They are 100% assertions, because allegations are being made about motivations and assumptions made about terms of reference.

Any worst case scenario is very likely to be very wrong. Methodologies used during a rapidly evolving situation are likely to later be shown to be imperfect.

If you are the go to source to answer the “what’s the absolutely worst possible outcome“ question, then you are likely to be on the receiving end of later criticism.

The government acted, not Ferguson. He, along with others, advised. That was then. This is now.

Campbell is actively misleading and misrepresenting a huge number of people and causing them to doubt the work of science. This is now.

With all due respect you should be interested. He may not be advising government but he is advising a huge number of people not to trust government. With misinformation!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

He has changed his tune.

Because of people like you. He saw riches beyond his wildest dreams laid out before him. All he had to do was change direction and feed their biases.

He has been very clever. Lost his integrity but got rich. You not so clever.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

This isn’t the first time you have made these silly assertions.

Very few people will only have Covid on their death certificate. Almost everyone will have died with Covid but because of an underlying cause. Something they were living with until the stress of Covid tipped them over the edge.

The fact that you reference the full blown nutcase David Icke referring to deaths in Cornwall which refers to a hospital where my wife works and did during the height of the crisis is instructive. Many more deaths than 4 occurred there on a weekly basis which were Covid related and would not have occurred without it.

As I explained to you before this was a methodology used to track trends and not absolutes. If were living with a heart condition, caught Covid and died, then it was the Covid that was responsible. You would still though see the heart condition on the death certificate.

You may think a 99% survival rate means something can be ignored. I think a 1% death rate cannot be.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It’s not up to you or me. We didn’t seek his advice. The government you elected did. One I accept as a result of our democracy. He made an error, but not an illegal one.

Worst case scenarios are always within defined parameters, however unlikely, so whilst a wipeout might be theoretically possible it is also implausible.

This concentration on someone whose involvement and influence is in the past is a diversion.

Campbell is influential now, and not in any kind of useful way.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It wasn't up to the country to close down for months either, particularly following the recommendation of someone with such a poor record.
If it's a diversion then ignore it. Maybe he's being economical with the truth which is acceptable for politicians but not for a YouTuber.

Absolutely bang on truth that anyone who isn't brainwashed by BBC/itv news can see. If you explained it to a brainwashed person you might have a good chance of deprogramming them.

This is far too simple for Wisbech to understand. I'm not joking when I say this. Wisbech is very intelligent. But he's not seeing the simple truth in front of his eyes. That's why he's such a wind merchant..lol

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.