This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
The Wilfried Zaha Thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Dannyh.V2  Stone lickers 07 Feb 19 3.51pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle I'm torn on this one. Wilf certainly is fouled a lot but so is Townsend and he doesn't bitch like a little girl. Wilf is a great player and could be one of the best the premiership has seen IF he stops whining about being fouled and just gets on with his game. HOWEVER.... some of the refereeing decisions we have seen at Selhurst this year have been utterly disgusting. And not just at Selhurst but also when we are away, the tackle on Townsend that could have easily broke his leg didn't even get a foul let alone the deserved red card. It's not just us either, to much is being missed by the officials, the Elbow from the Weed wnaker last night, Bindippers obvious Offside goal. and the very obvious penalty not given by Anthony Taylor, in fact he booked the Burnley player for diving, in what was the most blatant nailed on stone wall pen I have ever witnessed, and all that lot was one weekend!! So I get why Wilfs frustrations boil over. It's like being bullied at school. telling the teacher,, and them doing nothing about it, eventually you're going to snap and do something about yourself. But he does get paid a stupid amount of money, so he should be better at holding his tongue and just getting on with it.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| monkey Sittingbourne,but made in Bromley 07 Feb 19 3.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle WTF?? Who’s the brains behind merging a thread about a comparison of Vince Hilaire and Wilf with a thread on Wilf’s Ban?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 07 Feb 19 3.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by ItsCPFCforme
It’s not clear if it means an ADDITIONAL match or not. I would imagine, though, that this means just ‘one match ban’ and the fact he has served that already is beside the point. Talksport say he will miss the West Ham game.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ItsCPFCforme 07 Feb 19 3.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Badger11
Talksport say he will miss the West Ham game. Not necessarily... it depends when he has to lodge an appeal by. The ban is suspended while he considers his appeal. If done right, he could take the ban for the Doncaster game
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Nobbybm Dartford 07 Feb 19 3.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Badger11
Talksport say he will miss the West Ham game. It seems Talks***e might be wrong. The ban is not effective until he’s decided whether to exercise his right to appeal for which he should have 3 days (working). That being the case, he could hold out until then, play Saturday & take the ban for the FA cup game. Edited by Nobbybm (07 Feb 2019 4.01pm)
Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| AppleSource Tel Aviv 07 Feb 19 3.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by ItsCPFCforme
It’s not clear if it means an ADDITIONAL match or not. I would imagine, though, that this means just ‘one match ban’ and the fact he has served that already is beside the point.
Too bad we didn't catch the panel on one of their inconsistent days. Still I'd appeal it and have him available for the Spammers.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| claphameagle79 07 Feb 19 3.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle And talksport are never wrong ever.....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 07 Feb 19 3.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by ItsCPFCforme
Not necessarily... it depends when he has to lodge an appeal by. The ban is suspended while he considers his appeal. If done right, he could take the ban for the Doncaster game Fair enough but does he not run the risk of increasing the ban if the FA think his appeal is frivolous or Palace are trying to manipulate the fixtures?
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ItsCPFCforme 07 Feb 19 4.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Badger11
Fair enough but does he not run the risk of increasing the ban if the FA think his appeal is frivolous or Palace are trying to manipulate the fixtures? He only has to ‘respond’ within 3 working days... he doesn’t have to lodge an appeal. Respond after the West Ham game saying he will accept the finding and won’t appeal and there you go, suspended for Donny.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Nobbybm Dartford 07 Feb 19 4.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Badger11
Fair enough but does he not run the risk of increasing the ban if the FA think his appeal is frivolous or Palace are trying to manipulate the fixtures? Only if he does appeal.. The ban will not be enforced until he decides whether to or not.
Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bexleydave Barnehurst 07 Feb 19 4.04pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by monkey
WTF?? Who’s the brains behind merging a thread about a comparison of Vince Hilaire and Wilf with a thread on Wilf’s Ban? I am; are you questioning my decision?
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 07 Feb 19 4.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by ItsCPFCforme
He only has to ‘respond’ within 3 working days... he doesn’t have to lodge an appeal. Respond after the West Ham game saying he will accept the finding and won’t appeal and there you go, suspended for Donny. Sounds good to me.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.