You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > The Steve Parish thread
November 24 2024 1.26pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Steve Parish thread

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 15 of 32 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

  

Goldfiinger Flag Just down the road 02 Mar 18 10.07pm Send a Private Message to Goldfiinger Add Goldfiinger as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1

Bolasie wanted to go.Sold him for good money and purchased Tomkins,Townsend And Benteke.
Again good management.
Cannot see what your continually moaning about.

Townsend was bought from Newcastle in exchange for Gayle and £3m. Good management IMO

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Goldfiinger Flag Just down the road 02 Mar 18 10.09pm Send a Private Message to Goldfiinger Add Goldfiinger as a friend

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

Roy does what - Know good business do you mean? Who knows how far he was even consulted regarding the latest transfers

Well the Sørloth transfer has Roys finger prints all over it. I believe he even said he pushed for it...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 03 Mar 18 5.58am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by southnorwoodhill

Roy does what - Know good business do you mean? Who knows how far he was even consulted regarding the latest transfers

Sorry, Roy clearly knows we did not do good business during the window - from interviews during and then after - when to me he looked thoroughly underwhelmed.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 03 Mar 18 11.14am Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle Add braunstoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by TheExpatEagle

I'm baffled why so many people are crediting Parish for spending money on Benteke when he sold Bolasie to fund it.

It's not like he dug deep to find the money. The PL pays us over £80m a year and the summer we signed Benteke we spent £11m net on transfers.

the PL give us £80m a year...its not a lot & basic maths tell us pretty much all of it goes on player wages.

thats why we have to balance the books somehow.

in PL terms we are a small club with comparitivly a tiny income

the last 3 transfer windows have all been reactive rather than proactive signings & untill we get a long term manager in place i cant see this changing.

we seem to be (just about) in a sustainable situation whilst we remain the the top flight, but we really do need to turn the dial back somewhat and use academy players in the squad rather than players earning in excess of 50k a week to warm the bench.

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 03 Mar 18 11.58am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

the PL give us £80m a year...its not a lot & basic maths tell us pretty much all of it goes on player wages.

thats why we have to balance the books somehow.

in PL terms we are a small club with comparitivly a tiny income

the last 3 transfer windows have all been reactive rather than proactive signings & untill we get a long term manager in place i cant see this changing.

we seem to be (just about) in a sustainable situation whilst we remain the the top flight, but we really do need to turn the dial back somewhat and use academy players in the squad rather than players earning in excess of 50k a week to warm the bench.


IMO this is the secret to being successful as a small club. If you nail the academy you are bringing players through who can be sold if needs be to balance the books. Reactive signings keep you up but you end up fire fighting all the time. If we could produce one Wilf standard player a season it would make a massive difference to the club.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnmcormick8 Flag Brundish 03 Mar 18 1.06pm Send a Private Message to johnmcormick8 Add johnmcormick8 as a friend

aye

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

the PL give us £80m a year...its not a lot & basic maths tell us pretty much all of it goes on player wages.

thats why we have to balance the books somehow.

in PL terms we are a small club with comparitivly a tiny income

the last 3 transfer windows have all been reactive rather than proactive signings & untill we get a long term manager in place i cant see this changing.

we seem to be (just about) in a sustainable situation whilst we remain the the top flight, but we really do need to turn the dial back somewhat and use academy players in the squad rather than players earning in excess of 50k a week to warm the bench.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 03 Mar 18 1.15pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops


IMO this is the secret to being successful as a small club. If you nail the academy you are bringing players through who can be sold if needs be to balance the books. Reactive signings keep you up but you end up fire fighting all the time. If we could produce one Wilf standard player a season it would make a massive difference to the club.

Producing one Wilf standard player a season is unrealistic. When has any club ever done that in recent times?

One obvious answer is better scouting. The Palace scouting outside of the prem and championship has been almost non existent until recently. Until recently we only signed Souare and Luca who've never played in England and I bet Pardew got wind of Souare while at Newcastle. We weren't sure enough on Rincon or Tosun. Whether they will or would've come good isn't really the point. We dipped our toes in not being very sure and closed the door.

It's damaging to English players but inevitable without rules to prevent this being advantageous.

Incidentally with a grade B academy training at goals (and the local fools objecting to larger field of training pitches which may result in more housing) I don't see a conveyor belt of talent being developed any time soon.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 03 Mar 18 1.42pm Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle Add braunstoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Producing one Wilf standard player a season is unrealistic. When has any club ever done that in recent times?

One obvious answer is better scouting. The Palace scouting outside of the prem and championship has been almost non existent until recently. Until recently we only signed Souare and Luca who've never played in England and I bet Pardew got wind of Souare while at Newcastle. We weren't sure enough on Rincon or Tosun. Whether they will or would've come good isn't really the point. We dipped our toes in not being very sure and closed the door.

It's damaging to English players but inevitable without rules to prevent this being advantageous.

Incidentally with a grade B academy training at goals (and the local fools objecting to larger field of training pitches which may result in more housing) I don't see a conveyor belt of talent being developed any time soon.

of course its unrealistic, though what i dont feel is unrealistic is being able to produce players able of having a similar impact as squad players that could do the jobs of chungy / sako / much / pva / schlupp on 10% of the wages with no fee.

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 03 Mar 18 2.00pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

of course its unrealistic, though what i dont feel is unrealistic is being able to produce players able of having a similar impact as squad players that could do the jobs of chungy / sako / much / pva / schlupp on 10% of the wages with no fee.

Of course, because 2 of those offer nothing. Full back is not a bad position for someone to be under less pressure.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Aray Flag South London 03 Mar 18 2.32pm Send a Private Message to Aray Add Aray as a friend

Originally posted by TheExpatEagle

Sold Bolasie to fund the Benteke transfer. We're only a 'non-selling' club because of the money around and that Parish isn't on his own, which previous chairmen are.

And he is still trying his best to cock it up.

Talk about revising history. Everyone - well almost everyone thought we got top dollar for Yala. And he wanted to go. We needed a proper striker and we got one - he's since forgotten how to do that but that is another thread.

And as for the rest of this nonsense. The only reason we're not a selling club is because the chairman and owners are trying to build it up rather than earn as much dosh as poss. Plenty of clubs have tried to get Wilf.

And the fact that the chairman isn't on his own is because of the consortium he was part of that purchased the club. You're not being entirely logical - are you?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
braunstoneagle Flag the middle of bumf*** nowhere... 03 Mar 18 2.43pm Send a Private Message to braunstoneagle Add braunstoneagle as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Of course, because 2 of those offer nothing. Full back is not a bad position for someone to be under less pressure.

my point being i bet those 5 players earn over £10m a year combined.

thats a shed load of cash that could be put to better use elsewhere in the operation

 


‘Football isn’t instant coffee. You have to work at it. You must grow the bean, grind it.’ Ian Holloway


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 03 Mar 18 5.01pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

there have been mistakes ,but you have to put things into context. The last top flight season we went through without having been a genuine relegation candidate at some point was 1991-92. We've spent proper money - esp last Jan, managers have been backed by SP - we've got an unbalanced squad with some sick notes, flops and prima donnas on too high wages, and we're not improving raw talent enough - but we're in the prem for a record fifth season with a stadium improvement which will transform the club and have a manager who has managed England, Liverpool and Inter - expectations have been raised and Parrish needs to change our model from fire-fighting to building, but any criticism he gets must be tempered with the achievements he has made so far and the investment which has come in, which has been massive by our usual standards - look at Ipswich, Hull, Sunderland ... things could be a lot worse. I don't think we'll go down, but I reckon Roy will stay if we do and he'll turn us into a lean machine post Zaha (hopefully he can do that in the prem) - and that is a serious consideration - because we are not a good side without him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 15 of 32 < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > The Steve Parish thread