You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Gareth Thomas Documentary – Alfie v Homophobia – T
November 25 2024 11.50pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Gareth Thomas Documentary – Alfie v Homophobia – T

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 15 of 42 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

  

Mapletree Flag Croydon 30 Jul 17 4.25pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by becky

Has anyone ever considered that there may be no openly gay footballers in the Premier league because, well...... non of them are actually gay?

Or maybe if they are gay they don't considerate anyone else's business?

Statistically, there should be a number of gay players, but statistics are no more than that - average expected figures.

To put it mildly that is stretching the bounds of credibility Becky.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
becky Flag over the moon 30 Jul 17 4.29pm Send a Private Message to becky Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add becky as a friend

Originally posted by Mapletree

To put it mildly that is stretching the bounds of credibility Becky.

Is it?

How many professional footballers have ever come out (before, during or after their careers)? Fashanu was one, but any others?

How many professional rugby players (apart from Gareth Thomas) likewise?

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
the.universal 30 Jul 17 4.34pm Send a Private Message to the.universal Add the.universal as a friend

Originally posted by becky

Is it?

How many professional footballers have ever come out (before, during or after their careers)? Fashanu was one, but any others?

How many professional rugby players (apart from Gareth Thomas) likewise?

Yes it is

 


Vive le Roy!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 30 Jul 17 5.00pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by the.universal

Yes it is

Not until one comes out it isn't... clearly, as theres no proof that there are

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
the.universal 30 Jul 17 5.11pm Send a Private Message to the.universal Add the.universal as a friend

Originally posted by Lyons550

Not until one comes out it isn't... clearly, as theres no proof that there are

You're in denial if you even contemplate that argument

 


Vive le Roy!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goldfiinger Flag Just down the road 30 Jul 17 5.12pm Send a Private Message to Goldfiinger Add Goldfiinger as a friend

Hey guys freedom of speach is great but it doesn't mean you have the right to torment other people becuase that generally then falls under hate speach.

Feel free to look it up [Link]

End of the day everyone should be able to have a debate and be free to discuss their ideas and thoughts. That doesn't mean you are free to bully, slander or torment others who live their life different to you just becuase you don't accept them. That then becomes hate speach and not free speach.

For anyone who thinks clamping down on hate speach impeads people's free speach im afraid your missing the mark.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Park Road Flag 30 Jul 17 5.31pm

Let's move on. The season starts shortly and things look unusually positive.
Documentaries by gay Welsh rugby players come and go. Opinions vary.

We're all in it together.

So come and join with me and sing.

We hate Brighton and we hate Brighton.

Brightonaphobia at its best.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jul 17 6.31pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Wilesy01

In regards to the hol I admit to being slightly embarrassed. I glanced at the GT thread a few weeks back and noticed some offensive posts but these were indeed outbalanced by fans uncomfortable with the idiotic chanting we make when we play Brighton. Those banned who made these vile statements deserve the bans given whether it was made then or now, surely we can differentiate between freedom of speech and bigotry?

As a final point what about the global game and homophobia? There's a World Cup in Russia next year where (correct me if I'm wrong) being gay is a crime. What sort of message does that give about football and equality? Not to mention the issues they also have with racism in their domestic league. It beggars belief.

For me your attitude towards what should be banned is a dangerous one. I agree with you about the unpleasantness of anti homosexual sentiment that you occasionally get from wallies or groups of wallies in the crowd.....But your frustration that people believe different things to you is one thing....Supporting action against chants is a step too far....I'm not sure what you want this guy to do otherwise.

'Those banned who made these vile statements deserve the bans given whether it was made then or now, surely we can differentiate between freedom of speech and bigotry?'

I take issue with this. How on earth did we get to a stage where if someone's being a 'bigot' (a highly subjective view of course) means that they should be banned? I read views I don't like on Hol all the time. I don't believe in banning people who express them. I take serious issue with this idea that people aren't allowed to dislike something and can't be debated without the fear that someone's going to ban them. I agree that everyone should conduct myself properly but, outside of not supporting or accepting violence against people, I take serious issue with people being controlled to fit an accepted worldview.

I don't believe in 'protecting' one group anymore than any other group. I believe in fairly protecting everybody. I agree that providing opportunities to talented people not born with the right connections has merit but I'm also wary about how this has been used.

Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Jul 2017 7.04pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jul 17 6.40pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Goldfiinger

Hey guys freedom of speach is great but it doesn't mean you have the right to torment other people becuase that generally then falls under hate speach.

Feel free to look it up [Link]

End of the day everyone should be able to have a debate and be free to discuss their ideas and thoughts. That doesn't mean you are free to bully, slander or torment others who live their life different to you just becuase you don't accept them. That then becomes hate speach and not free speach.

For anyone who thinks clamping down on hate speach impeads people's free speach im afraid your missing the mark.

The American constitution is a far better one on freedom of speech and expression. May introduced those 'hate' speech laws mainly so that she had tools to deal with extremists.

It isn't meant to close down people who don't like the things you believe in.....Look at what Katie Hopkins says...Look at what her opponents try against her every day. But of course...idealists who want to shut people up think 'hate speech' is whatever they are against.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jul 17 6.49pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

According to the last reliable poll taken on people with sexualities where they haven't selected heterosexual....It's about one in twenty.

I suspect it's higher...more like one in fifteen....I also suspect that within that hetrosexual group a fair percentage have had sexual experiences...consensual or not...that weren't heterosexual.

It doesn't necessarily make them homosexual but it just highlights the reality that sexuality is to a certain extent nebulous to a percentage of people.

So there is probably at least one or two homosexual or bisexual players in every squad.

They have a right to privacy or a right to expression. If they choose expression I expect the vast majority will not consider it a big deal.....However initially it would provide a section of the opposition fans something else to be abusive about. But over time this gets old even for them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Jul 2017 6.50pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Username Flag Horsham 30 Jul 17 7.07pm Send a Private Message to Username Add Username as a friend

Originally posted by becky

Is it?

How many professional footballers have ever come out (before, during or after their careers)? Fashanu was one, but any others?

How many professional rugby players (apart from Gareth Thomas) likewise?

Isn't that the exact point? It's an environment that makes it incredibly hard to come out.

1.7% of the population in the UK identify as LBGT.

If you estimate each of the 92 clubs has a squad of 30, that's 2760 professionals across the four divisions. That means there would be statistically 46 gay professional right now, and if you take that back 20 years or so?

You really think it's just a statistical quirk that only two players have come out (Robbie Rogers being the other)?

 


Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wilesy01 Flag Bristol 30 Jul 17 7.07pm Send a Private Message to Wilesy01 Add Wilesy01 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

For me your attitude towards what should be banned is a dangerous one. I agree with you about the unpleasantness of anti homosexual sentiment that you occasionally get from wallies or groups of wallies in the crowd.....But your frustration that people believe different things to you is one thing....Supporting action against chants is a step too far....I'm not sure what you want this guy to do otherwise.

'Those banned who made these vile statements deserve the bans given whether it was made then or now, surely we can differentiate between freedom of speech and bigotry?'

I take issue with this. How on earth did we get to a stage where if someone's being a 'bigot' (a highly subjective view of course) that they should be banned. I read views I don't like on Hol all the time. I don't believe in banning people who express them. I take serious issue with this idea that people aren't allowed to dislike something and can't be debated without the fear that someone's going to ban them. I agree that everyone should conduct myself properly but, outside of not supporting or accepting violence against people, I take serious issue with people being controlled to fit an accepted worldview.


Edited by Stirlingsays (30 Jul 2017 6.33pm)

I absolutely agree we can't and shouldn't create so called safe spaces (not least on here!) so that people are shielded from particular opinions but I suppose the point I'm trying to make is why are we trying to normalise homophobia any more so than any other type of discrimination?

If we were to substitute the subject matter of GT's doc to say, racism and the response garnered on here from a select few drew nasty responses I'd wager the offenders would hounded out post haste. Alongside this if us as fans made racist chants at opposition players and/or fans I'd think we'd play behind closed doors and face massive financial sanctions as a result.

So why should this level of abuse be acceptable/tolerable when it comes to the LGBT community? GT made this point in the doc and he's got every right to make it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 15 of 42 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Gareth Thomas Documentary – Alfie v Homophobia – T