Other examples of social engineering would be the decades of anti-immigration rhetoric pumped out by tabloids resulting in a generation of people utterly obsessed by the topic. Or the decades of anti-EU rhetoric pumped out via the same platforms, and more recent questionable (at best) use of social media data by the leave campaign, which have resulted in Brexit.

80% were against Windrush at the time because they were 'socially engineered' to believe they were an inferior race and somehow genetically more criminal.

People were opposed to gay marriage because they were socially engineered (predominantly by the church) to believe it was sinful and disgusting.

The idea that these were somehow the 'original' views untainted by social engineering is just silly.

Other examples of social engineering would be the decades of anti-immigration rhetoric pumped out by tabloids resulting in a generation of people utterly obsessed by the topic. Or the decades of anti-EU rhetoric pumped out via the same platforms, and more recent questionable (at best) use of social media data by the leave campaign, which have resulted in Brexit.

80% were against Windrush at the time because they were 'socially engineered' to believe they were an inferior race and somehow genetically more criminal.

People were opposed to gay marriage because they were socially engineered (predominantly by the church) to believe it was sinful and disgusting.

The idea that these were somehow the 'original' views untainted by social engineering is just silly.

Other examples of social engineering would be the decades of anti-immigration rhetoric pumped out by tabloids resulting in a generation of people utterly obsessed by the topic. Or the decades of anti-EU rhetoric pumped out via the same platforms, and more recent questionable (at best) use of social media data by the leave campaign, which have resulted in Brexit.

80% were against Windrush at the time because they were 'socially engineered' to believe they were an inferior race and somehow genetically more criminal.

People were opposed to gay marriage because they were socially engineered (predominantly by the church) to believe it was sinful and disgusting.

The idea that these were somehow the 'original' views untainted by social engineering is just silly.

What you call 'social engineering' in terms of tribalism is in fact the natural state of human beings....You will find it within tribes that have never met the modern world.

One of the expressions of tribalism is you supporting a football team.....which is the same thing in an another form.

It's why borders exist....from your house to a nation's borders.

Being against immigration is an easily describable aspect of human nature. Even after decades of one way elite driven media indoctrination that natural tendency is still strong.

You have just been indoctrinated against certain natural aspects of tribalism while others were never challenged. That was probably your family culture and your genes will probably account for how easy that was to do.

The fact that you think these things exist as a kind of superior/inferior domain is just something your political ideology teaches you. Some people may think like that but for people like me it's not the point at all....nothing to do with it. There are highly intelligent people and retards within every race.

As for homosexuality, I think nature automatically has a bias.
You seem to think that a rejection of homosexuality started with the Church? Mmmmm...you need to read more history I think.

However, rather than go on about that I'll just say that there are quite understandable reasons why someone might think that homosexuality isn't good for societies that exist outside of a religion's thinking.....Otherwise the tendency against it within most cultures wouldn't exist.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Jul 2022 6.26pm)

Ah, so your position is the 'natural position' and anything else isn't. That's a slippery slope to frame any discussion.

To conflate the existence of tribalism (which is obviously true) with the suggestion that humans are naturally against immigration is quite funny.

And why did that 'propaganda' exist?

And by the way, no not really....mass media didn't exist in the form that would convince large numbers of people of ideas that wouldn't exist within natural human communities.

The evidence is that slavery was everywhere....in different cultures that had never met each other.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Jul 2022 6.46pm)