This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay UK 11 Jan 21 6.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
It wont be a head count. It will be offers. If people cannot be bothered or think there is an ulterior motive then so be it. The problem is that others would gladly have had it. These people without a good reason they didnt accept it should go to the back of the queue. 100%. I know some people are apprehensive, but considering it's being provided to those most at need what a thing to turn down.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Jan 21 6.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
It wont be a head count. It will be offers. If people cannot be bothered or think there is an ulterior motive then so be it. The problem is that others would gladly have had it. These people without a good reason they didnt accept it should go to the back of the queue. They haven’t got through over 80’s yet. Might be people desperate for inheritance and want to save money on future care home costs and let taking their elderly parents to get the vaccine slip their minds.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 11 Jan 21 8.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Fair play CP. Look after that lovely lady, Thanks mate, shes not but doesn"t hate them like her son!(the party-not all tories).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 11 Jan 21 8.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by croydon proud
Thanks mate, shes not but doesn"t hate them like her son!(the party-not all tories). You got a brother?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 11 Jan 21 8.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
They haven’t got through over 80’s yet. Might be people desperate for inheritance and want to save money on future care home costs and let taking their elderly parents to get the vaccine slip their minds. Cynicism can be funny
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 11 Jan 21 8.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
You got a brother? Ha ha, have actually!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
martin2412 Living The Dream 11 Jan 21 8.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
They haven’t got through over 80’s yet. Might be people desperate for inheritance and want to save money on future care home costs and let taking their elderly parents to get the vaccine slip their minds. That reminds me of when my old man wanted to buy a new central heating boiler, and I convinced him his old one was a lot better than some of these new fan dangled contraptions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 13 Jan 21 12.21pm | |
---|---|
Initial Israeli data: First Pfizer shot curbs infections by 50% after 14 days - [Link] An interesting new study taken just two weeks after the first Pfizer shot was administered. It appear to suggest that it 'does' curb actual infection to some extent two weeks in (which would infer that it also reduces spread to others) rather than just the actual impact of the virus. However, "Alroy-Preis said that nearly one-fifth of over 1,000 current serious COVID-19 patients had previously received the first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine". But when you consider the incubation period and also time it takes for the vaccine to start working, this figure will likely decrease massively over time. It's important to remember that these individuals could've been infected shortly after vaccination, and that it doesn't convey full protection. "The second dose is expected to bring immunity levels to some 95% after about a week". This comment from elsewhere on the study and vaccine is of note "the antibody titres are almost nonexistent days 0-13, and then increase until day 21. Then, after the second dose, they increase 10-fold, HIGHLY increasing your immune response". and "Preliminary data from the Clalit HMO Research Institute show that there is a significant decrease in the infection of those who have been vaccinated - 14 days after the first vaccine dose. This is a population aged 60 and over. In the 5 to 12 days after the first dose, no effect of the vaccine is seen at all, explains Prof. Ran Blitzer, head of Clalit's innovation department. On the 13th there is a slight decrease, then a 33% drop on the 14th."
"A paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine stated that the efficacy of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was 52.4% between the first and second dose (spaced 21 days apart).5 However, in its “green book” Public Health England said that during the phase III trial most of the vaccine failures were in the days immediately after the first dose, indicating that the short term protection starts around day 10.6 Looking at the data from day 15 to 21, it calculated that the efficacy against symptomatic covid-19 was around 89%." As such, hopefully a followup a further week on will have even more positive findings.
Hopefully studies like this will emerge pertaining to the other vaccines.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 13 Jan 21 12.36pm | |
---|---|
As for the Oxford vaccine: "In the case of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, PHE said, “High protection against hospitalisation was seen from 21 days after dose one until two weeks after the second dose, suggesting that a single dose will provide high short term protection against severe disease . . . An exploratory analysis of participants who had received one standard dose of the vaccine suggested that efficacy against symptomatic covid-19 was 73% (95% CI 48.79-85.76%).”
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Jan 21 12.46pm | |
---|---|
My wife received her first jab this morning. She got the Pfizer one. She is involved with the NHS so is on the priority list. I hope to get mine in a few weeks. My only worry was that it was done at the local hospital where a huge surge in cases was announced yesterday. It was very busy there with lots of rushing about.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 13 Jan 21 1.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
As for the Oxford vaccine: "In the case of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, PHE said, “High protection against hospitalisation was seen from 21 days after dose one until two weeks after the second dose, suggesting that a single dose will provide high short term protection against severe disease . . . An exploratory analysis of participants who had received one standard dose of the vaccine suggested that efficacy against symptomatic covid-19 was 73% (95% CI 48.79-85.76%).” This might be what the expert I heard refer to the 2nd dose as providing ‘quality and robustness’. What it means whenever that 1st dose isn’t protecting people and if there is a significant risk around we’ll find out, and were always going to by removing the 2nd dose. Foreign travel and in particular poorer countries waiting for WHO to vaccinate them will become an issue.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 13 Jan 21 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
My wife received her first jab this morning. She got the Pfizer one. She is involved with the NHS so is on the priority list. I hope to get mine in a few weeks. My only worry was that it was done at the local hospital where a huge surge in cases was announced yesterday. It was very busy there with lots of rushing about. Well that’s one thing to put your mind slightly more at ease. Hopefully she’ll get the follow-up shot when required.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.