This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Badger11 Beckenham 23 Feb 24 12.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I don't think it's true that people haven't commented on nor care about what is happening in that land space. Opinions about this are of course fine either way. However, personally I don't think a 'deaths threats' are just 'part and parcel' attitude is particularly healthy myself....then again these are the realities of mass immigration that most of these people voted for anyway. However, the parliament is the voters, they pay for it. They pay the wages of those attending it. They have a say in who sits in it. Hence it is far more their concern than what goes on between foreigners in the middle east. Events they can't affect anyway. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Feb 2024 11.39am) Agreed. I rarely comment on the conflict itself because I don't have the knowledge or expertise and more importantly I don't have any solutions, neither does any else from what I can see. It is a tragedy unfortunately there is a lot of that about in this world of ours. However as the poster above says the issue with the Speaker does resonate i thought we had seen the last of biased Speakers sadly I think not. Hoyle should have allowed the SNP to have their way as it is their day. He could have allowed Labour an emergency debate the following day where they could have tabled their motions. Labour could then have abstained on the SNP motion making the point they would vote on their own one tomorrow.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 23 Feb 24 12.10pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
I think the issue is - in answer to your last paragraph - is that the parliamentary mayhem affects us, the British electorate; the Gaza situation is not something which we have control over. If the UK government voted for an immediate ceasefire do you think that either the Israelis or the protesters would say “okay” and go home? Of course not, so why do we allow ourselves to be sucked into a debate that just causes further division within our multicultural society? We can be sympathetic to either or both sides in the conflict but it shouldn’t be taking up any time in our parliamentary process. A military ally of ours is currently committing a ‘plausible genocide’ and we’re just meant to crack on? It’s the most pressing concern for an enormous number of the electorate currently, and that should absolutely be reflected in Parliament. I don’t ever recall this being a view previously - we have been involved and involved ourselves in so many international conflicts, humanitarian causes and general issues around the world in my lifetime, but now we say it’s nothing to do with us? It seems very inconsistent.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Feb 24 12.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Agreed. I rarely comment on the conflict itself because I don't have the knowledge or expertise and more importantly I don't have any solutions, neither does any else from what I can see. It is a tragedy unfortunately there is a lot of that about in this world of ours. However as the poster above says the issue with the Speaker does resonate i thought we had seen the last of biased Speakers sadly I think not. Hoyle should have allowed the SNP to have their way as it is their day. He could have allowed Labour an emergency debate the following day where they could have tabled their motions. Labour could then have abstained on the SNP motion making the point they would vote on their own one tomorrow. Indeed, what he did was weak. I remember Betty Boothroyd I bet she wouldn't have done this.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 23 Feb 24 12.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Agreed. I rarely comment on the conflict itself because I don't have the knowledge or expertise and more importantly I don't have any solutions, neither does any else from what I can see. It is a tragedy unfortunately there is a lot of that about in this world of ours. However as the poster above says the issue with the Speaker does resonate i thought we had seen the last of biased Speakers sadly I think not. Hoyle should have allowed the SNP to have their way as it is their day. He could have allowed Labour an emergency debate the following day where they could have tabled their motions. Labour could then have abstained on the SNP motion making the point they would vote on their own one tomorrow. Fair enough - kudos for the explanation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 23 Feb 24 12.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
A military ally of ours is currently committing a ‘plausible genocide’ and we’re just meant to crack on? It’s the most pressing concern for an enormous number of the electorate currently, and that should absolutely be reflected in Parliament. I don’t ever recall this being a view previously - we have been involved and involved ourselves in so many international conflicts, humanitarian causes and general issues around the world in my lifetime, but now we say it’s nothing to do with us? It seems very inconsistent. Genuinely Israel just aren't that much of an ally to the UK anymore. It wouldn't be giving any secrets away by me to state that Saudi Arabia, for instance, amongst other Arab states are buying British equipment. In fact bombing the Yemen with it. Israel honestly buys more from India than the UK to put it into perspective. The Israel as allies thing is through the US these days. And, in this case, I suspect we will see Britain break ranks with the US on this one - if we haven't already - whether we like it or not.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 23 Feb 24 12.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
A military ally of ours is currently committing a ‘plausible genocide’ and we’re just meant to crack on? It’s the most pressing concern for an enormous number of the electorate currently, and that should absolutely be reflected in Parliament. I don’t ever recall this being a view previously - we have been involved and involved ourselves in so many international conflicts, humanitarian causes and general issues around the world in my lifetime, but now we say it’s nothing to do with us? It seems very inconsistent. I can only assume that you are financially comfortable enough not to be bothered by the cost of living crisis and therefore that aspect has been pushed off the top of the list of your concerns. I think most normal people are worried about how they are going to pay bills rather than two tribes killing each other several thousand miles away. But that is your view which I understand. Just because the uk government has got involved previously doesn’t mean that they always have to. The priority for the uk government is their own people.
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 23 Feb 24 12.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Indeed, what he did was weak. I remember Betty Boothroyd I bet she wouldn't have done this. She would have chinned Starmer and Sue Gray just for good measure. And then if the Tories had started gloating she would have threaten them with the same.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 23 Feb 24 1.21pm | |
---|---|
We need to stop worrying about Gaza and concern ourselves with the Islamist threat to our safely and democracy. It really makes the idea that the far right is a serious threat look utterly ridiculous. Where is Sadiq Kahn's disgust at the Hamas supporters threatening Parliament? No, he'd rather criticise Suella Braverman. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (23 Feb 2024 1.33pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 23 Feb 24 1.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
No, I completely agree, all religions were and...outside of the first world, still are maintained by the sword. Only Islam still does that wide scale in the modern world however. Not all religions are the same. Name me the the modern Christian nation that was 99 percent Christian? There aren't....So forgive me If I don't find this particular intervention somewhat annoying to have to make.
Often it was about political convenience.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 23 Feb 24 1.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
For years Tory politicians have been subjected to harassment, threats and abuse by the left. When this has been pointed out people either laugh, say they deserve it or claim that the Tory is lying. Well now Labour MPs are getting a dose of the same medicine and they don't like it. Turning up at people's homes in a threatening manner is not an acceptable form of protest. I remember the idiots outside Rees Moggs home when he was taking his children to school. He behaved impeccably most of us would have thumped the man who he started talking to his very young son in a disgusting manner. Politicians should be held to account for their decisions but bully boy tactics is not peaceful protest. seems most of the protesters were middle class white Waitrose types
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 23 Feb 24 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I seriously don't get this. The left make great play of how insignificant Britain is, how it isn't really a thing anyway. Look at how you yourself attacked Britain as opposed to the EU, saying that we are completely subservient. Yet when it comes to political tribalism suddenly you think we matter in the world. I put it to you Steely that the rather more honest take that it doesn't matter at all what we say regarding the middle east. The days when what we thought and said mattered were destroyed by both Labour and Conservatives in the 50s and 60s. Something you no doubt agreed with. All this amounts to little more than virtue signalling and to me I just regard it as hubris and thus embarrassing. Just as with all politicians, Israel only care about what their donors say. And even that only goes so far. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Feb 2024 10.07am) He supports river to sea and the wiping out of Israel, what do you expect
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Feb 24 1.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Often it was about political convenience. The strange death of Europe as it were. At least we aren't speaking German...no, but eventually it'll be some other language.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.