This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Rafiq
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Stirlingsays  12 Nov 21 10.32pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Apparently, calling out positive discrimination as an anti White policy is 'racist'. Anything that is pro one group must disadvantage everyone else. The racism enquiry in Yorkshire is a witch hunt plain and simple. It is purely to make an example of people in an absurdly disproportionate manner while forcing yet another institution to accept a quota of minorities in their decision making process. The way forward is whatever the elites want it to be. This path was a choice, not a requirement. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Nov 2021 10.43pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Mapletree Croydon 12 Nov 21 11.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Apparently, calling out positive discrimination as an anti White policy is 'racist'. Anything that is pro one group must disadvantage everyone else. The racism enquiry in Yorkshire is a witch hunt plain and simple. It is purely to make an example of people in an absurdly disproportionate manner while forcing yet another institution to accept a quota of minorities in their decision making process. Any discrimination based upon protected characteristics is illegal. ‘Calling it out’ is fine.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Nov 21 12.39am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
It's mostly a London ting still init. It's rare elsewhere. Even here it still draws attention when it's OTT. An issue of degrees really, but I don't disagree with others that for say public facing jobs where clear communication is key, it's not exactly a good fit.. It’s not exactly desirable for business to business communication or colleague to colleague communication.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 13 Nov 21 12.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Which means that his 'racism' isn't their approved 'racism'. What is it that Dan's Stormzy said? 'I ain't anti white, I'm just pro black'. Remember the left and centralists trying to cancel him over that one....no, I don't either. Yet speak your mind in Yorkshire, even when you think it's with a mate and....bye bye blue. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Nov 2021 10.18pm) The real world has really passed you by these days hasn’t it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 13 Nov 21 12.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
It’s not exactly desirable for business to business communication or colleague to colleague communication. Businesses hire who they want and communicate how they want. They adapt quickly to the world around them and what makes money. The world is changing and you lot on here aren’t. Adapt and survive. Or fade away. It’s still the basic Darwinism concept.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 13 Nov 21 1.12am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You see Dan, I don't need to prove to you what I know to be true. I don't care what you believe. You can quote laws all you like. Anti prejudice legislation only works against White people. It is designed that way. It is intended to disenfranchise the 'White ruling class' and enforce 'diversity' whether they like it or not. It is the new fascism which, ironically, is supported by naive liberals and Leftists. One has to wonder where all these directives are coming from. Why would those in the shadows want this? Follow the money. Only just seen this. One of the most tin hatted, nonsensical, illogical and hilarious posts I’ve seen on here. And Lombardinho has posted on here today. You realise all you have is in your head don’t you? You have nothing to back it up.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  13 Nov 21 1.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Businesses hire who they want and communicate how they want. They adapt quickly to the world around them and what makes money. The world is changing and you lot on here aren’t. Adapt and survive. Or fade away. It’s still the basic Darwinism concept. The Times they are A-Changing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 13 Nov 21 3.20am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
The real world has really passed you by these days hasn’t it. Says the guy who ignored my statement that a man can't biologically change to a woman. How much attachment do you really have to what's real Dan? In your political world that recognition of reality apparently means that I hate people. Whereas I just think it's a recognition of fact. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2021 3.21am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Hrolf The Ganger 13 Nov 21 10.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Any discrimination based upon protected characteristics is illegal. ‘Calling it out’ is fine. As it should be, but as we see, reality is often different. Making a law does not determine how it is applied or if it is enforced. We all know what that means.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 13 Nov 21 10.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Says the guy who ignored my statement that a man can't biologically change to a woman. How much attachment do you really have to what's real Dan? In your political world that recognition of reality apparently means that I hate people. Whereas I just think it's a recognition of fact. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2021 3.21am) Because it was you getting desperate throwing something in to derail a thread where your mate was and still is getting made to look increasingly stupid and any point he was trying to make completely invalidated through a total lack of any evidence. In your political world you take some Bro’s version of reality you’ve seen on the internet, try and pass it off as your own opinion, use extremely questionable source data to try and back it up, and double down even when proved wrong. A pair of extremely unserious men.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 13 Nov 21 10.06am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Only just seen this. One of the most tin hatted, nonsensical, illogical and hilarious posts I’ve seen on here. And Lombardinho has posted on here today. You realise all you have is in your head don’t you? You have nothing to back it up. Have you ever read any of your own? It is funny that when I present a fact that I know to be true based on actual personal knowledge of real events, you still say it's in my head. When you post something grown up, I might bother to respond again.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 13 Nov 21 10.10am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Have you ever read any of your own? It is funny that when I present a fact that I know to be true based on actual personal knowledge of real events, you still say it's in my head. When you post something grown up, I might bother to respond again. You realise if you took this approach in a court of law you would get laughed out don’t you? You can’t just say something is true and that makes it so. Edited by DanH (13 Nov 2021 10.11am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.