You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 1 2024 3.31am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

ukip (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 146 of 311 < 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 >

Topic Locked

Johnny Eagles Flag berlin 09 Dec 14 8.46am Send a Private Message to Johnny Eagles Add Johnny Eagles as a friend

There was a detailed interview on "Westminster Hour" with two polling experts who have done studies using samples of 90,000 people into voting intentions.

The overwhelming motivation for people who say they will vote UKIP is not fear but disillusion with the three main parties. The majority of UKIP voters are not deserting another party; most of them haven't been voting at all.

 


...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
We are goin up! Flag Coulsdon 09 Dec 14 9.00am Send a Private Message to We are goin up! Add We are goin up! as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 09 Dec 2014 7.39am

[Link]

Oh dear.


Would.

 


The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Pawson Palace Flag Croydon 09 Dec 14 9.23am Send a Private Message to Pawson Palace Add Pawson Palace as a friend

Quote We are goin up! at 09 Dec 2014 9.00am

Quote nickgusset at 09 Dec 2014 7.39am

[Link]

Oh dear.


Would.

Plough.

 


Pride of South London
Upper Holmesdale Block P

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Hoof Hearted 09 Dec 14 10.39am

Quote The White Horse at 08 Dec 2014 5.47pm

Hoof, I'll keep it simple (upon your request):

Given Bristol West contains at least 1 ward heavily populated by Asians, why did UKIP get just 1.2% of the vote there in 2010?

Even if everyone who wasn't white refused to vote UKIP, the highest possible fraction of white voters voting UKIP was 1 in 70.


I don't know mate... I'm more confused as to why Easton is in Bristol West when it is 2 miles from my house in Stapleton which is North East of Bristol?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
OknotOK Flag Cockfosters, London 09 Dec 14 10.44am Send a Private Message to OknotOK Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add OknotOK as a friend

Quote Johnny Eagles at 09 Dec 2014 8.46am

There was a detailed interview on "Westminster Hour" with two polling experts who have done studies using samples of 90,000 people into voting intentions.

The overwhelming motivation for people who say they will vote UKIP is not fear but disillusion with the three main parties. The majority of UKIP voters are not deserting another party; most of them haven't been voting at all.

You would think people disillusioned with the three main parties would have been voting previously?

But the rise of anti-establishment candidates and parties is a recognised phenomenon. And UKIP obviously benefit from it. As it would appear are the Greens and the SNP.

The SNP holding the balance of power at Westminster would be intriguing as they currently don't vote on any English only issues. So it would lead to the situation Labour was worried about with regards to voting reform anyway - whereby their coalition could be stable and secure when voting on national policy but they could lose every vote related to non-national policies.

 


"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
sanitycheck Flag 09 Dec 14 10.44am

Quote Johnny Eagles at 09 Dec 2014 8.46am

There was a detailed interview on "Westminster Hour" with two polling experts who have done studies using samples of 90,000 people into voting intentions.

The overwhelming motivation for people who say they will vote UKIP is not fear but disillusion with the three main parties. The majority of UKIP voters are not deserting another party; most of them haven't been voting at all.

So most people intending to vote for UKIP didn't vote in previous elections? I'd like to see the study as that sounds like either a very bold claim or a very interesting finding.

That aside, saying that those voters are motivated by disillusion and not fear is obviously an extreme simplification of the human condition. People are motivated by all kinds of complex factors and handing them a survey isn't going to draw out some kind of truth.

Edited by sanitycheck (09 Dec 2014 11.01am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Johnny Eagles Flag berlin 09 Dec 14 10.52am Send a Private Message to Johnny Eagles Add Johnny Eagles as a friend

Quote sanitycheck at 09 Dec 2014 10.44am

Quote Johnny Eagles at 09 Dec 2014 8.46am

There was a detailed interview on "Westminster Hour" with two polling experts who have done studies using samples of 90,000 people into voting intentions.

The overwhelming motivation for people who say they will vote UKIP is not fear but disillusion with the three main parties. The majority of UKIP voters are not deserting another party; most of them haven't been voting at all.

So most people intending to vote for UKIP didn't vote in previous elections? I'd like to see the study as that sounds like either a very bold claim or a very interesting finding.

That aside, saying that those voters are motivated by disillusion and not fear is obviously an extreme simplification of the human condition. People are motivated by all kinds of complex factors and handing them a survey isn't going to draw out some kind of truth.

Edited by sanitycheck (09 Dec 2014 10.48am)

[Link]

The relevant clip from the programme.

The discussion was about who would win how many seats.

As far as I recall they reckon:

- Labour will do better than last time in England but will get destroyed in Jockland by the Ess n' Peeee

- Lib Dems will not get destroyed thanks to a) incumbency and b) their opponents in marginals not doing that well

- The Greens will come nowhere because all their voters will go back to Labour

- UKIP will damage Tories most, Labour a bit, but not as much as people expect because mostly their votes will come from previous non-voters


As for your second paragraph, I don't really know how to respond to that.

I was just providing evidence for an additional and more significant factor (disillusion with the political elite) in response to Seth's assertion (forgive the paraphrasing, Seth) that it was all about fear.

Obviously people are motivated by all kinds of complex factors. On the same programme last week there was a review of this book which talks about the primitive and emotional factors which drive voting behaviour.

[Link]

You seem keen to paint me as some kind of simpleton who argues in black and white terms. I think that's unfair.


Edited by Johnny Eagles (09 Dec 2014 11.05am)

 


...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Johnny Eagles Flag berlin 09 Dec 14 11.04am Send a Private Message to Johnny Eagles Add Johnny Eagles as a friend

nnnnngggh

more double posting


Edited by Johnny Eagles (09 Dec 2014 11.04am)

 


...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
susmik Flag PLYMOUTH -But Made in Old Coulsdon... 09 Dec 14 11.31am Send a Private Message to susmik Add susmik as a friend

Quote sanitycheck at 09 Dec 2014 10.44am

Quote Johnny Eagles at 09 Dec 2014 8.46am

There was a detailed interview on "Westminster Hour" with two polling experts who have done studies using samples of 90,000 people into voting intentions.

The overwhelming motivation for people who say they will vote UKIP is not fear but disillusion with the three main parties. The majority of UKIP voters are not deserting another party; most of them haven't been voting at all.

So most people intending to vote for UKIP didn't vote in previous elections? I'd like to see the study as that sounds like either a very bold claim or a very interesting finding.

That aside, saying that those voters are motivated by disillusion and not fear is obviously an extreme simplification of the human condition. People are motivated by all kinds of complex factors and handing them a survey isn't going to draw out some kind of truth.

Edited by sanitycheck (09 Dec 2014 11.01am)

I personally think that quite a few UKIP voters do so to give the major parties a good kick up the backside in the hope that things will change for the better. Politics is a funny thing as is Religion. I was always told "Do not argue about Politics or Religion as there is no ONE answer on either subject!

 


Supported Palace for over 69 years since the age of 7 and have seen all the ups and downs and will probably see many more ups and downs before I go up to the big football club in the sky.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 09 Dec 14 11.39am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

UKIP is many things to many men it appears and not a club I particularly want to be in with some fans like Nick Griffin hopping aboard. Kinda tells us the direction in which they are probably going. The wrong one.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
sanitycheck Flag 09 Dec 14 12.31pm

Quote Johnny Eagles at 09 Dec 2014 10.52am

You seem keen to paint me as some kind of simpleton who argues in black and white terms. I think that's unfair.


Edited by Johnny Eagles (09 Dec 2014 11.05am)

It just stood out to me in this thread the number of times you reduced things to arbitrary either/or choices.

I don't think you or anyone else here is a simpleton, nor would I ever say that. It's not like you kept calling me a dimwit in this thread or anything . That's your opinion though of course and you're welcome to it.

I'll watch the video in a bit .

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Johnny Eagles Flag berlin 09 Dec 14 12.52pm Send a Private Message to Johnny Eagles Add Johnny Eagles as a friend

Quote sanitycheck at 09 Dec 2014 12.31pm

Quote Johnny Eagles at 09 Dec 2014 10.52am

You seem keen to paint me as some kind of simpleton who argues in black and white terms. I think that's unfair.


Edited by Johnny Eagles (09 Dec 2014 11.05am)

It just stood out to me in this thread the number of times you reduced things to arbitrary either/or choices.

I don't think you or anyone else here is a simpleton, nor would I ever say that. It's not like you kept calling me a dimwit in this thread or anything . That's your opinion though of course and you're welcome to it.

I'll watch the video in a bit .


1. I think you mean the Russell Brand thread, not this one.

2. I didn't reduce anything to either / or choices. I provided criteria by which you can judge whether someone has a platform (eg, a twitter feed read by 8.6m twits) or not (eg, an angry blog read by Gusset and a half dozen of his loony mates).

3. I said I thought you might be rather dim, because you seemed to mix up my proposed criteria with what you kept calling a "binary view". Admittedly this was provocative. I hope there are no hard feelings.

4. It's a radio clip, not a video.


Edited by Johnny Eagles (09 Dec 2014 12.55pm)

 


...we must expand...get more pupils...so that the knowledge will spread...

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 146 of 311 < 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic