This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 17 Oct 21 3.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Just an observation. None of us will be alive to see it. It is interesting how we white wash our own religious history, and don't examine how we threw off the more radical parts of Christianity. I don't see Islam doing it any time soon, as things like the Crusades are the things they mainly concentrate on in places such as education. Islam is very much anti all other beliefs, I personally believe it's how Islam defines itself. In opposition to others. Not a good recipe for peaceful coexistence. I respect your opinion and agree with you observations. I'd add a personal opinion where I may differ a little and say that in the main I don't think we white wash our history, religious or otherwise....in fact I think we are far harsher than any other culture. Also, I think Christianity in the medieval age was a reflection of the times, while Islam in some respects....as you observe, is reluctant to move on.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 17 Oct 21 3.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I respect your opinion and agree with you observations. I'd add a personal opinion where I may differ a little and say that in the main I don't think we white wash our history, religious or otherwise....in fact I think we are far harsher than any other culture. Also, I think Christianity in the medieval age was a reflection of the times, while Islam in some respects....as you observe, is reluctant to move on. Just "remembered" you get Guido Fawkes' Night soon. They brought back torture for him. And the old drawn and quartered with a few tasty extras. Perhaps not fully religious, although that is how it is viewed in Ireland. Definitely that is how it was viewed by Fawkes. A religious extremist of the time, not even that long ago really. Joe Biden was probably there.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 17 Oct 21 3.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
You silly right wingers and your xenophobia. I don’t defend Islamist extremists, they are the scum of the earth. Normal rank and file Muslims are not ideologically aligned with ISIS. Calling all Muslims anti western and the enemy of white English people is absolute bollocks. This is a war which only exists in the minds of the fans of Tommy Robinson. I’m sorry you don’t like seeing women with headdresses on when you go out for your Sunday paper, Stirley, I really am, but you are going to have to live and let live I’m afraid, this isn’t the 1950s. I made the point about Jo Cox, her killer was born in Scotland - better close the border. People don’t though do they? They all move away. Oh but you wouldn’t know that, so carry on…
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Oct 21 4.57pm | |
---|---|
Mainey says that, 'Normal rank and file Muslims are not ideologically aligned with ISIS.' In think that in the main that's correct, only a minority of Muslims in the west want actual ISIS. However it would be wrong to suggest that a majority wouldn't want a ruling Islamic state...say similar to Turkey that had better economics. It's also an observation that more Muslims joined ISIS than have joined the British Army....the numbers aren't even close. It's also correct to observe that the majority of Muslims in the west have a far greater pull towards their identity as not western. When terrorist attacks happen the Islamic community revert to the 'them and us' mindset and it tends to be difficult to gain information. I'm of the view that only selected denominations of Islam should be allowed into the west.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Oct 21 5.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Just "remembered" you get Guido Fawkes' Night soon. They brought back torture for him. And the old drawn and quartered with a few tasty extras. Perhaps not fully religious, although that is how it is viewed in Ireland. Definitely that is how it was viewed by Fawkes. A religious extremist of the time, not even that long ago really. Joe Biden was probably there. Like all of us I was raised to celebrate what is in fact the killing of Guido Fawkes...celebrating the success of the elites in saving themselves. When you grow up and actually find out what happened, you learn that Fawkes and company had legitimate complaints.....if not perhaps a legitimate expression of them.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 17 Oct 21 5.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Like all of us I was raised to celebrate what is in fact the killing of Guido Fawkes...celebrating the success of the elites in saving themselves. When you grow up and actually find out what happened, you learn that Fawkes and company had legitimate complaints.....if not perhaps a legitimate expression of them. An act of parliament was passed in 1606 ‘The Observance of 5th November Act 1605’ requiring churches to hold a service of thanksgiving for the country’s deliverance from the gunpowder plot. After 1688, the services included thanksgiving for the landing of William of Orange in England on 5 November 1688. The bonfires generally burnt effigies of the Pope more than Guy Fawkes. The 5th of November celebrations were very much anti-Catholic. The observance act was repealed in 1859.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Oct 21 5.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
An act of parliament was passed in 1606 ‘The Observance of 5th November Act 1605’ requiring churches to hold a service of thanksgiving for the country’s deliverance from the gunpowder plot. After 1688, the services included thanksgiving for the landing of William of Orange in England on 5 November 1688. The bonfires generally burnt effigies of the Pope more than Guy Fawkes. The 5th of November celebrations were very much anti-Catholic. The observance act was repealed in 1859. Thanks for that George, I never knew that they had made these services compulsory. We can see that authoritarianism and thought policing is in our past, which probably explains why so many are happy with going back to it with recent laws. Secular humanism becomes more religiously authoritarian with its tenets as it goes along.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Oct 21 10.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm certain that the majority of Muslims are not radicals or supportive of violence. Unfortunately, there are those that are supportive and those that are prepared to do violence. No one is suggesting that all Muslims should be persecuted, but there is no doubt that certain nationalities should not be allowed here in future for the sake of public safety. We should also deport anyone who shows any sign of supporting terrorism or are anti Western. Trying to obfuscate the causes of this problem by introducing erroneous factors like Brexit for example is shameful. It also amazes me when people like you seem more concerned with defending Islam rather than our democracy or the safety of our citizens. Islamic faith has no place in this country. Muslims themselves should not be the focus of hatred, but fundamentalism and those that use it to justify violence cannot be allowed to proliferate further. It is NOT a fact that we have Islamic terrorism in this country because we have a "significant number" of Muslims. That is far too simplistic an assertion. The Jews weren't causing problems, but still got scapegoated. Muslims aren't causing problems now. Radical elements, committing criminal acts are. You don't want to persecute ALL Muslims, when your whole approach does just that. I want to draw a distinct, heavy demarcation line between the law-abiding and the radical criminals. Treating them any other way delivers the precise opposite of what is needed. To close our doors to refugees from countries you fear may deliver us terrorists would create more problems than it solves. We would break international agreements. Condemn the innocent to lives of misery, and worse. Build pockets of unhappy, resentful people and send them into the waiting arms of the radicals. Yours is a "Trump wall" solution, and not one that can work. There are no easy answers. It needs patience, time and determination. This has nothing to do with Brexit, which I haven't mentioned, so why do you? Nor am I defending Islam! I have no time for ANY religion, and even less for those radicalised by one. I judge on behaviour alone, and not by what anyone believes. You say the Islamic faith has no place in our country AND that Muslims should not be hated. What better example is there of hatred than telling a person that their faith isn't welcome here?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Oct 21 10.17pm | |
---|---|
All those Islamic terrorist attacks in Poland and Hungary.....must be the significant Islamic populations there. Oh wait....
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 18 Oct 21 12.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
All those Islamic terrorist attacks in Poland and Hungary.....must be the significant Islamic populations there. Oh wait.... do the men in those countries call Western men a 'bunch of cucks' ?
In the West, its all about money, open-borders & tolerant Political Correctness, LGBTq , pro choice, multiculti . The Catholic Sir David Amess would never have got murdered in Budapest or Krakow. AND he would have liked the prevailing ideology. RiP
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 18 Oct 21 2.23am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by PalazioVecchio
do the men in those countries call Western men a 'bunch of cucks' ?
In the West, its all about money, open-borders & tolerant Political Correctness, LGBTq , pro choice, multiculti . The Catholic Sir David Amess would never have got murdered in Budapest or Krakow. AND he would have liked the prevailing ideology. RiP Certainly we should do all we can to monitor those who seek to harm others whatever their ideology, and if immigration policy factors into that so be it. Good luck getting the government to go along with that though. Plenty of people get murdered in Russia mind you. Plus getting everything into perspective I'm not sure that Eastern Europe is some kind of dream alternative that we're all clambering to move to.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 18 Oct 21 12.25pm | |
---|---|
--- Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (18 Oct 2021 12.27pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.