This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Jul 19 9.26am | |
---|---|
‘The Disciplinary Committee sanctioned Chelsea with a ban on registering new players at both national and international level for the next two (2) complete and consecutive registration periods.’ I’m not sure that signing a new player (Zaha for example), and loaning him out (to us) wouldn’t count as registering new players. This ban is universally known as a transfer embargo. If it wasn’t that then I’d expect it to be called, by all the media, a ban on playing new players (putting them in, or registering them in Prem, Champions league squads). I think the word ‘registering’ may have been confused by grumpymort. Any player bought would be registered with the buying club, even if they’re loaned out. Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Jul 2019 9.26am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Jul 19 9.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Master Coin
I’ve been saying this for ages. It isn’t sustainable to constantly buy 28 year olds at market rates. You need to constantly pick up a couple of Meyer type signings annually and hope that one or two of them can be converted to profits a couple years down the line. Sad but true for us. Sadly it’s a spiral we cannot break because of the urgency to replace the ageing player on his way out with an established but cheaper option in a late 20 something player.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bexleydave Barnehurst 27 Jul 19 10.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
‘The Disciplinary Committee sanctioned Chelsea with a ban on registering new players at both national and international level for the next two (2) complete and consecutive registration periods.’ I’m not sure that signing a new player (Zaha for example), and loaning him out (to us) wouldn’t count as registering new players. This ban is universally known as a transfer embargo. If it wasn’t that then I’d expect it to be called, by all the media, a ban on playing new players (putting them in, or registering them in Prem, Champions league squads). I think the word ‘registering’ may have been confused by grumpymort. Any player bought would be registered with the buying club, even if they’re loaned out.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Bearcage Welling 27 Jul 19 10.23am | |
---|---|
They can’t sign and loan as the player would still need to be registered, so breach their ban; there are also rules on third party ownership that they’d need to negotiate. They could sign a legally binding agreement to sign at a later date I do think contracts and registration are two different entities. Wasn’t it Leicester who bought a player and failed to register him before the deadline, so couldn’t play him. However, like the rest of us, I don’t know for certain. Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
‘The Disciplinary Committee sanctioned Chelsea with a ban on registering new players at both national and international level for the next two (2) complete and consecutive registration periods.’ I’m not sure that signing a new player (Zaha for example), and loaning him out (to us) wouldn’t count as registering new players. This ban is universally known as a transfer embargo. If it wasn’t that then I’d expect it to be called, by all the media, a ban on playing new players (putting them in, or registering them in Prem, Champions league squads). I think the word ‘registering’ may have been confused by grumpymort. Any player bought would be registered with the buying club, even if they’re loaned out. Edited by Rudi Hedman (27 Jul 2019 9.26am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 27 Jul 19 11.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bearcage
They can’t sign and loan as the player would still need to be registered, so breach their ban; there are also rules on third party ownership that they’d need to negotiate. They could sign a legally binding agreement to sign at a later date I do think contracts and registration are two different entities. Wasn’t it Leicester who bought a player and failed to register him before the deadline, so couldn’t play him. However, like the rest of us, I don’t know for certain.
the other way around it is you sign a player when you have transfer ban but set the transfer to take place the date your ban is lifted also putting in place that the club you are buying from loan that player to set club with a little fee going to that club. always ways around things 3-4 other clubs have used these types of methods A lot of clubs wont or cant do this only the big ones will take the risk.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 27 Jul 19 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Can I say as well that our pre-season is inadequate, for the players and the fans.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
elgrande bedford 27 Jul 19 12.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Can I say as well that our pre-season is inadequate, for the players and the fans. We are playing hertha Berlin next weekend.
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 27 Jul 19 12.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
We are playing hertha Berlin next weekend. Doesn't really seem much of a step up from Young Boys to me.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jacey 27 Jul 19 1.24pm | |
---|---|
Released many players,extended Wickham's contract,signed Ayew and the Forest goalie,himself considered surplus to requirements.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 27 Jul 19 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jacey
Released many players,extended Wickham's contract,signed Ayew and the Forest goalie,himself considered surplus to requirements. I think that if Wilf stays that's it for buying, couple of loans only
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 27 Jul 19 1.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
I think that if Wilf stays that's it for buying, couple of loans only We need a RB but we’ve been here before with no backup at LB. We need a scorer upfront but we’ve been here before. We know what happens from here if it stays like this & so will Parish, but he falls back on the January transfer window if we don’t get lucky with loans before or after the window shuts on August 10th. Not buying a RB is unacceptable although there were attempts to buy from a few approaches but they all extended at their clubs so we’ll see.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bexleydave Barnehurst 27 Jul 19 3.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by grumpymort
the other way around it is you sign a player when you have transfer ban but set the transfer to take place the date your ban is lifted also putting in place that the club you are buying from loan that player to set club with a little fee going to that club. always ways around things 3-4 other clubs have used these types of methods A lot of clubs wont or cant do this only the big ones will take the risk. I'm going to keep this simple. I've given you the chance to produce a single link to back up your assertions; you haven't or can't. I've said that I'm happy to admit I'm wrong if, during the current embargo, Chelsea do any kind of deal that you're suggesting. I'll just add that, if they don't, I'll expect you to crawl over broken glass and hot coals before gorging on the largest humble pie ever baked. That is my final word on the subject before the current window closes.
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.