This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
dannyboy1978 03 Mar 20 4.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You didn't answer my question, I asked how you define these people who are child rapists. What community do they belong to?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cpfc_chap koh samui 03 Mar 20 6.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
You didn't answer my question, I asked how you define these people who are child rapists. What community do they belong to? He did, he put them in the criminal community!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 03 Mar 20 7.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I keep hearing this but it is not about that at all. People have wanted to confront Islam for centuries but it's still flourishing. To suggest it is the "root cause" of the problem is to offer a very simplistic analysis which leads us no-where. It's the interpretation of some parts of the Islamic faith by some Muslims which appear to be the problem. Not all and not everywhere. Look, for instance, at Islam in Malaysia. Suggesting that people are using their religion as an excuse for crime fails to understand indoctrination. This is about adhering to a set of cultural and religious ideas that supersede the local law and accepted morality for personal indulgence. The only thing I am defending is common sense and using it to the benefit of the majority, but especially to the victims of these despicable criminals. Trying to understand indoctrination is vital as is working alongside the vast majority within our Muslim communities who want to stamp it out as much as everyone else. Anyone who fails to adhere to our laws and morality, for whatever reasons, deserve to be apprehended and punished until they comply. No compromises. This is not serving the majority, it is favouring the needs of the few because of some idealistic notion about equality. The needs of potential victims should be prioritised over ideology. It has nothing at all to do with equality or ideology. It only has to do with what will actually deliver the right answers fast enough. It is because people maintained your stance that this situation was allowed to go unchallenged for so long and on so many occasions. That's simply untrue. My "stance" has never been tried! Ever since these problems emerged these criminals have been described as "Islamic" or "Muslim" thereby stigmatising many other perfectly decent people and potentially dividing them from us, even to the point of ostracisation. As I see no upside at all to using this language why continue to do so?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 03 Mar 20 8.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Is it not possible though that Islam, both through its proclamations about women being required to act 'modestly' along with its emphasis on creating the notion of the 'other' through its notions of Kuffir does act as a way of these men's behaviour being justified? I have never studied Islam but others seem to think that what you say is one of the interpretations that some followers of the religion are encouraged to believe. The key word though is "some". We need to show everyone that in our country our laws and standards apply to all and those who accept them, whatever their personal faith, will be able to lead full and happy lives. Those that don't, for whatever reason but including interpretations of faith, must face the law until they do. That essentially these girls, through lifestyle choices, essentially asked for it? And that since they are non-Muslims, easier to write off as being lesser than? Anyone, for whatever reasons, who decide such things need to be detected and punished. Religious belief needs to be disregarded and won't appear on any charge sheet. Excuses are not justifications. This idea of organised grooming gangs are not predominately Muslim just by off chance are they? Or is it just one of those odd coincidences that we should just brush off and ignore? That this seems likely to be true is not the point. It may well be how the authorities get to grips with the underlying issues to devise their strategies to eradicate the crimes but to assist them to do so we need to get the Islamic communities on our side and fighting this battle with us. Stigmatising them all is not the way to do that. Now I believe that these grooming scandals were allowed to continue unchecked for decades because essentially Labour run councils, along with a leadership cadre of both the Police and Social services were willing to trade both electoral advantage and career advancement for this to continue unchallenged and in many cases, actively colluded with the miscreants. I have no comment to make on that because I don't have any detailed knowledge of it's truth. It has though nothing to do with the issue I have raised. But Islam provided the wider framework around the group mentality to arise that justified it in the first place. These girls were considered lesser than by all parties involved. A terrible collusion of both left-wing identity dogma allied with a religion that does see non-believers and especially women who do not confirm to its moral standards as fair game. That's an assertion that cannot be true. It might well be found that certain clerics have been preaching in ways that have led some to believe such things and if so we need to find them, hold them responsible and punish them. It cannot though be true of the whole of Islam.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 03 Mar 20 8.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You assume everyone will think these grooming gangs are an example of all muslims or islam followers.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 03 Mar 20 8.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Exactly. This is about the delusion of moral and religious superiority justifying acts against young Western women seen as lower forms of life by men whose culture restricts promiscuity with their own kind. Which has nothing at all to do with the point I have raised.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 03 Mar 20 8.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Which has nothing at all to do with the point I have raised. But are the reasons you give not to mention their race ,colour or religious preference
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 03 Mar 20 9.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cpfc_chap
He did, he put them in the criminal community! The definition of community So what is this common culture of these child rapists.? Or are the lefties still going to ignor the bleeding obvious
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 03 Mar 20 10.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
The definition of community So what is this common culture of these child rapists.? Or are the lefties still going to ignor the bleeding obvious It has sweet fa to do anything "left" or indeed "right"! The "common culture" of these child rapists seems to be that they are groups of evil men using a perverted interpretation of a religious belief to justify to themselves actions which are totally against the law. The law needs to assert itself as it does against all criminals.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 03 Mar 20 10.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It has sweet fa to do anything "left" or indeed "right"! The "common culture" of these child rapists seems to be that they are groups of evil men using a perverted interpretation of a religious belief to justify to themselves actions which are totally against the law. The law needs to assert itself as it does against all criminals. James O'Brien is in the house.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 03 Mar 20 11.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It has sweet fa to do anything "left" or indeed "right"! The "common culture" of these child rapists seems to be that they are groups of evil men using a perverted interpretation of a religious belief to justify to themselves actions which are totally against the law. The law needs to assert itself as it does against all criminals. The common culture is that they are Muslim and either from pakistan or are of pakistan origin. Just like all the other gangs of mass child rapists.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 03 Mar 20 11.28pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.