I used to work in Saudi Arabia and I wasn't corrupt nor were any of those whom I worked with.

I'm not going to get involved in any disingenuous line of questioning presented as badinage.

You are clearly doing your Jeremy Paxman impression.

I have provided a number of answers to genuine questions.

Edited by Willo (20 Nov 2017 4.59pm)

always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

I'll tell you what the problem with him is. Zero empathy.

It would be all very well making the case for why a ref did this, or that, or made such and such a mistake, although the case we're discussing here is a particularly outrageous one and there is the whole game to consider in which he was awful throughout, not just the one incident.

But the thing about Willo is he exibhits no consideration whatsoever for the feelings of Palace fans who are aggrieved by what they more than reasonably see as a ghastly injustice. As has been pointed out, with even a half-reasonable ref performance and notwithstanding the sloppy equaliser we win that game at a canter. We are all understandably well pi**ed off at being robbed by a series of wrong decisions that all went one way.

Except Willo.

Willo is sitting there smugly telling us we are all wrong, that referees do a good job considering, that the odd error is understandable (and this was not "the odd error", BTW), he knows better than all of us and our feelings are unreasonable.

That would be irritating from an away fan, but for someone who purports to support the same team as the rest of us it's just baffling.

It's not as if he's said he feels pi**ed off, frustrated, or even disappointed, is it? In fact he doesn't seem to *feel* anything at all.

And he has no other point of view other than that of the man in black.

Edited by chateauferret (20 Nov 2017 6.27pm)

============
The Ferret
============

According to the Times Mark Clattenberg has stated that Niase dived and it wasn't a penalty.

What say you now Willo??

Conjunctivitis.com - A site for sore eyes.