This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 15 Feb 19 5.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I can see you are struggling here Stirling Here is a little helping hand. The data I have seen on ethnicity and income is a bit dated but I can provide it as well if that helps pakistani and Bangladeshi people were over 3 times more likely than White British people to live in the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods in England pakistani and Bangladeshi people were also over 3 times more likely than White British people to live in the most income-deprived neighbourhoods, and pakistani people were more than twice as likely as White British people to live in the most employment-deprived areas Indian people were least likely to be living in both the most deprived 10% of neighbourhoods in England and the most employment-deprived neighbourhoods White British people were least likely to be living in the most income-deprived neighbourhoods of England
Attachment: stats.JPG (41.31Kb)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 15 Feb 19 6.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Fine, but you’re making a subtly different point there to win an argument Educational under performance is not exclusively caused by economic or social hardship and It’s therefore a bit of a stretch to say that because A then B. It’s less of a stretch with the other data, especially as your chart actually supports it - despite certain minorities being worse off than anyone else they still have better exam results than those above them, ie the white british. Your chart requires more assumptions to support it, the other data is far more fact based considering the question you’re trying to answer. Which was not ‘who performs worst in GCSE exams’ - note, no link to social or financial consideration as it’s not in the study. Having said all that what were the sample sizes. Could both be dross
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 15 Feb 19 6.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I believe I was answering this point: The bottom sector in British society are the poor working class whites. I see nothing here to do with eductional performance. I think you have gone on a ramble, sampling the beers again?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 15 Feb 19 7.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
The world economy is starting to slow down retail sales in the US have declined and China is also slowing down. But no doubt this is all the fault of Brexit. This is soooooo last year
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 15 Feb 19 7.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
Even more laughter - Germany one decimal point from being in a recession. When Germany sneezes the rest of the EU zone better stock up on some Vit C. Germany are in recession bud (as i posted a while ago).
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 15 Feb 19 8.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I believe I was answering this point: The bottom sector in British society are the poor working class whites. I see nothing here to do with eductional performance. I think you have gone on a ramble, sampling the beers again?
And I know the reasons why my statistics are how they are......In a sense arguing the toss with you playing 'my data is worse than your data' is kind of moot. The point that Momentum are full of awful people was good enough for me.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 15 Feb 19 9.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The point that Momentum are full of awful people was good enough for me. Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Feb 2019 8.06pm) On that we certainly agree I am sure they are well intentioned
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 15 Feb 19 9.22pm | |
---|---|
It's only Brighton supporters who we have to worry about.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 15 Feb 19 9.29pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Germany are in recession bud (as i posted a while ago). I know, I was replying to one of steels non sequiturs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 15 Feb 19 9.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by chris123
I know, I was replying to one of steels non sequiturs. Ah, soz bud
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ChuFukka 15 Feb 19 9.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Jobs lost as a result of Brexit or those job losses conveniently blamed on Brexit? You claim that house prices have been stagnant as if that's a bad thing and sterling may be weaker but that helps exporters as it makes our prices more competitive Just for clarification, this isn’t actually strictly true. It’s getting into the weeds of trade economics a little bit, but the Marshall-Lerner identity only holds in the long run. In the short run, weak Sterling will almost always increase the size of the deficit (look into the J-curve for an explanation of why). In the long run, the theory goes, the J completes and export value goes up - ceteris paribus. If, however, Sterling has depreciated because of (amongst other things) the anticipation of higher barriers in the future, the trade deficit might always be unambiguously worse. Not digging you out but this is a mistake that I keep seeing go uncorrected, even in supposedly well-informed discussions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
.TUX. 15 Feb 19 10.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ChuFukka
Just for clarification, this isn’t actually strictly true. It’s getting into the weeds of trade economics a little bit, but the Marshall-Lerner identity only holds in the long run. In the short run, weak Sterling will almost always increase the size of the deficit (look into the J-curve for an explanation of why). In the long run, the theory goes, the J completes and export value goes up - ceteris paribus. If, however, Sterling has depreciated because of (amongst other things) the anticipation of higher barriers in the future, the trade deficit might always be unambiguously worse. Not digging you out but this is a mistake that I keep seeing go uncorrected, even in supposedly well-informed discussions. .........it's a fiat currency ie worthless.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.