has been used by both parties extensively.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 10 Apr 20 11.55pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

Make Labour electable or actually win a majority in Parliament in 2024?

They would definitely need to win back Scotland from the SNP.

Doesn't look that likely at the moment.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 11 Apr 20 8.00am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

PFI was originally a Conservative policy and has been used by both parties extensively.

Correct in 1992 but little used by the tories.
Labour then went mad with it from 2000. Left sectors with billions of burden still to this day.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mapletree Flag Croydon 11 Apr 20 9.36am Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Correct in 1992 but little used by the tories.
Labour then went mad with it from 2000. Left sectors with billions of burden still to this day.

Actually not true. The early Labour PFI contracts signed by Labour were initiated by the Conservatives. I note the misinformation issued by CCHT. It uses volume not value to make its political point.

Both parties used it. Originally the advice was it was good value for money. Then the advice changed

The big issue is the protection given to the investors, far beyond protection for all other stakeholders.

Read the FT from 17 September 2017

Edited by Mapletree (11 Apr 2020 9.39am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 11 Apr 20 10.05am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

Actually not true. The early Labour PFI contracts signed by Labour were initiated by the Conservatives. I note the misinformation issued by CCHT. It uses volume not value to make its political point.

Both parties used it. Originally the advice was it was good value for money. Then the advice changed

The big issue is the protection given to the investors, far beyond protection for all other stakeholders.

Read the FT from 17 September 2017

Edited by Mapletree (11 Apr 2020 9.39am)

So Labour went ahead with PFI and expanded the process but that is OK because the Tories came up with the idea?

Classic Lefty hypocrisy.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 11 Apr 20 10.36am Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

the point is that BOTH parties were to blame for PFI which is good value only in the short term and very bad value in the long term, and all the little people (stakeholders) take the risk and the big people (investors) get the reward - and this is what has to stop, risk and reward have to be put in the right places. Take hospitals, not enough salary, contract rights nor appreciation go to magnificent staff and too much money and job security goes to managers, HR and suited sharks be they recruitment agencies or over-charging providers.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 15 of 65 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer