This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Jack Wilshere (suggestion) (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Goldfiinger  Just down the road 20 Jun 18 11.19am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by slubglurge
Roy knows him and his character more than we do so i trust Roy to make the right decision ^^^ This Also agree with the other post that we’d need cover for him in case his injuries aren’t behind him. Imagine the Scottish lad or Jake Livermore would be providing cover / options. Imagine Cabaye will be departing along with RLC so two out. Two in please. Edited by Goldfiinger (20 Jun 2018 11.20am)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Jacey 25 Jun 18 11.33am |
|
|---|---|
|
Seems West Ham have offered Jack a one year deal,initially,in view of his history of injuries.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 25 Jun 18 12.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jacey
Seems West Ham have offered Jack a one year deal,initially,in view of his history of injuries. Wilshire won’t accept a one year deal.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 25 Jun 18 12.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Why not? A one year deal with a bumper signing on fee, and then he is a free agent in another year and free to negotiate another one year deal with a bumper signing on fee.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| se25 rudy se25 25 Jun 18 1.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dp
Why not? A one year deal with a bumper signing on fee, and then he is a free agent in another year and free to negotiate another one year deal with a bumper signing on fee. He might well have reservations about his own fitness and feel that if he breaks down again next season nobody will be foolish enough to risk even a 1 year contract in future. If so, he'll want a longer contract to guarantee he gets paid for a few years come what may.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The Dolphin 25 Jun 18 1.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I don't want him anyway.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pssguy  25 Jun 18 2.13pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dp
Why not? A one year deal with a bumper signing on fee, and then he is a free agent in another year and free to negotiate another one year deal with a bumper signing on fee. Maybe WHU were not offering such a bumper signing on fe for a 1 year deal. Unless you are involved in negotiations, it is all speculation
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 25 Jun 18 2.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by se25 rudy
He might well have reservations about his own fitness and feel that if he breaks down again next season nobody will be foolish enough to risk even a 1 year contract in future. If so, he'll want a longer contract to guarantee he gets paid for a few years come what may. Yes and any player can suffer a career ending tackle at any moment.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Painter Croydon 25 Jun 18 6.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Yes and any player can suffer a career ending tackle at any moment. Bolasie will never be the same player, after his injury.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 26 Jun 18 6.39am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by se25 rudy
He might well have reservations about his own fitness and feel that if he breaks down again next season nobody will be foolish enough to risk even a 1 year contract in future. If so, he'll want a longer contract to guarantee he gets paid for a few years come what may. Not sure about this. The specific point that I was reacting to was the notion that he would not sign a 1 year deal. I always thought that a long term deal is good business for clubs because it protects their ownership in the asset (I.e. the player), and for other amortisation reasons. However there is no fee for Wilshere, so there is no amortisation consideration. So what are West Ham gaining by offering a 1 year deal? I get the point about Wilshere’s fitness, but there is nothing over the last couple of seasons to suggest he is really that injury prone, he played 29 league games two seasons ago, and 38 games overall last season. So Wilshere could theoretically take the money from West Ham, have a stormer, and then move on after a year. Effectively it is a season long loan where Wilshere gets paid rather than Arsenal. All seems very odd.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 26 Jun 18 6.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by pssguy
Maybe WHU were not offering such a bumper signing on fe for a 1 year deal. Unless you are involved in negotiations, it is all speculation Then it would be the signing on fee that he would be objecting to, not the 1 year deal. I agree that it is all speculation, as was the original statement that Wilshere would not sign a 1 year deal.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| manwitheagletattoo Somewhere in England 26 Jun 18 7.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
Why not give Wilshere the reported 5m signing on fee. A contract made up of lower wage over the three years but appearances related with a bonuses package, goals scored, top ten finish, trophy win etc. This would be an incentive to Wilshere and give Palace guarantees of performance. Hodgson has got Townsend playing his best football since signing for Palace I can’t see why he could do the same with Wilshere .
South London & Proud |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.